Sexual and Gender Minority University Students Report Distress Due to Discriminatory Health Care Policies.

IF 2.2 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Stigma and Health Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-18 DOI:10.1037/sah0000459
Gray Babbs, Hill Landon Wolfe, Michael R Ulrich, Julia Raifman, Sarah Ketchen Lipson
{"title":"Sexual and Gender Minority University Students Report Distress Due to Discriminatory Health Care Policies.","authors":"Gray Babbs, Hill Landon Wolfe, Michael R Ulrich, Julia Raifman, Sarah Ketchen Lipson","doi":"10.1037/sah0000459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>\"Religious conscience\" or \"healthcare denial\" policies allow healthcare providers and institutions to refuse to provide services in the name of religious freedom. Denial policies are a form of structural stigma that could impede access to healthcare for sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations, particularly SGM young adults. This study describes SGM university students' response to policies permitting healthcare providers to deny care based on their religious beliefs. Data were obtained from 8,322 SGM students at 38 colleges and universities who participated in the spring 2020 Healthy Minds Study. Descriptive statistics are reported for the level of distress due to the denial policies and likelihood to avoid identity disclosure. Over 90% of SGM students report distress knowing about denial policies (sexual minority: 6.95/10; gender minority: 8.05/10). Students also reported similarly high distress imagining that they had been denied care (sexual minority: 8.05/10; gender minority: 8.57/10). The majority of sexual (69.2%) and gender minority (82.2%) students agreed the policy would make them less likely to disclose their identity to a new provider. Experiencing, or even anticipating, discrimination in healthcare settings through denial policies has negative impacts on the health of SGM populations and has the potential to exacerbate existing mental health disparities for SGM young adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":53222,"journal":{"name":"Stigma and Health","volume":"128 1","pages":"601-604"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11759510/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stigma and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/sah0000459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

"Religious conscience" or "healthcare denial" policies allow healthcare providers and institutions to refuse to provide services in the name of religious freedom. Denial policies are a form of structural stigma that could impede access to healthcare for sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations, particularly SGM young adults. This study describes SGM university students' response to policies permitting healthcare providers to deny care based on their religious beliefs. Data were obtained from 8,322 SGM students at 38 colleges and universities who participated in the spring 2020 Healthy Minds Study. Descriptive statistics are reported for the level of distress due to the denial policies and likelihood to avoid identity disclosure. Over 90% of SGM students report distress knowing about denial policies (sexual minority: 6.95/10; gender minority: 8.05/10). Students also reported similarly high distress imagining that they had been denied care (sexual minority: 8.05/10; gender minority: 8.57/10). The majority of sexual (69.2%) and gender minority (82.2%) students agreed the policy would make them less likely to disclose their identity to a new provider. Experiencing, or even anticipating, discrimination in healthcare settings through denial policies has negative impacts on the health of SGM populations and has the potential to exacerbate existing mental health disparities for SGM young adults.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性和性别少数群体大学生报告因歧视性医疗保健政策而感到痛苦。
“宗教良心”或“拒绝医疗保健”政策允许医疗保健提供者和机构以宗教自由的名义拒绝提供服务。拒绝政策是一种结构性污名,可能阻碍性和性别少数群体(SGM)人群,特别是SGM青年获得医疗保健。本研究描述了SGM大学学生对允许医疗保健提供者基于其宗教信仰拒绝护理的政策的反应。数据来自38所高校的8322名SGM学生,他们参加了2020年春季健康心理研究。由于拒绝政策和避免身份披露的可能性,报告了描述性统计数据。超过90%的SGM学生表示在知道拒绝政策后感到痛苦(性少数:6.95/10;性别少数:8.05/10)。学生们也报告了类似的高度痛苦,想象他们被拒绝照顾(性少数群体:8.05/10;性别少数:8.57/10)。大多数性取向学生(69.2%)和少数性别学生(82.2%)认为,该政策将使他们不太可能向新的提供者透露自己的身份。在医疗保健环境中,通过拒绝政策经历甚至预期歧视会对性侵人群的健康产生负面影响,并有可能加剧性侵年轻人现有的心理健康差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Stigma and Health
Stigma and Health Multiple-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
94
期刊最新文献
Expressive Flexibility as a Buffer in the Association Between Substance Use Stigma and Drug Use Problems Among Substance-Using Individuals with Depression. "They Call Us Amaphara (Junkies)": Intersectional Tuberculosis, Alcohol, and Drug Stigma in South Africa. Interpersonal Health Care Discrimination and Delayed Alcohol Use Treatment Among Sexual Minority Adults With Multiple Stigmatized Identities. Exploring the Relationship Between Adverse Childhood Experiences and Internalized Substance Use Stigma: A Mediation Analysis Among Incarcerated Women. Global Sleep Quality among Multiracial College Students in the United States: A Brief Report of Concurrent Associations with General and Multiracial Discrimination and Negative Affect.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1