WOMEN MAKE HORROR: FILMMAKING, FEMINISM, GENRE. Edited by Alison Peirse. Rutgers UP, 2020. 270 pp. $29.95 paper.

IF 0.5 3区 艺术学 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION JOURNAL OF POPULAR FILM AND TELEVISION Pub Date : 2021-10-02 DOI:10.1080/01956051.2021.1971926
H. Humann
{"title":"WOMEN MAKE HORROR: FILMMAKING, FEMINISM, GENRE. Edited by Alison Peirse. Rutgers UP, 2020. 270 pp. $29.95 paper.","authors":"H. Humann","doi":"10.1080/01956051.2021.1971926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Feminine Turn in Postwar Westerns”; Martin M. Winkler’s “Clytemnestra and Electra under Western Skies”; and Christopher Minz’s “‘Never seen a woman who was more of a man’: Saloon Girls, Women Heroes, and Female Masculinity in the Western.” Studlar examines the movies that present psychological drama and focus on family dynamics. Such films, informed by the growing popularity of Freudian theories, have a subversive potential because, in Studlar’s words, they “complicated American myths, whether by calling subtle attention to contradictions in them, or through more overt questioning of assumptions about gender and sexuality as well as race and class” (84). Winkler’s study shows affinities between the Western and classical myth, analyzing transpositions of Electra and Clytemnestra archetypes to film. Winkler quotes director Anthony Mann. saying, “You can take any of the great dramas; doesn’t matter whether it’s Shakespeare, whether it’s Greek plays, or what: you can always lay them in the West. They somehow become alive” (100). In Winkler’s assessment, the Western has always been conscious of its potential to provide a backdrop for classical drama and archetypal characters. Minz in turn argues that “the Western has never been specifically about men in its mythological structure” (107), describing the Western as a “masculinist” project and situating it within the masculine, rather than biologically male, frame of reference. Minz probes the “unconscious of the Western” and shows the pervasiveness and importance of a “non-male masculinity” (108). The chapters in the second part focus on contemporary Westerns and analyze them in the light of recent political events, reading the movies as a reflection of wider cultural narratives in which these events are understood, digested, and represented; many take 9/11 as a pivoting moment. Robert Spindler argues, “Western cinema after 9/11 seems to follow along two parallel and contradictory lines that either attempt to resurrect the traditional Western and the supposedly proto-American values the genre represents, or deconstruct its rigid forms further” (162); the essays in the second part confirm this assertion. Fran Pheasant-Kelly’s essay points to the women-as-victims trope and cowboy rhetoric in the post-9/11 Western. It starts with a strong statement: “At the core of the classic Western exists a mythology founded on convictions of American exceptionalism and white racial superiority” (121). In a similar vein, Kelly MacPhail continues with an examination of revisionist Westerns in his contribution: revisionist Westerns, as he stresses, highlight majority society’s anxiety concerning such issues as the “assimilation, miscegenation, and contamination of women” and provide a challenge to essentialist assumptions about gender, race, power dynamics, and identity (142). A particular brand of a revisionist Western, a feminist Western, is the focus of Andrew Patrick Nelson’s essay. Nelson discusses the validity of the label and examines the politics of representation at work in the films. The volume includes sixteen figures and an attractive cover, appropriately showing a still from a Western in which a woman’s whip keeps gazing men at a safe distance. She yields power and commands authority. She is simultaneously fascinating—going against our expectations of what femininity in horse operas might be like—and paradoxically unsurprising—as her authority derives naturally from her skill. She is much like the essays collected in Women in the