Characteristics of remote teamwork among clinical research company employees

IF 1.5 4区 经济学 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE International Journal of Health Economics and Management Pub Date : 2021-03-14 DOI:10.14748/HEM.V20I2.7677
K. Dimitrova
{"title":"Characteristics of remote teamwork among clinical research company employees","authors":"K. Dimitrova","doi":"10.14748/HEM.V20I2.7677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Remote work is increasingly common in our times due to globalization and the revolutionary development of digital technologies. Utilizing skills such for communicating, collaborating and efficient work in the virtual environment is important for the proper functioning of teams and for the whole organization. Therefore, it is necessary to implement strategies that supports virtual teamwork and the individual performance of employees. Material and methods: Research literature on the research problem was studied and analyzed. Sociological methods were utilized to collect and analyze empirical data. An individual anonymous online questionnaire was deployed containing 29 questions: 22 closed and 7 open-ended. The respondents are employees of a clinical research company, working remotely and on site at the office located in the city of Sofia. The total number of surveyed employees is 109. A quantitative descriptive analysis of the survey data was performed. Results and discussion: The number of employees working remotely in the surveyed organization has increased by 75% from the start of the quarantine measures. Most of them have had no difficulties in adapting, and the quality of teamwork has even improved. No significant difficulties that would negatively affect teamwork and individual performance were reported. Most employees have managed to achieve a balance between personal and professional life, and even prefer remote work to working only on site at the office. Conclusion: Although some employees experience difficulties working remotely, the positive effects of the change are significantly greater. Based on the given recommendations, strategies can be developed in the organization to support the effectiveness of remote teamwork.","PeriodicalId":44403,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Economics and Management","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Economics and Management","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14748/HEM.V20I2.7677","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Remote work is increasingly common in our times due to globalization and the revolutionary development of digital technologies. Utilizing skills such for communicating, collaborating and efficient work in the virtual environment is important for the proper functioning of teams and for the whole organization. Therefore, it is necessary to implement strategies that supports virtual teamwork and the individual performance of employees. Material and methods: Research literature on the research problem was studied and analyzed. Sociological methods were utilized to collect and analyze empirical data. An individual anonymous online questionnaire was deployed containing 29 questions: 22 closed and 7 open-ended. The respondents are employees of a clinical research company, working remotely and on site at the office located in the city of Sofia. The total number of surveyed employees is 109. A quantitative descriptive analysis of the survey data was performed. Results and discussion: The number of employees working remotely in the surveyed organization has increased by 75% from the start of the quarantine measures. Most of them have had no difficulties in adapting, and the quality of teamwork has even improved. No significant difficulties that would negatively affect teamwork and individual performance were reported. Most employees have managed to achieve a balance between personal and professional life, and even prefer remote work to working only on site at the office. Conclusion: Although some employees experience difficulties working remotely, the positive effects of the change are significantly greater. Based on the given recommendations, strategies can be developed in the organization to support the effectiveness of remote teamwork.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床研究公司员工远程团队合作特征
由于全球化和数字技术的革命性发展,远程工作在我们这个时代越来越普遍。在虚拟环境中利用沟通、协作和高效工作等技能对于团队和整个组织的正常运作非常重要。因此,有必要实施支持虚拟团队合作和员工个人绩效的战略。材料和方法:对研究问题的研究文献进行研究和分析。运用社会学方法收集和分析实证数据。一份个人匿名在线调查问卷包含29个问题:22个封闭式问题和7个开放式问题。受访者是一家临床研究公司的员工,他们在索非亚市的办公室远程和现场工作。被调查的员工总数为109人。对调查数据进行定量描述性分析。结果和讨论:自隔离措施开始以来,被调查组织中远程工作的员工数量增加了75%。他们中的大多数人在适应方面没有困难,团队合作的质量甚至有所提高。没有重大困难会对团队合作和个人表现产生负面影响。大多数员工都设法在个人生活和职业生活之间取得平衡,甚至更喜欢远程工作,而不是只在办公室工作。结论:尽管一些员工在远程工作中遇到了困难,但这种变化的积极影响明显更大。根据给出的建议,可以在组织中制定策略,以支持远程团队合作的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: The focus of the International Journal of Health Economics and Management is on health care systems and on the behavior of consumers, patients, and providers of such services. The links among management, public policy, payment, and performance are core topics of the relaunched journal. The demand for health care and its cost remain central concerns. Even as medical innovation allows providers to improve the lives of their patients, questions remain about how to efficiently deliver health care services, how to pay for it, and who should pay for it. These are central questions facing innovators, providers, and payers in the public and private sectors. One key to answering these questions is to understand how people choose among alternative arrangements, either in markets or through the political process. The choices made by healthcare managers concerning the organization and production of that care are also crucial. There is an important connection between the management of a health care system and its economic performance. The primary audience for this journal will be health economists and researchers in health management, along with the larger group of health services researchers. In addition, research and policy analysis reported in the journal should be of interest to health care providers, managers and policymakers, who need to know about the pressures facing insurers and governments, with consequences for regulation and mandates. The editors of the journal encourage submissions that analyze the behavior and interaction of the actors in health care, viz. consumers, providers, insurers, and governments. Preference will be given to contributions that combine theoretical with empirical work, evaluate conflicting findings, present new information, or compare experiences between countries and jurisdictions. In addition to conventional research articles, the journal will include specific subsections for shorter concise research findings and cont ributions to management and policy that provide important descriptive data or arguments about what policies follow from research findings. The composition of the editorial board is designed to cover the range of interest among economics and management researchers.Officially cited as: Int J Health Econ ManagFrom 2001 to 2014 the journal was published as International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics. (Articles published in Vol. 1-14 officially cited as: Int J Health Care Finance Econ)
期刊最新文献
Equity and efficiency effects of flat premiums. Can health financing programmes reduce food insecurity in a developing country? Estimating price elasticities of demand for pain relief drugs: evidence from Medicare Part D. Internet use, dietary habits and adolescent obesity: evidence from China. The pharmaceutical distributors' efficiency in Italy: an assessment of the impact of the 2010 reimbursable drug pricing reform.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1