Stacknet based decision fusion classifier for network intrusion detection

Isaac Kofi Nti, Owusu Narko-Boateng, Adebayo Felix Adekoya, Arjun Remadevi Somanathan
{"title":"Stacknet based decision fusion classifier for network intrusion detection","authors":"Isaac Kofi Nti, Owusu Narko-Boateng, Adebayo Felix Adekoya, Arjun Remadevi Somanathan","doi":"10.34028/iajit/19/3A/8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Network intrusion is a subject of great concern to a variety of stakeholders. Decision fusion (ensemble) models that combine several base learners have been widely used to enhance detection rate of unauthorised network intrusion. However, the design of such an optimal decision fusion classifier is a challenging and open problem. The Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) is an effective measure for detecting associations between variables in many fields; however, very few studies have applied it in selecting weak learners to the best of the authors’ knowledge. In this paper, we propose a decision fusion model with correlation-based MCC weak learner selection technique to augment the classification performance of the decision fusion model under a StackNet strategy. Specifically, the proposed model sought to improve the association between the prediction accuracy and diversity of base classifiers. We compare our proposed model with five other ensemble models, a deep neural model and two stand-alone state-of-the-art classifiers commonly used in network intrusion detection based on accuracy, the Area Under Curve (AUC), recall, precision, F1-score and Kappa evaluation metrics. The experimental results using benchmark dataset KDDcup99 from Kaggle shows that the proposed model has a identified unauthorised network traffic at 99.8% accuracy, Extreme Gradient Boosting (Xgboost) (97.61%), Catboost (97.49%), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) (98.3%), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) (97.7%), Random Forest (RF) (97.97%), Extra Trees Classifier (ET) (95.82%), Different decision ( DT) (96.95%) and , K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) (95.56), indicating that it is a more efficient and better intrusion detection system. models and proposed decision fusion model.","PeriodicalId":13624,"journal":{"name":"Int. Arab J. Inf. Technol.","volume":"514 1","pages":"478-490"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. Arab J. Inf. Technol.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34028/iajit/19/3A/8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

: Network intrusion is a subject of great concern to a variety of stakeholders. Decision fusion (ensemble) models that combine several base learners have been widely used to enhance detection rate of unauthorised network intrusion. However, the design of such an optimal decision fusion classifier is a challenging and open problem. The Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) is an effective measure for detecting associations between variables in many fields; however, very few studies have applied it in selecting weak learners to the best of the authors’ knowledge. In this paper, we propose a decision fusion model with correlation-based MCC weak learner selection technique to augment the classification performance of the decision fusion model under a StackNet strategy. Specifically, the proposed model sought to improve the association between the prediction accuracy and diversity of base classifiers. We compare our proposed model with five other ensemble models, a deep neural model and two stand-alone state-of-the-art classifiers commonly used in network intrusion detection based on accuracy, the Area Under Curve (AUC), recall, precision, F1-score and Kappa evaluation metrics. The experimental results using benchmark dataset KDDcup99 from Kaggle shows that the proposed model has a identified unauthorised network traffic at 99.8% accuracy, Extreme Gradient Boosting (Xgboost) (97.61%), Catboost (97.49%), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) (98.3%), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) (97.7%), Random Forest (RF) (97.97%), Extra Trees Classifier (ET) (95.82%), Different decision ( DT) (96.95%) and , K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) (95.56), indicating that it is a more efficient and better intrusion detection system. models and proposed decision fusion model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于Stacknet的网络入侵检测决策融合分类器
网络入侵是许多利益相关者非常关注的问题。决策融合(集成)模型是一种结合多个基础学习器的决策融合模型,它被广泛用于提高对未经授权的网络入侵的检出率。然而,这种最优决策融合分类器的设计是一个具有挑战性和开放性的问题。马修斯相关系数(MCC)是许多领域中检测变量之间关联的有效测度。然而,据作者所知,很少有研究将其应用于选择弱学习者。为了提高决策融合模型在StackNet策略下的分类性能,本文提出了一种基于关联的MCC弱学习者选择技术的决策融合模型。具体来说,该模型旨在提高基分类器的预测精度和多样性之间的关系。我们将我们提出的模型与其他五个集成模型、一个深度神经模型和两个独立的最先进的分类器进行比较,这些分类器通常用于基于准确性、曲线下面积(AUC)、召回率、精度、f1分数和Kappa评估指标的网络入侵检测。使用Kaggle的基准数据集KDDcup99的实验结果表明,所提出的模型识别未经授权的网络流量的准确率为99.8%,极端梯度增强(Xgboost) (97.61%), Catboost(97.49%),光梯度增强机(LightGBM)(98.3%),多层感知器(MLP)(97.7%),随机森林(RF)(97.97%),额外树分类器(ET)(95.82%),不同决策(DT)(96.95%)和k -最近邻(KNN)(95.56)。表明它是一种效率更高、性能更好的入侵检测系统。模型和提出的决策融合模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Novel Energy Efficient Harvesting Technique for SDWSN using RF Transmitters with MISO Beamforming Incorporating triple attention and multi-scale pyramid network for underwater image enhancement Generative adversarial networks with data augmentation and multiple penalty areas for image synthesis MAPNEWS: a framework for aggregating and organizing online news articles Deep learning based mobilenet and multi-head attention model for facial expression recognition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1