Can We Achieve Selectivity In Plasma Medicine?

Q1 Medicine Clinical Plasma Medicine Pub Date : 2018-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cpme.2017.12.067
Kristian Wende , Jan-Wilm Lackmann , Helena Jablonowski , Katharina Stapelmann , Thomas von Woedtke , Sander Bekeschus
{"title":"Can We Achieve Selectivity In Plasma Medicine?","authors":"Kristian Wende ,&nbsp;Jan-Wilm Lackmann ,&nbsp;Helena Jablonowski ,&nbsp;Katharina Stapelmann ,&nbsp;Thomas von Woedtke ,&nbsp;Sander Bekeschus","doi":"10.1016/j.cpme.2017.12.067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cold physical plasmas have made a remarkable progress over the last few years and are increasingly established in clinics. Especially in chronic wound care and in palliative cancer treatment plasma has a firm foothold [1, 2]. However, the underlying mechanisms have not been completely understood [3, 4].</p><p>In the gas phase of cold plasmas, various chemical entities (electrons, ions, metastables, radicals) can be quantified which subsequently interact with an aqueous or biomolecule dominated interfacial layer. The prevailing secondary species of such encounter are matter of debate, with proposed short lived OH, 1O2, O, e-, H, medium lived NO, OCl-, O3, ONOO-, NO2-, and +/- persistent candidates NO3- or H2O2 for aqueous systems [5]. In the case of separate plasma treatment (creating plasma treated liquids) only a few species are stable enough to finally interact clinically or experimentally with a desired target [6, 7]. Similarly, in the case of the direct treatment, the resulting (or remaining) active species and their propagation in gel-like biomolecule matrices, seems to be limited to stable species. Contrasting these experimental results and conclusions, cold plasma has been deployed successfully in a number of completely different conditions. In all cases research points towards an interference with the cellular redox signaling cascade [8].</p><p>Accordingly, it must be asked if 1) a common biological denominator exist in all successful applications, if 2) the composition of the plasma treated liquid or the biomolecule matrix in direct treatment determines the effect of the plasma, if 3) the treated tissue itself determines the impact and effectivity of the treatment, or if all aspects add proportionately to the plasmas clinical effectivity. If one (or all) statements are true, it appears that i) plasma source design is subordinate, ii) selectivity is determined by the target and not the treatment, and iii) cold plasma delivers an impulse rather than a substantial dose.</p><p>To respond to these theses satisfactorily, our research applying multicellular organoid/animal models and complex biochemical models in order to seek for primary or secondary signs of redox signaling and its potential precursors or conditions [9]. Standardized protocols are used to determine the biochemical equivalence of different plasma sources and to infer on their clinical impact. It can be stated so far, that a cells or tissues properties, e.g. origin, protein content, or membrane composition, massively renders the biological impact of a plasma treatment. On the other hand, different chemical fingerprints have been obtained for various plasma sources, fueling engineering approaches to tailor selective plasma sources.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46325,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Plasma Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cpme.2017.12.067","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Plasma Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212816617300926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Cold physical plasmas have made a remarkable progress over the last few years and are increasingly established in clinics. Especially in chronic wound care and in palliative cancer treatment plasma has a firm foothold [1, 2]. However, the underlying mechanisms have not been completely understood [3, 4].

In the gas phase of cold plasmas, various chemical entities (electrons, ions, metastables, radicals) can be quantified which subsequently interact with an aqueous or biomolecule dominated interfacial layer. The prevailing secondary species of such encounter are matter of debate, with proposed short lived OH, 1O2, O, e-, H, medium lived NO, OCl-, O3, ONOO-, NO2-, and +/- persistent candidates NO3- or H2O2 for aqueous systems [5]. In the case of separate plasma treatment (creating plasma treated liquids) only a few species are stable enough to finally interact clinically or experimentally with a desired target [6, 7]. Similarly, in the case of the direct treatment, the resulting (or remaining) active species and their propagation in gel-like biomolecule matrices, seems to be limited to stable species. Contrasting these experimental results and conclusions, cold plasma has been deployed successfully in a number of completely different conditions. In all cases research points towards an interference with the cellular redox signaling cascade [8].

