A crowding-out of public values? Managerial vs. Weberian values in public sector reform in Latin America

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI:10.1080/23276665.2022.2076135
Pablo Sanabria-Pulido, Cristian Pliscoff
{"title":"A crowding-out of public values? Managerial vs. Weberian values in public sector reform in Latin America","authors":"Pablo Sanabria-Pulido, Cristian Pliscoff","doi":"10.1080/23276665.2022.2076135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article analyzes whether and how managerial and Weberian value systems can coexist or collide in different organisational settings. We compare six public organisations in two Latin American countries to study whether public sector reforms imply a clash or a crowding-out between these values systems. The article uses data from 60 semi-structured interviews with public officials of different hierarchical levels, in public central government agencies with different ages, modernisation stages, and organisational structures. Our analysis reveals that even in different settings and types of organisations, Weberian values coexist with managerial ones and with other sets of values related to governance or political patronage. We conclude that managerial values do not necessarily crowd out other value systems as previous studies have found and appear to be adapted to the organisational and national contexts in which they operate.","PeriodicalId":43945,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration","volume":"9 19 1","pages":"291 - 314"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2022.2076135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article analyzes whether and how managerial and Weberian value systems can coexist or collide in different organisational settings. We compare six public organisations in two Latin American countries to study whether public sector reforms imply a clash or a crowding-out between these values systems. The article uses data from 60 semi-structured interviews with public officials of different hierarchical levels, in public central government agencies with different ages, modernisation stages, and organisational structures. Our analysis reveals that even in different settings and types of organisations, Weberian values coexist with managerial ones and with other sets of values related to governance or political patronage. We conclude that managerial values do not necessarily crowd out other value systems as previous studies have found and appear to be adapted to the organisational and national contexts in which they operate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共价值观的排挤?拉丁美洲公共部门改革中的管理价值观与韦伯价值观
本文分析了在不同的组织环境中,管理价值体系和韦伯价值体系是否能够共存,以及如何共存。我们比较了两个拉丁美洲国家的六个公共组织,以研究公共部门改革是否意味着这些价值观体系之间的冲突或排挤。本文使用了60个半结构化访谈的数据,这些访谈来自不同年龄、不同现代化阶段和不同组织结构的公共中央政府机构的不同等级的公职人员。我们的分析表明,即使在不同的环境和类型的组织中,韦伯价值观与管理价值观以及与治理或政治赞助相关的其他价值观并存。我们得出的结论是,管理价值观并不一定会像以前的研究发现的那样排挤其他价值体系,而且似乎会适应它们所处的组织和国家环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
20.70%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Religiosity and work motives among public sector employees The role of Confucian values in Korean administrative culture: a cultural-contextual perspective Exploring the effectiveness of youth outreach programmes: the case of Singapore The brave new world of AI: implications for public sector agents, organisations, and governance Digital transformation in a large democracy: the case of India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1