The opinions of physiotherapy students on online anatomy education during Covid-19 pandemic

Anatomy Pub Date : 2020-08-31 DOI:10.2399/ana.20.776029
Begümhan Turhan, Y. Yakut
{"title":"The opinions of physiotherapy students on online anatomy education during Covid-19 pandemic","authors":"Begümhan Turhan, Y. Yakut","doi":"10.2399/ana.20.776029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The aim of the present study was to explore the physiotherapy students’ attitudes towards online anatomy education during Covid-19 pandemic and thus to evaluate the possibile alternatives to improve online anatomy education. Methods: Sixty-four out of 78 first term physiotheraphy students (82%) participated in the study. Students were asked to participate voluntarily in an online survey composed of a Likert’s scale questionnaire. Results: The allocated study time of the students for Anatomy course decreased during the pandemic when compared to the time before the pandemic (p=0.014). The statement which was marked as ‘Totally Agree’ at the highest rate (46.9%) was ‘The questions given within the scope of the theoretical exam were consistent with the course contents’. The students also decided that the questions given within the scope of the theoretical exam were qualified to evaluate their level of anatomy. The marking rate of ‘Totally Agree’ option for this statement was 42.2%. In addition, the students ‘Totally agree’ at a rate of 40.6% that they felt less stressed in the exams of this course when compared to the first semester. Conclusion: It is anticipated that interactive lectures would be more helpful to teach anatomy. Moreover, it seems that anatomy education in physiotherapy and rehabilitation departments may need revisions to improve online anatomy education.","PeriodicalId":91999,"journal":{"name":"Anatomy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatomy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2399/ana.20.776029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to explore the physiotherapy students’ attitudes towards online anatomy education during Covid-19 pandemic and thus to evaluate the possibile alternatives to improve online anatomy education. Methods: Sixty-four out of 78 first term physiotheraphy students (82%) participated in the study. Students were asked to participate voluntarily in an online survey composed of a Likert’s scale questionnaire. Results: The allocated study time of the students for Anatomy course decreased during the pandemic when compared to the time before the pandemic (p=0.014). The statement which was marked as ‘Totally Agree’ at the highest rate (46.9%) was ‘The questions given within the scope of the theoretical exam were consistent with the course contents’. The students also decided that the questions given within the scope of the theoretical exam were qualified to evaluate their level of anatomy. The marking rate of ‘Totally Agree’ option for this statement was 42.2%. In addition, the students ‘Totally agree’ at a rate of 40.6% that they felt less stressed in the exams of this course when compared to the first semester. Conclusion: It is anticipated that interactive lectures would be more helpful to teach anatomy. Moreover, it seems that anatomy education in physiotherapy and rehabilitation departments may need revisions to improve online anatomy education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎疫情期间理疗专业学生对在线解剖教学的看法
目的:探讨新冠肺炎大流行期间物理治疗专业学生对在线解剖学教育的态度,以评估改进在线解剖学教育的可能选择。方法:78名第一学期物理治疗专业学生中有64名(82%)参与了研究。学生们被要求自愿参加一项由李克特量表问卷组成的在线调查。结果:与疫情前相比,疫情期间学生解剖学课程的学习时间有所减少(p=0.014)。回答“完全同意”的比率最高(46.9%)的是“理论考试范围内的问题与课程内容一致”。学生们还认为,理论考试范围内的问题足以评估他们的解剖学水平。“完全同意”选项的标记率为42.2%。此外,40.6%的学生“完全同意”这门课程的考试压力比第一学期小。结论:互动式教学对解剖学教学有较大的帮助。此外,物理治疗和康复部门的解剖学教育可能需要修改,以改善在线解剖学教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Importance of an unclear fascial layer, stylopharyngeal fascia: an anatomical study Abstracts of the 11th Anatomy Winter Days 7–9 March 2024, Aydın, Türkiye Welcome Address of the Congress President Abstracts of the 20th Turkish Neuroscience Congress 19–23 October 2022, Istanbul, Türkiye Welcome Address of the Congress Presidents. 20th Turkish Neuroscience Congress 19–23 October 2022, Istanbul, Türkiye
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1