MODEL PEMBELAJARAN CORE, SCRAMBLE, HASIL BELAJAR, DAN OPERASI HITUNG BENTUK ALJABAR

Nathalia Ilela, C. Laamena, H. Tamalene
{"title":"MODEL PEMBELAJARAN CORE, SCRAMBLE, HASIL BELAJAR, DAN OPERASI HITUNG BENTUK ALJABAR","authors":"Nathalia Ilela, C. Laamena, H. Tamalene","doi":"10.30862/jhm.v4i1.175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The learning model has an essential role in student learning outcomes. Each learning model has different contributions, such as the Scramble learning model, which can make students think quickly, and the CORE learning model can train students to think critically. Thus, this study aims to compare students' learning outcomes with the two models, especially in arithmetic operations in algebraic forms. The research method used is quantitative research with a posttest-only group design classified as a quasi-experimental design. The research population was forty-five seventh-grade students, which were divided into two categories. The test instrument used is a description of five questions used to evaluate student learning outcomes. The study results analyzed statistically using the t-test showed that there were differences in student learning outcomes between the two groups of students. Furthermore, the continued test using Pairwise Comparison showed that students taught with the Scramble learning model had better learning outcomes than students acquainted with the CORE learning model.","PeriodicalId":33215,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Honai Math","volume":"5 1","pages":"85-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Honai Math","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30862/jhm.v4i1.175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The learning model has an essential role in student learning outcomes. Each learning model has different contributions, such as the Scramble learning model, which can make students think quickly, and the CORE learning model can train students to think critically. Thus, this study aims to compare students' learning outcomes with the two models, especially in arithmetic operations in algebraic forms. The research method used is quantitative research with a posttest-only group design classified as a quasi-experimental design. The research population was forty-five seventh-grade students, which were divided into two categories. The test instrument used is a description of five questions used to evaluate student learning outcomes. The study results analyzed statistically using the t-test showed that there were differences in student learning outcomes between the two groups of students. Furthermore, the continued test using Pairwise Comparison showed that students taught with the Scramble learning model had better learning outcomes than students acquainted with the CORE learning model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
核心学习模式,混乱学习,代数运算运算
学习模式对学生的学习效果起着至关重要的作用。每种学习模式都有不同的贡献,比如Scramble学习模式可以让学生快速思考,CORE学习模式可以训练学生批判性思考。因此,本研究旨在比较两种模式下学生的学习效果,特别是代数形式的算术运算。研究方法为定量研究,采用准实验设计的后测组设计。研究对象是45名七年级学生,他们被分为两类。所使用的测试工具是用来评估学生学习成果的五个问题的描述。研究结果采用t检验进行统计分析,两组学生的学习成果存在差异。此外,使用两两比较的继续测试表明,使用Scramble学习模式的学生比熟悉CORE学习模式的学生有更好的学习效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Why is the mathematics educator called inspiring? Examining purposeful researchable questions in mathematics education Understanding our world in a time of crisis: Mathematics education pedagogy toward financial numeracy Ethnomathematics on the Gringsing batik motifs in Javanese culture Monte Carlo method at the 24 game and its application for mathematics education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1