Dalia Abd El Sattar El Embaby, Mai Azab, H. Shalaby
{"title":"Analgesia and sedation strategy for mechanically ventilated patients in the respiratory ICU","authors":"Dalia Abd El Sattar El Embaby, Mai Azab, H. Shalaby","doi":"10.4103/ecdt.ecdt_81_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Mechanical ventilation is typically required for ICU patients as part of their care. This recommends the use of analgesia and sedation in a balanced strategy to alter patients’ comfort and assist synchronization with mechanical ventilation while avoiding the downsides of excessive sedation. Objective The aim of the study was to compare between deep sedation and light sedation, analgesia, and no sedation strategies and their effects on the length of mechanical ventilation, and their effects on patients’ prognosis. Patients and methods This cohort prospective pilot study was conducted at the medical respiratory ICU at Ain Shams University Hospital in Cairo, Egypt, on 54 patients separated into four groups according to the type of sedation and analgesia suited for each patient’s severity condition. Results In this study, 54 mechanically ventilated patients in respiratory ICU were recruited. The patients were divided into group 1: no sedation or analgesia, group 2: analgesia only, group 3: light sedation, and group 4: deep sedation. There was a significant difference in Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation score and severity%, although the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation score and severity % were the highest in group 1 (25.53, 55.11%) and group 4 (23.40, 47.68%), but the prognosis was poorer in group 4 and was affected by deep sedation (100% death rate) than that in group 1 (60.0%). The average infusion rate of fentanyl and the total dose were significantly different between groups, the highest being in the deep sedation group. ICU length of stay was nonsignificant between groups but it was lower in group 4 (median: 9 days) than other groups. The average rate of dormicum infusion in the deep sedation group was 5 µg, while there was no daily vacation period; so, it can be explained that higher doses of sedation and analgesia in group 4 affected their prognosis to be poorer than other groups. Delirium occurred in 80% of group 4 patients, but only in 6.7% of subgroups, indicating a highly significant difference. Complications either metabolic, cardiac, or hematologic in the postextubation period were higher in group 4 (60%), than in group 1 (47.7%), group 2 (40%), and group 3 (15%). Conclusion Light sedation and analgesia strategies with daily sedation interruption would have a better survival outcome and cause fewer issues in patients, who were on mechanical ventilation than a heavy sedation approach.","PeriodicalId":46359,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis","volume":"152 1","pages":"386 - 392"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ecdt.ecdt_81_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background Mechanical ventilation is typically required for ICU patients as part of their care. This recommends the use of analgesia and sedation in a balanced strategy to alter patients’ comfort and assist synchronization with mechanical ventilation while avoiding the downsides of excessive sedation. Objective The aim of the study was to compare between deep sedation and light sedation, analgesia, and no sedation strategies and their effects on the length of mechanical ventilation, and their effects on patients’ prognosis. Patients and methods This cohort prospective pilot study was conducted at the medical respiratory ICU at Ain Shams University Hospital in Cairo, Egypt, on 54 patients separated into four groups according to the type of sedation and analgesia suited for each patient’s severity condition. Results In this study, 54 mechanically ventilated patients in respiratory ICU were recruited. The patients were divided into group 1: no sedation or analgesia, group 2: analgesia only, group 3: light sedation, and group 4: deep sedation. There was a significant difference in Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation score and severity%, although the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation score and severity % were the highest in group 1 (25.53, 55.11%) and group 4 (23.40, 47.68%), but the prognosis was poorer in group 4 and was affected by deep sedation (100% death rate) than that in group 1 (60.0%). The average infusion rate of fentanyl and the total dose were significantly different between groups, the highest being in the deep sedation group. ICU length of stay was nonsignificant between groups but it was lower in group 4 (median: 9 days) than other groups. The average rate of dormicum infusion in the deep sedation group was 5 µg, while there was no daily vacation period; so, it can be explained that higher doses of sedation and analgesia in group 4 affected their prognosis to be poorer than other groups. Delirium occurred in 80% of group 4 patients, but only in 6.7% of subgroups, indicating a highly significant difference. Complications either metabolic, cardiac, or hematologic in the postextubation period were higher in group 4 (60%), than in group 1 (47.7%), group 2 (40%), and group 3 (15%). Conclusion Light sedation and analgesia strategies with daily sedation interruption would have a better survival outcome and cause fewer issues in patients, who were on mechanical ventilation than a heavy sedation approach.
期刊介绍:
The journal will cover technical and clinical studies related to health, ethical and social issues in field of The Egyptian Journal of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis aims to publish and inform readers and all chest physicians of the progress in medical research concerning all aspect of chest diseases. Publications include original articles review articles, editorials, case studies and reports which are relevant to chest diseases. The Journal also aims to highlight recent updates in chest medicine. . Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.