Hydrological Responses to Land Use/Land Cover Changes in Koga Watershed, Upper Blue Nile, Ethiopia

Q3 Social Sciences Human Geographies Pub Date : 2023-01-10 DOI:10.3390/geographies3010004
Habitamu Alesew Ayele, Alemu O. Aga, Liuelsegad Belayneh, Tilahun Wankie Wanjala
{"title":"Hydrological Responses to Land Use/Land Cover Changes in Koga Watershed, Upper Blue Nile, Ethiopia","authors":"Habitamu Alesew Ayele, Alemu O. Aga, Liuelsegad Belayneh, Tilahun Wankie Wanjala","doi":"10.3390/geographies3010004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Information on land use and land cover modification and their related problems for the streamflow and sediment yield are crucial for spatial planners and stakeholders to devise suitable catchment resources management plans and strategies. This research sought to assess the changes in land use and land cover (LULC) effects on the streamflow and sediment yield of the Koga watershed. Landsat-5 TM, Landsat-7 ETM+, and Landsat-8 OLI data were used to create the land use and land cover maps. The LULC type identification analysis was performed by using ERDAS Imagine 2015. After the supervised classification, the land use and land cover maps for three distinct years (1991, 2008, and 2018) were generated, and the accuracy of the maps was reviewed. The LULC change analysis results were pointed out, as there was an appreciable LULC change in the study watershed. Agricultural land increased by 14.21% over the research period, whereas grassland decreased by 22.91%. The other LULC classes (built-up area, forest area, water body, and wetland) increased by 0.39%, 6.36%, 4.30%, and 0.46%, respectively. Contrarily, bushland decreased by 2.80%. Human activities were decisive in the significant land use alterations within the catchment. The flow rate of the river basin increased over the rainy season in the years 1991–2008 and declined in the drier months. The watershed’s sediment yield increased from 1991 to 2008 as a result of the extension of its agricultural area. Thus, the findings of this investigation demonstrated that the flow and sediment yield characteristics are changed because of the modifications within the LULC in the catchment. Some downstream and upstream parts of the area are exposed to comparatively high erosion, and the maximum amount of sediment is generated during the rainy season.","PeriodicalId":38507,"journal":{"name":"Human Geographies","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Geographies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/geographies3010004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Information on land use and land cover modification and their related problems for the streamflow and sediment yield are crucial for spatial planners and stakeholders to devise suitable catchment resources management plans and strategies. This research sought to assess the changes in land use and land cover (LULC) effects on the streamflow and sediment yield of the Koga watershed. Landsat-5 TM, Landsat-7 ETM+, and Landsat-8 OLI data were used to create the land use and land cover maps. The LULC type identification analysis was performed by using ERDAS Imagine 2015. After the supervised classification, the land use and land cover maps for three distinct years (1991, 2008, and 2018) were generated, and the accuracy of the maps was reviewed. The LULC change analysis results were pointed out, as there was an appreciable LULC change in the study watershed. Agricultural land increased by 14.21% over the research period, whereas grassland decreased by 22.91%. The other LULC classes (built-up area, forest area, water body, and wetland) increased by 0.39%, 6.36%, 4.30%, and 0.46%, respectively. Contrarily, bushland decreased by 2.80%. Human activities were decisive in the significant land use alterations within the catchment. The flow rate of the river basin increased over the rainy season in the years 1991–2008 and declined in the drier months. The watershed’s sediment yield increased from 1991 to 2008 as a result of the extension of its agricultural area. Thus, the findings of this investigation demonstrated that the flow and sediment yield characteristics are changed because of the modifications within the LULC in the catchment. Some downstream and upstream parts of the area are exposed to comparatively high erosion, and the maximum amount of sediment is generated during the rainy season.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃塞俄比亚上青尼罗河科加流域土地利用/土地覆盖变化的水文响应
关于土地利用和土地覆被改造及其对河流和产沙的相关问题的信息对于空间规划者和利益相关者制定合适的流域资源管理计划和战略至关重要。本研究旨在评估古贺流域土地利用和土地覆盖变化对河流和产沙量的影响。利用Landsat-5 TM、Landsat-7 ETM+和Landsat-8 OLI数据制作土地利用和土地覆盖图。使用ERDAS Imagine 2015进行LULC类型识别分析。经监督分类后,生成了1991年、2008年和2018年3个不同年份的土地利用和土地覆被图,并对其精度进行了评价。指出了研究流域土地利用价值变化分析结果,表明研究流域土地利用价值变化明显。农用地增加14.21%,草地减少22.91%。其他类型(建成区、林地、水体和湿地)的LULC分别增加了0.39%、6.36%、4.30%和0.46%。相反,灌木林减少了2.80%。人类活动是流域土地利用变化的决定性因素。1991-2008年,流域流量在雨季增加,在旱季下降。1991年至2008年,由于农业面积的扩大,流域的产沙量有所增加。因此,本研究结果表明,由于流域内LULC的变化,径流和产沙特征发生了变化。该地区部分上下游地区受侵蚀程度较高,雨季产沙量最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Human Geographies
Human Geographies Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Residents and Stakeholder Opinions on Township Tourism in Langa, Cape Town, South Africa Spatio-Temporal Dynamics and Physico-Hydrological Trends in Rainfall, Runoff and Land Use in Paraíba Watershed Perspectives on Advanced Technologies in Spatial Data Collection and Analysis Contemporary Challenges in Destination Planning: A Geographical Typology Approach Spatiotemporal Dengue Fever Incidence Associated with Climate in a Brazilian Tropical Region
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1