Dynamika edukacyjna aktywistów i system produkcji filmowej Stowarzyszenia Otwarte Klatki

Q4 Arts and Humanities Images (Poland) Pub Date : 2023-01-17 DOI:10.14746/i.2022.40.06
Patrycja Chuszcz
{"title":"Dynamika edukacyjna aktywistów i system produkcji filmowej Stowarzyszenia Otwarte Klatki","authors":"Patrycja Chuszcz","doi":"10.14746/i.2022.40.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \nThe article aims to analyze the educational dynamics of activists and the film production system of the Open Cages Association (SOK). It is an organization that fights for the rights of ‘farm animals’ through campaign videos published on the internet. In video-activist film productions and through educating volunteers and authors of audiovisual materials, SOK is aims at the effectiveness and optimization of time and costs of work. For this reason, it uses non-formal and informal forms of education. This organizational approach resembles that of a corporate strategy and strengthens social inequalities (non-formal and informal education is not available to everyone). This is in contradiction with the postulate of SOK – equality of all animals. Nevertheless, the activities of the organization are recalibrated. SOK subordinates them to the primacy of effectiveness in acting for the benefit of non-human living beings. I reconstruct the experiences of activist-filmmakers on the basis of in-depth interviews I have carried out with members of the organization. \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":37086,"journal":{"name":"Images (Poland)","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Images (Poland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/i.2022.40.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article aims to analyze the educational dynamics of activists and the film production system of the Open Cages Association (SOK). It is an organization that fights for the rights of ‘farm animals’ through campaign videos published on the internet. In video-activist film productions and through educating volunteers and authors of audiovisual materials, SOK is aims at the effectiveness and optimization of time and costs of work. For this reason, it uses non-formal and informal forms of education. This organizational approach resembles that of a corporate strategy and strengthens social inequalities (non-formal and informal education is not available to everyone). This is in contradiction with the postulate of SOK – equality of all animals. Nevertheless, the activities of the organization are recalibrated. SOK subordinates them to the primacy of effectiveness in acting for the benefit of non-human living beings. I reconstruct the experiences of activist-filmmakers on the basis of in-depth interviews I have carried out with members of the organization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本文旨在分析开放笼子协会(SOK)积极分子的教育动态和电影制作系统。这是一个通过在互联网上发布的竞选视频来争取“农场动物”权利的组织。在视频活动电影制作和教育志愿者和视听材料作者方面,SOK的目标是提高效率,优化时间和工作成本。因此,它采用非正规和非正式的教育形式。这种组织方法类似于公司战略,并加强了社会不平等(非正规和非正式教育并非人人都能接受)。这与SOK的假设——所有动物都是平等的——相矛盾。然而,该组织的活动被重新调整。SOK将他们置于为非人类生物的利益而行动的有效性的首要地位。我在与该组织成员进行深入访谈的基础上重构了活动家电影制作人的经历。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Images (Poland)
Images (Poland) Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Queerowanie gier AAA na przykładzie serii Assassin’s Creed – możliwości i zagrożenia Grofilia. Omówienie zjawiska na przykładzie wybranych seriali platformy Netflix Rola regulacji prawnych w kształtowaniu treści gier i mechanizmów ich promocji na przykładzie wybranych zagadnień ochrony konsumentów Postklasyczna groza. Przeobrażenia fuzji gatunkowej survival horroru Otwarty świat i narracja rozproszona w grze Elden Ring studia FromSoftware
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1