A retrospective study of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry for hepatocellular carcinoma

Min Du , Yumeng Cai , Yanrui Pang , Yuan Ji
{"title":"A retrospective study of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry for hepatocellular carcinoma","authors":"Min Du ,&nbsp;Yumeng Cai ,&nbsp;Yanrui Pang ,&nbsp;Yuan Ji","doi":"10.1016/j.iliver.2022.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression plays an important role in selecting patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who will benefit from anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 monotherapy and directing those with lower levels to alternative treatments.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In total, 156 hepatocellular carcinoma tumors were stained with three PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assays (SP142, 28-8, and E1L3N). Two junior pathologists and one senior pathologist evaluated the pathological slides and recorded the percentages of tumor and immune cells stained at any intensity.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Analytical comparisons demonstrated that the anti-PD-L1 assay SP142 is a significantly stronger reagent that stains a higher percent of both tumor and immune cells, while 28-8 and E1L3N behave similarly to each other. The correlation coefficients of the three assays ranged from 0.77 to 0.92 for tumor cells and from 0.66 to 0.75 for immune cells. Next, 1% and 5% tumor cell staining cutoffs were designated using various combinations of assays and cutoffs. Across all three reagents, 14 samples showed concordance above the 5% threshold, eight showed concordance within the range of 1% to 5% interval, and 93 showed concordance below the 1% threshold. The remaining 41 samples showed a combination of discordant results across all three reagents. High PD-L1 expression in tumor and immune cells tended to not be recurrent.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The anti-PD-L1 assays 28-8 and E1L3N were closely aligned with regard to staining tumor and immune cells, whereas SP142 showed higher percentages of staining for both cell types. All three assays indicated greater variability in immune cell staining than in tumor cells.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100657,"journal":{"name":"iLIVER","volume":"1 3","pages":"Pages 187-193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772947822000445/pdfft?md5=05fdf2a805b563dcba79064683c97efa&pid=1-s2.0-S2772947822000445-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iLIVER","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772947822000445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background

Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression plays an important role in selecting patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who will benefit from anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 monotherapy and directing those with lower levels to alternative treatments.

Methods

In total, 156 hepatocellular carcinoma tumors were stained with three PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assays (SP142, 28-8, and E1L3N). Two junior pathologists and one senior pathologist evaluated the pathological slides and recorded the percentages of tumor and immune cells stained at any intensity.

Results

Analytical comparisons demonstrated that the anti-PD-L1 assay SP142 is a significantly stronger reagent that stains a higher percent of both tumor and immune cells, while 28-8 and E1L3N behave similarly to each other. The correlation coefficients of the three assays ranged from 0.77 to 0.92 for tumor cells and from 0.66 to 0.75 for immune cells. Next, 1% and 5% tumor cell staining cutoffs were designated using various combinations of assays and cutoffs. Across all three reagents, 14 samples showed concordance above the 5% threshold, eight showed concordance within the range of 1% to 5% interval, and 93 showed concordance below the 1% threshold. The remaining 41 samples showed a combination of discordant results across all three reagents. High PD-L1 expression in tumor and immune cells tended to not be recurrent.

Conclusions

The anti-PD-L1 assays 28-8 and E1L3N were closely aligned with regard to staining tumor and immune cells, whereas SP142 showed higher percentages of staining for both cell types. All three assays indicated greater variability in immune cell staining than in tumor cells.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肝细胞癌PD-L1免疫组化的回顾性研究
程序性细胞死亡配体1 (PD-L1)表达在选择从抗程序性细胞死亡1 (PD-1)/PD-L1单药治疗中获益的肝细胞癌患者以及指导低水平患者接受替代治疗方面发挥着重要作用。方法采用3种PD-L1免疫组化方法(SP142、28-8和E1L3N)对156例肝癌进行染色。两名初级病理学家和一名高级病理学家评估病理切片,记录肿瘤和免疫细胞在任何强度下染色的百分比。结果分析比较表明,抗pd - l1检测SP142是一种明显更强的试剂,对肿瘤和免疫细胞的染色率都更高,而28-8和E1L3N的表现相似。肿瘤细胞的相关系数为0.77 ~ 0.92,免疫细胞的相关系数为0.66 ~ 0.75。接下来,使用各种测定和切断的组合指定1%和5%的肿瘤细胞染色切断。在这三种试剂中,14个样品的一致性高于5%的阈值,8个样品的一致性在1%至5%的区间内,93个样品的一致性低于1%的阈值。剩下的41个样本在所有三种试剂中显示了不一致的结果。PD-L1在肿瘤和免疫细胞中的高表达倾向于不复发。结论抗pd - l1检测28-8和E1L3N对肿瘤细胞和免疫细胞的染色密切相关,而SP142对两种细胞的染色百分比更高。所有这三种检测都表明免疫细胞染色比肿瘤细胞染色的变异性更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Duodenal varices and evaluation of endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection for treatment of duodenal variceal bleeding Detection of metabolic signatures implicated in the progression from hepatitis to cirrhosis to hepatocellular carcinoma Emerging role of natural bioactive compounds in navigating the future of liver disease New approaches to the treatment of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver with natural products WGCNA combined with machine learning to explore potential biomarkers and treatment strategies for acute liver failure, with experimental validation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1