Western. By turning its critical gaze to women in the Western, this volume does important corrective work. It forcefully and convincingly goes against the vast majority of research on the Western and its representations of gender, which has been overwhelmingly skewed to discuss masculinity, with the representations of femininity taking a marginal role at best, and a complementary and dependent one at worst. Just as the woman is essential to the Western, this volume is essential reading to anyone interested in the history of the genre, its critical reception, the latest developments in its theorizing, and to any lover of the oaters. Put succinctly, it has the potential of becoming a classic of Western criticism.","PeriodicalId":44169,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF POPULAR FILM AND TELEVISION","volume":"15 1","pages":"235 - 236"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF POPULAR FILM AND TELEVISION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01956051.2021.1971926","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Feminine Turn in Postwar Westerns”; Martin M. Winkler’s “Clytemnestra and Electra under Western Skies”; and Christopher Minz’s “‘Never seen a woman who was more of a man’: Saloon Girls, Women Heroes, and Female Masculinity in the Western.” Studlar examines the movies that present psychological drama and focus on family dynamics. Such films, informed by the growing popularity of Freudian theories, have a subversive potential because, in Studlar’s words, they “complicated American myths, whether by calling subtle attention to contradictions in them, or through more overt questioning of assumptions about gender and sexuality as well as race and class” (84). Winkler’s study shows affinities between the Western and classical myth, analyzing transpositions of Electra and Clytemnestra archetypes to film. Winkler quotes director Anthony Mann. saying, “You can take any of the great dramas; doesn’t matter whether it’s Shakespeare, whether it’s Greek plays, or what: you can always lay them in the West. They somehow become alive” (100). In Winkler’s assessment, the Western has always been conscious of its potential to provide a backdrop for classical drama and archetypal characters. Minz in turn argues that “the Western has never been specifically about men in its mythological structure” (107), describing the Western as a “masculinist” project and situating it within the masculine, rather than biologically male, frame of reference. Minz probes the “unconscious of the Western” and shows the pervasiveness and importance of a “non-male masculinity” (108). The chapters in the second part focus on contemporary Westerns and analyze them in the light of recent political events, reading the movies as a reflection of wider cultural narratives in which these events are understood, digested, and represented; many take 9/11 as a pivoting moment. Robert Spindler argues, “Western cinema after 9/11 seems to follow along two parallel and contradictory lines that either attempt to resurrect the traditional Western and the supposedly proto-American values the genre represents, or deconstruct its rigid forms further” (162); the essays in the second part confirm this assertion. Fran Pheasant-Kelly’s essay points to the women-as-victims trope and cowboy rhetoric in the post-9/11 Western. It starts with a strong statement: “At the core of the classic Western exists a mythology founded on convictions of American exceptionalism and white racial superiority” (121). In a similar vein, Kelly MacPhail continues with an examination of revisionist Westerns in his contribution: revisionist Westerns, as he stresses, highlight majority society’s anxiety concerning such issues as the “assimilation, miscegenation, and contamination of women” and provide a challenge to essentialist assumptions about gender, race, power dynamics, and identity (142). A particular brand of a revisionist Western, a feminist Western, is the focus of Andrew Patrick Nelson’s essay. Nelson discusses the