Accordingly, it must be asked if 1) a common biological denominator exist in all successful applications, if 2) the composition of the plasma treated liquid or the biomolecule matrix in direct treatment determines the effect of the plasma, if 3) the treated tissue itself determines the impact and effectivity of the treatment, or if all aspects add proportionately to the plasmas clinical effectivity. If one (or all) statements are true, it appears that i) plasma source design is subordinate, ii) selectivity is determined by the target and not the treatment, and iii) cold plasma delivers an impulse rather than a substantial dose.

To respond to these theses satisfactorily, our research applying multicellular organoid/animal models and complex biochemical models in order to seek for primary or secondary signs of redox signaling and its potential precursors or conditions [9]. Standardized protocols are used to determine the biochemical equivalence of different plasma sources and to infer on their clinical impact. It can be stated so far, that a cells or tissues properties, e.g. origin, protein content, or membrane composition, massively renders the biological impact of a plasma treatment. On the other hand, different chemical fingerprints have been obtained for various plasma sources, fueling engineering approaches to tailor selective plasma sources.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们能在血浆医学中实现选择性吗?
冷物理等离子体在过去几年中取得了显著的进展,并越来越多地在诊所建立起来。特别是在慢性伤口护理和姑息性癌症治疗中,血浆有着坚实的立足点[1,2]。然而,其潜在机制尚未完全了解[3,4]。在冷等离子体的气相中,各种化学实体(电子、离子、亚稳态、自由基)可以被量化,它们随后与水或生物分子主导的界面层相互作用。这种相遇的主要次级物质是有争议的,提出了短命的OH, 1O2, O, e-, H,中等寿命的NO, OCl-, O3, ONOO-, NO2-和+/-持久性候选NO3-或H2O2用于水系统[5]。在分离等离子体处理(产生等离子体处理液体)的情况下,只有少数物质足够稳定,最终能够在临床或实验中与期望的靶标相互作用[6,7]。同样,在直接处理的情况下,产生的(或剩余的)活性物种及其在凝胶状生物分子基质中的繁殖,似乎仅限于稳定的物种。对比这些实验结果和结论,冷等离子体已经在许多完全不同的条件下成功地部署。在所有情况下,研究都指向了对细胞氧化还原信号级联的干扰[8]。因此,必须问是否1)在所有成功的应用中存在一个共同的生物学分母,如果2)直接治疗中的等离子体处理液体或生物分子基质的组成决定了等离子体的效果,如果3)处理的组织本身决定了治疗的影响和有效性,或者是否所有方面都成比例地增加了等离子体的临床有效性。如果一个(或全部)陈述是正确的,那么似乎i)等离子体源设计是次要的,ii)选择性是由目标而不是治疗决定的,iii)冷等离子体提供脉冲而不是大剂量。为了满意地回答这些问题,我们的研究应用了多细胞类器官/动物模型和复杂的生化模型,以寻找氧化还原信号的主要或次要信号及其潜在的前体或条件[9]。标准化方案用于确定不同血浆来源的生化等效性,并推断其临床影响。迄今为止可以陈述的是,细胞或组织特性,例如来源、蛋白质含量或膜组成,大量地呈现等离子体处理的生物影响。另一方面,不同的等离子体源获得了不同的化学指纹图谱,为定制选择性等离子体源的工程方法提供了动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Plasma Medicine
Clinical Plasma Medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Changes in enamel after bleaching pre-treatment with non-thermal atmospheric plasma Increasing the effectivity of the antimicrobial surface of carbon quantum dots-based nanocomposite by atmospheric pressure plasma Cold atmospheric plasma treatment on failed finger perforator flap: A case report Canady cold plasma conversion system treatment: An effective inhibitor of cell viability in breast cancer molecular subtypes A comparison of two cold atmospheric helium plasma devices which utilise the same RF power generator
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1