How effective is a chewable brush in removing plaque in children? A pilot study

T. Bezgin, C. Dağ, N. Özalp
{"title":"How effective is a chewable brush in removing plaque in children? A pilot study","authors":"T. Bezgin, C. Dağ, N. Özalp","doi":"10.4103/2321-6646.155557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the plaque removal efficiency of a chewable toothbrush (CB) in children. A total of 20 patients aged 10-12 years who attended to the Department of Pediatric Dentistry were enrolled in the study. This was a single-blinded crossover study which examined plaque removal efficiency of a CB compared to a manual toothbrush (MB) following a consecutive use. After professional prophylaxis had been given, participants refrained from brushing and chewing for 48 h. Supragingival plaque was examined using the Turesky modification of the Quigley-Hein Index (TQHI) and the simplified oral hygiene index (OHI-S). For statistical comparison, the difference (prebrushing minus postbrushing) in average scores was calculated. Data were evaluated by Mann-Whitney U-test, with a P < 0.05 considered to be statistically significant. The mean plaque reduction score with TQHI for CB and MB were 1.91 ± 0.54 and 1.96 ± 0.52, respectively. The mean plaque reduction score with OHI-S for CB and MB were 1.31 ± 0.288 and 1.34 ± 0.403, respectively. Differences in scores between the two brushes were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Within the limits of this study, the experimental chewable brush was found to be as effective as a manual brush in removing plaque. The chewable brush may be an appropriate oral hygiene adjunct for school children, including children with disabilities.","PeriodicalId":16711,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Dentistry","volume":"1 1","pages":"41 - 45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2321-6646.155557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the plaque removal efficiency of a chewable toothbrush (CB) in children. A total of 20 patients aged 10-12 years who attended to the Department of Pediatric Dentistry were enrolled in the study. This was a single-blinded crossover study which examined plaque removal efficiency of a CB compared to a manual toothbrush (MB) following a consecutive use. After professional prophylaxis had been given, participants refrained from brushing and chewing for 48 h. Supragingival plaque was examined using the Turesky modification of the Quigley-Hein Index (TQHI) and the simplified oral hygiene index (OHI-S). For statistical comparison, the difference (prebrushing minus postbrushing) in average scores was calculated. Data were evaluated by Mann-Whitney U-test, with a P < 0.05 considered to be statistically significant. The mean plaque reduction score with TQHI for CB and MB were 1.91 ± 0.54 and 1.96 ± 0.52, respectively. The mean plaque reduction score with OHI-S for CB and MB were 1.31 ± 0.288 and 1.34 ± 0.403, respectively. Differences in scores between the two brushes were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Within the limits of this study, the experimental chewable brush was found to be as effective as a manual brush in removing plaque. The chewable brush may be an appropriate oral hygiene adjunct for school children, including children with disabilities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可咀嚼刷清除儿童牙菌斑的效果如何?一项初步研究
本初步研究的目的是评估儿童咀嚼牙刷(CB)的牙菌斑清除效率。共有20名10-12岁的儿童牙科患者参加了这项研究。这是一项单盲交叉研究,研究了连续使用CB牙刷与手动牙刷(MB)的牙菌斑去除效率。在给予专业预防后,参与者避免刷牙和咀嚼48小时。使用Quigley-Hein指数(TQHI)和简化口腔卫生指数(ohi)的Turesky修正检查龈上菌斑。为了进行统计比较,计算平均得分的差值(刷前减去刷后)。资料采用Mann-Whitney u检验,P < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。CB和MB的TQHI平均斑块减少评分分别为1.91±0.54和1.96±0.52。CB和MB的OHI-S平均斑块减少评分分别为1.31±0.288和1.34±0.403。两种刷的得分差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。在本研究的范围内,发现实验咀嚼刷在清除牙菌斑方面与手动刷一样有效。对于学龄儿童,包括残疾儿童,咀嚼刷可能是一种适当的口腔卫生辅助工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of Geographic Information System Marks a Revolutionary Change in Dental Sciences Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome: "Wake Up Before It’s Too Late" Reviewing Nutritional Status in Children with Severe Early Childhood Caries Fragment Reattachment of Immature Permanent Incisors: Clinical Procedures and the Development of an Algorithm Filippi Syndrome: A Lesser Reported Craniodigital Syndrome with Unique Features
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1