Manual material handling assessment and repetitive tasks with two methods MAC and ART in a subsidiary of a manufacturer of cleaning products

S. Varmazyar, S. Shokri, Ali Safarivaryani
{"title":"Manual material handling assessment and repetitive tasks with two methods MAC and ART in a subsidiary of a manufacturer of cleaning products","authors":"S. Varmazyar, S. Shokri, Ali Safarivaryani","doi":"10.14196/SJR.V4I8.1899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the limitations of each method of posture evaluation; the results from the comparison and evaluation of combined methods in order to complete and assess a comprehensive list of risk factors of activities is important. The purpose of this study was evaluated risk factors of manual handling, repetitive tasks and to determine the correlation between the results from two MAC and ART techniques. In this descriptive-analytical study, 50 workers who were working in 25 jobs were studied. In each task, after interviewing workers and observing their work cycles, a video was produced and the risk factors related to each activity were evaluated separately in accordance with both MAC and ART techniques. The correlations two techniques were examined by spss16 using Pearson correlation test. In accordance with the ART and MAC, 16% of the work stations are at high risk level ART and MAC techniques showed that in stations of manual handling and repetitive movements are carried out, ratings of the two techniques are different. Also, a significant positive correlation (R=0.725) in the evaluation of musculoskeletal disorders were observed with the aforementioned methods. The findings of this study confirm the agreement between the two techniques of risk assessments that can be lowered by designing, modification of workplace, planning and implementation of ergonomic on the job training and establishing the appropriate work-rest cycle, musculoskeletal disorders","PeriodicalId":21707,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Journal of Review","volume":"292 1","pages":"116-123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Journal of Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14196/SJR.V4I8.1899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Due to the limitations of each method of posture evaluation; the results from the comparison and evaluation of combined methods in order to complete and assess a comprehensive list of risk factors of activities is important. The purpose of this study was evaluated risk factors of manual handling, repetitive tasks and to determine the correlation between the results from two MAC and ART techniques. In this descriptive-analytical study, 50 workers who were working in 25 jobs were studied. In each task, after interviewing workers and observing their work cycles, a video was produced and the risk factors related to each activity were evaluated separately in accordance with both MAC and ART techniques. The correlations two techniques were examined by spss16 using Pearson correlation test. In accordance with the ART and MAC, 16% of the work stations are at high risk level ART and MAC techniques showed that in stations of manual handling and repetitive movements are carried out, ratings of the two techniques are different. Also, a significant positive correlation (R=0.725) in the evaluation of musculoskeletal disorders were observed with the aforementioned methods. The findings of this study confirm the agreement between the two techniques of risk assessments that can be lowered by designing, modification of workplace, planning and implementation of ergonomic on the job training and establishing the appropriate work-rest cycle, musculoskeletal disorders
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用MAC和ART两种方法对某清洁产品制造商子公司的手工物料处理评估和重复性任务
由于各种姿势评估方法的局限性;从结果的比较和评价的综合方法,以完成和评价活动的危险因素的综合清单是重要的。本研究的目的是评估人工操作、重复性任务的危险因素,并确定两种MAC和ART技术结果之间的相关性。在这个描述性分析研究中,研究了50名从事25种工作的工人。在每项任务中,在采访工人并观察他们的工作周期后,制作了一段视频,并根据MAC和ART技术分别评估与每项活动相关的风险因素。采用Pearson相关检验spss16检验两种技术的相关性。根据ART和MAC, 16%的工位处于高风险水平,ART和MAC技术表明,在进行人工操作和重复运动的工位,两种技术的评级不同。此外,上述方法在评估肌肉骨骼疾病方面也观察到显著的正相关(R=0.725)。本研究的结果证实了两种风险评估技术之间的一致性,可以通过设计、修改工作场所、规划和实施符合人体工程学的在职培训以及建立适当的工作-休息周期来降低风险评估
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Review on nutrient management, cycles, flows and balances in different farming systems Impact of Saudi Digital Library (SDL) to Saudi research output: How to keep SDL on winning Use of non-classical feed resources and their influence on some performance indicators in rabbits. Optimization of heating characteristics of gas insulated switch-gear (GIS) The significance of crossbreeding in influencing growth traits, reproduction and carcass characteristics in rabbits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1