{"title":"Comparison of Tangibles and Intangibles","authors":"I. Wallis","doi":"10.1061/JEEGAV.0000787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Three techniques are described for comparing the tangible and intangible costs and benefits involved in environmental and water resources projects. The three techniques are: (1)Engineering judgment; (2)cost-benefit analysis; and (3)preference analysis. A game used in interviews to establish preferences is described and the interpretation of the results of the game is covered. Development and cautious use of preference analysis as part of the evaluation of tangible and intangible costs and benefits is recommended.","PeriodicalId":17335,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Environmental Engineering Division","volume":"1 1","pages":"625-637"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Environmental Engineering Division","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1061/JEEGAV.0000787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Three techniques are described for comparing the tangible and intangible costs and benefits involved in environmental and water resources projects. The three techniques are: (1)Engineering judgment; (2)cost-benefit analysis; and (3)preference analysis. A game used in interviews to establish preferences is described and the interpretation of the results of the game is covered. Development and cautious use of preference analysis as part of the evaluation of tangible and intangible costs and benefits is recommended.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
