P. Chakraborty, S. Ghatak, R. Yadav, Subhajit Mukherjee, Lalchhandama Chhakchhuak, S. Chenkual, Thomas Zomuana, S. T. Lalruatfela, A. Maitra, N. S. Kumar
{"title":"Novel Somatic Mutations of the CDH1 Gene Associated with Gastric Cancer: Prediction of Pathogenicity Using Comprehensive In silico Methods","authors":"P. Chakraborty, S. Ghatak, R. Yadav, Subhajit Mukherjee, Lalchhandama Chhakchhuak, S. Chenkual, Thomas Zomuana, S. T. Lalruatfela, A. Maitra, N. S. Kumar","doi":"10.2174/1875692117999201109210911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nMutations in the CDH1 and the role of E-cadherin proteins are well\nestablished in gastric cancer. Several in silico tools are available to predict the pathogenicity\nof the mutations present in the genes with varying efficiency and sensitivity to detect the\npathogenicity of the mutations.\n\n\n\nOur objective was to identify somatic pathogenic variants in CDH1 involved in\nGastric Cancer (GC) by Sanger sequencing as well as using in silico tools and to find out\nthe best efficient tool for pathogenicity prediction of somatic missense variants.\n\n\n\nSanger sequencing of CDH1 was done for 80 GC tumor and adjacent normal tissues.\nSynthetic data sets were downloaded from the COSMIC database for comparison of\nthe known mutations with the discovered mutations from the present study. Different algorithms\nwere used to predict the pathogenicity of the discovery and synthetic mutation datasets\nusing various in-silico tools. Statistical analysis was done to check the efficiency of\nthe tools to predict pathogenic variants by using MEDCALC and GraphPad.\n\n\n\nSix missense somatic variants were found in exons 3, 4, 7, 9, 12 and 15. Out of the\n6 variants, 5 variants (chr16:68835618C>A, chr16:68845613A>C, chr16:68847271T>G,\nchr16:68856001T>G, chr16:68863585G>C) were novel and not reported in disease variant\ndatabases. PROVEAN, Polyphen 2 and PANTHER predicted the pathogenicity of the variants\nmore efficiently in both the discovery and synthetic datasets. The overall sensitivity of\npredictions ranged from 60 to 80%, depending on the program used, with specificity from\n55 to 100%.\n\n\n\nThis study estimates the specificity and sensitivity of prediction tools in predicting\nnovel missense variants of CDH1 in Gastric Cancer. We report that PROVEAN,\nPolyphen 2 and PANTHER are efficient predictors with constant higher specificity and accuracy.\nThis study will help the researchers to explore mutations with the best pathogenicity\nprediction tools.\n","PeriodicalId":11056,"journal":{"name":"Current Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1875692117999201109210911","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Mutations in the CDH1 and the role of E-cadherin proteins are well
established in gastric cancer. Several in silico tools are available to predict the pathogenicity
of the mutations present in the genes with varying efficiency and sensitivity to detect the
pathogenicity of the mutations.
Our objective was to identify somatic pathogenic variants in CDH1 involved in
Gastric Cancer (GC) by Sanger sequencing as well as using in silico tools and to find out
the best efficient tool for pathogenicity prediction of somatic missense variants.
Sanger sequencing of CDH1 was done for 80 GC tumor and adjacent normal tissues.
Synthetic data sets were downloaded from the COSMIC database for comparison of
the known mutations with the discovered mutations from the present study. Different algorithms
were used to predict the pathogenicity of the discovery and synthetic mutation datasets
using various in-silico tools. Statistical analysis was done to check the efficiency of
the tools to predict pathogenic variants by using MEDCALC and GraphPad.
Six missense somatic variants were found in exons 3, 4, 7, 9, 12 and 15. Out of the
6 variants, 5 variants (chr16:68835618C>A, chr16:68845613A>C, chr16:68847271T>G,
chr16:68856001T>G, chr16:68863585G>C) were novel and not reported in disease variant
databases. PROVEAN, Polyphen 2 and PANTHER predicted the pathogenicity of the variants
more efficiently in both the discovery and synthetic datasets. The overall sensitivity of
predictions ranged from 60 to 80%, depending on the program used, with specificity from
55 to 100%.
This study estimates the specificity and sensitivity of prediction tools in predicting
novel missense variants of CDH1 in Gastric Cancer. We report that PROVEAN,
Polyphen 2 and PANTHER are efficient predictors with constant higher specificity and accuracy.
This study will help the researchers to explore mutations with the best pathogenicity
prediction tools.
期刊介绍:
Current Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine (Formerly ‘Current Pharmacogenomics’) Current Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine (CPPM) is an international peer reviewed biomedical journal that publishes expert reviews, and state of the art analyses on all aspects of pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine under a single cover. The CPPM addresses the complex transdisciplinary challenges and promises emerging from the fusion of knowledge domains in therapeutics and diagnostics (i.e., theragnostics). The journal bears in mind the increasingly globalized nature of health research and services.