Pseudoscientific beliefs and practices in the COVID-19 pandemic: A narrative review of unwanted experiments attributed to social media-based misinformation afflicting the public health

Senthilkumar Chinnu Sugavanam, B. Natarajan
{"title":"Pseudoscientific beliefs and practices in the COVID-19 pandemic: A narrative review of unwanted experiments attributed to social media-based misinformation afflicting the public health","authors":"Senthilkumar Chinnu Sugavanam, B. Natarajan","doi":"10.12662/2317-3076jhbs.v8i1.3394.p1-9.2020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : On January 30, 2020, India reported its first coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) positive case that led to the national lockdown, health surveillance, and travel restrictions. The Government of India (GoI) is advising personal hygiene practices as prophylaxis, however, remains poorly understood by the people. Too, believing in social media-based misinformation leading to pseudoscientific practices suggesting all from giving up non-vegetarian food to eating garlic is afflicting. This review sheds light on pseudoscientific beliefs and practices of the Indian public to prevent COVID-19. Methods : This narrative review gathered scientific evidence to describe the facts against pseudoscientific beliefs and practices in the COVID-19 pandemic. We examined available evidence from relevant research articles to present the facts about pseudoscientific practices. In particular, regarding the use of complementary and alternative medicine and its practice to prevent COVID-19, we searched the high-quality literature in PubMed, PubMed Central, and Cochrane Library databases for the determined outcomes. Results : Based on scientific shreds of evidence, it is apparent that social media-based misinformation and its pseudoscientific practices severely affecting the public health in the COVID-19 pandemic. The public must look into the facts rigorously before performing pseudoscientific practices and need to follow GoI instructions perpetually. The findings of this review suggest a high level of public awareness of evidence-based prophylactic measures. Conclusion : There is an urgent need for public health promotion initiatives to bring up awareness of the COVID-19 spread and its preventive hygiene practices. The dissemination of health awareness to the public across the nation is warranted.","PeriodicalId":16071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health & Biological Sciences","volume":"529 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health & Biological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12662/2317-3076jhbs.v8i1.3394.p1-9.2020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background : On January 30, 2020, India reported its first coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) positive case that led to the national lockdown, health surveillance, and travel restrictions. The Government of India (GoI) is advising personal hygiene practices as prophylaxis, however, remains poorly understood by the people. Too, believing in social media-based misinformation leading to pseudoscientific practices suggesting all from giving up non-vegetarian food to eating garlic is afflicting. This review sheds light on pseudoscientific beliefs and practices of the Indian public to prevent COVID-19. Methods : This narrative review gathered scientific evidence to describe the facts against pseudoscientific beliefs and practices in the COVID-19 pandemic. We examined available evidence from relevant research articles to present the facts about pseudoscientific practices. In particular, regarding the use of complementary and alternative medicine and its practice to prevent COVID-19, we searched the high-quality literature in PubMed, PubMed Central, and Cochrane Library databases for the determined outcomes. Results : Based on scientific shreds of evidence, it is apparent that social media-based misinformation and its pseudoscientific practices severely affecting the public health in the COVID-19 pandemic. The public must look into the facts rigorously before performing pseudoscientific practices and need to follow GoI instructions perpetually. The findings of this review suggest a high level of public awareness of evidence-based prophylactic measures. Conclusion : There is an urgent need for public health promotion initiatives to bring up awareness of the COVID-19 spread and its preventive hygiene practices. The dissemination of health awareness to the public across the nation is warranted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19大流行中的伪科学信仰和做法:对影响公共卫生的基于社交媒体的错误信息所导致的不受欢迎的实验的叙述性回顾
背景:2020年1月30日,印度报告了首例2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)阳性病例,导致全国封锁、健康监测和旅行限制。印度政府建议个人保持卫生习惯,因为人们对预防仍然知之甚少。同样,相信基于社交媒体的错误信息导致的伪科学行为,从放弃非素食到吃大蒜,都是令人痛苦的。这篇综述揭示了印度公众预防新冠肺炎的伪科学观念和做法。方法:本文收集科学证据,描述新冠肺炎大流行中反对伪科学观念和做法的事实。我们检查了相关研究文章中的现有证据,以呈现伪科学实践的事实。特别是,关于使用补充和替代医学及其实践来预防COVID-19,我们检索了PubMed、PubMed Central和Cochrane Library数据库中的高质量文献,以确定结果。结果:基于科学证据,基于社交媒体的虚假信息及其伪科学行为显然严重影响了新冠肺炎大流行期间的公共卫生。在进行伪科学行为之前,公众必须严格调查事实,永远遵循印度政府的指示。本综述的结果表明,公众对循证预防措施有高度的认识。结论:迫切需要开展公共卫生宣传活动,提高人们对COVID-19传播的认识和预防卫生习惯。有必要向全国公众宣传健康意识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gender Disparities of Youths in Trust on Health Management Systems during Post-COVID-19 in Bangladesh HIV AND SYPHILIS CO-INFECTION IN NORTHEAST BRAZIL: A GENDER ASSESSMENT Perfil Epidemiológico de Gatos com Esporotricose no Município de São Paulo (SP), 2011 a 2022 Effectiveness of resveratrol as a hepatoprotector in a rat model of paracetamol-induced liver injury Perfil clínico dos pacientes internados por Covid-19 na unidade de terapia intensiva
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1