validity of the label and examines the politics of representation at work in the films. The volume includes sixteen figures and an attractive cover, appropriately showing a still from a Western in which a woman’s whip keeps gazing men at a safe distance. She yields power and commands authority. She is simultaneously fascinating—going against our expectations of what femininity in horse operas might be like—and paradoxically unsurprising—as her authority derives naturally from her skill. She is much like the essays collected in Women in the Western. By turning its critical gaze to women in the Western, this volume does important corrective work. It forcefully and convincingly goes against the vast majority of research on the Western and its representations of gender, which has been overwhelmingly skewed to discuss masculinity, with the representations of femininity taking a marginal role at best, and a complementary and dependent one at worst. Just as the woman is essential to the Western, this volume is essential reading to anyone interested in the history of the genre, its critical reception, the latest developments in its theorizing, and to any lover of the oaters. Put succinctly, it has the potential of becoming a classic of Western criticism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
女性制造恐怖:电影制作、女权主义、类型。艾莉森·皮尔斯编辑。罗格斯大学,2020。270页,29.95美元。
战后西部片的女性转向”;马丁·m·温克勒的《西方天空下的克吕泰涅斯特拉和伊莱克特拉》;克里斯托弗·明茨的《从未见过一个更像男人的女人》:西部的沙龙女郎、女性英雄和女性男子气概。Studlar研究了那些呈现心理戏剧和关注家庭动态的电影。这样的电影,受到弗洛伊德理论日益流行的影响,具有颠覆性的潜力,因为,用Studlar的话来说,它们“使美国神话复杂化,无论是通过微妙地关注其中的矛盾,还是通过更公开地质疑关于性别、性、种族和阶级的假设”(84)。温克勒的研究显示了西方和古典神话之间的联系,分析了伊莱克特拉和克吕泰涅斯特拉原型在电影中的转换。温克勒引用了导演安东尼·曼的话。“你可以选择任何一部伟大的戏剧;不管它是莎士比亚的,还是希腊戏剧,还是别的什么,你都可以把它们放在西方。他们以某种方式活了起来”(100)。在温克勒的评价中,西部片一直意识到自己有潜力为古典戏剧和原型人物提供背景。Minz反过来认为,“西方从来没有在其神话结构中特别关注男性”(107),将西方描述为一个“男性主义”项目,并将其置于男性化的参考框架中,而不是生理上的男性。明茨探讨了“西方的无意识”,并展示了“非男性的男子气概”的普遍性和重要性(108)。第二部分的章节集中在当代西部片上,并根据最近的政治事件来分析它们,将电影视为更广泛的文化叙事的反映,在这种叙事中,这些事件被理解、消化和表现;许多人将9/11事件视为一个转折点。罗伯特·斯平德勒(Robert Spindler)认为,“9/11之后的西方电影似乎遵循着两条平行而矛盾的路线,要么试图复活传统的西方和这种类型所代表的所谓的原始美国价值观,要么进一步解构其僵化的形式”(162);第二部分的文章证实了这一论断。Fran Pheasant-Kelly的文章指出了后9/11西部片中女性作为受害者的比喻和牛仔的修辞。它以一个强有力的声明开始:“在经典西部片的核心存在着一个建立在美国例外论和白人种族优越论信念基础上的神话”(121)。同样,凯利·麦克菲尔(Kelly MacPhail)在他的贡献中继续考察了修正主义西部片:正如他所强调的,修正主义西部片强调了多数社会对“女性的同化、通婚和污染”等问题的焦虑,并对性别、种族、权力动态和身份认同等本质主义假设提出了挑战(142)。一种特殊的修正主义西部片,一种女权主义西部片,是安德鲁·帕特里克·尼尔森文章的重点。尼尔森讨论了标签的有效性,并考察了电影中表现的政治。这本书包括16个人物和一个吸引人的封面,恰如其分地展示了一幅来自西部的剧照,其中一个女人的鞭子一直在安全距离外凝视着男人。她交出权力,指挥权威。与此同时,她也很迷人——这与我们对马戏中女性气质的预期相反——自相矛盾的是,这并不令人惊讶——因为她的权威自然来自于她的技巧。她很像《西方女性》一书中的随笔。通过将批判的目光转向西方女性,这本书做了重要的纠正工作。它有力而令人信服地反对了绝大多数关于西方及其性别表现的研究,这些研究绝大多数都倾向于讨论男性气质,女性气质的表现充其量只是一个边缘角色,最坏的情况是一个补充和依赖的角色。正如女人对西部片来说是必不可少的一样,这本书对任何对西部片的历史、批评的接受、理论的最新发展感兴趣的人,以及任何对西部片的爱好者来说都是必不可少的读物。简而言之,它有可能成为西方批评的经典。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF POPULAR FILM AND TELEVISION
JOURNAL OF POPULAR FILM AND TELEVISION FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: How did Casablanca affect the home front during World War II? What is the postfeminist significance of Buffy the Vampire Slayer? The Journal of Popular Film and Television answers such far-ranging questions by using the methods of popular culture studies to examine commercial film and television, historical and contemporary. Articles discuss networks, genres, series, and audiences, as well as celebrity stars, directors, and studios. Regular features include essays on the social and cultural background of films and television programs, filmographies, bibliographies, and commissioned book and video reviews.
期刊最新文献
The Empire of Effects: Industrial Light & Magic and the Rendering of Realism Watching Game of Thrones: How Audiences Engage with Dark Television “She’s Got Gaps, I’ve Got Gaps”: A Neurodiversity Reading of Rocky (1976) Transcultural Comedy in Man Like Mobeen (2017-2023): How the BBC is Merging “Us”/“Them.” ALINE MACMAHON: HOLLYWOOD, THE BLACKLIST, AND THE BIRTH OF METHOD ACTING. By John Stangeland. UP of Kentucky, 2022. 340 pp. $40.00 (hardcover).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1