ClDiff: Generating Concise Linked Code Differences

Kaifeng Huang, Bihuan Chen, Xin Peng, Daihong Zhou, Y. Wang, Yang Liu, Wenyun Zhao
{"title":"ClDiff: Generating Concise Linked Code Differences","authors":"Kaifeng Huang, Bihuan Chen, Xin Peng, Daihong Zhou, Y. Wang, Yang Liu, Wenyun Zhao","doi":"10.1145/3238147.3238219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Analyzing and understanding source code changes is important in a variety of software maintenance tasks. To this end, many code differencing and code change summarization methods have been proposed. For some tasks (e.g. code review and software merging), however, those differencing methods generate too fine-grained a representation of code changes, and those summarization methods generate too coarse-grained a representation of code changes. Moreover, they do not consider the relationships among code changes. Therefore, the generated differences or summaries make it not easy to analyze and understand code changes in some software maintenance tasks. In this paper, we propose a code differencing approach, named ClDiff, to generate concise linked code differences whose granularity is in between the existing code differencing and code change summarization methods. The goal of ClDiff is to generate more easily understandable code differences. ClDiff takes source code files before and after changes as inputs, and consists of three steps. First, it pre-processes the source code files by pruning unchanged declarations from the parsed abstract syntax trees. Second, it generates concise code differences by grouping fine-grained code differences at or above the statement level and describing high-level changes in each group. Third, it links the related concise code differences according to five pre-defined links. Experiments with 12 Java projects (74,387 commits) and a human study with 10 participants have indicated the accuracy, conciseness, performance and usefulness of ClDiff.","PeriodicalId":6622,"journal":{"name":"2018 33rd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)","volume":"17 1","pages":"679-690"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 33rd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3238147.3238219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

Analyzing and understanding source code changes is important in a variety of software maintenance tasks. To this end, many code differencing and code change summarization methods have been proposed. For some tasks (e.g. code review and software merging), however, those differencing methods generate too fine-grained a representation of code changes, and those summarization methods generate too coarse-grained a representation of code changes. Moreover, they do not consider the relationships among code changes. Therefore, the generated differences or summaries make it not easy to analyze and understand code changes in some software maintenance tasks. In this paper, we propose a code differencing approach, named ClDiff, to generate concise linked code differences whose granularity is in between the existing code differencing and code change summarization methods. The goal of ClDiff is to generate more easily understandable code differences. ClDiff takes source code files before and after changes as inputs, and consists of three steps. First, it pre-processes the source code files by pruning unchanged declarations from the parsed abstract syntax trees. Second, it generates concise code differences by grouping fine-grained code differences at or above the statement level and describing high-level changes in each group. Third, it links the related concise code differences according to five pre-defined links. Experiments with 12 Java projects (74,387 commits) and a human study with 10 participants have indicated the accuracy, conciseness, performance and usefulness of ClDiff.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ClDiff:生成简洁的链接代码差异
在各种软件维护任务中,分析和理解源代码更改非常重要。为此,人们提出了许多代码区分和代码变更汇总方法。然而,对于某些任务(例如代码审查和软件合并),那些差异方法生成的代码更改表示过于细粒度,而那些汇总方法生成的代码更改表示过于粗粒度。此外,它们没有考虑代码变更之间的关系。因此,在一些软件维护任务中,生成的差异或汇总使得分析和理解代码更改变得不容易。在本文中,我们提出了一种名为ClDiff的代码差异方法来生成简洁的链接代码差异,其粒度介于现有的代码差异和代码变化汇总方法之间。ClDiff的目标是生成更容易理解的代码差异。ClDiff将更改前后的源代码文件作为输入,它由三个步骤组成。首先,它通过从解析的抽象语法树中修剪未更改的声明来预处理源代码文件。其次,它通过在语句级别或语句级别以上对细粒度的代码差异进行分组,并描述每组中的高级更改,从而生成简洁的代码差异。第三,根据五个预定义的链接链接相关的简洁代码差异。12个Java项目(74,387次提交)的实验和10个参与者的人类研究表明了ClDiff的准确性、简洁性、性能和实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Automatically Testing Implementations of Numerical Abstract Domains Self-Protection of Android Systems from Inter-component Communication Attacks Characterizing the Natural Language Descriptions in Software Logging Statements DroidMate-2: A Platform for Android Test Generation CPA-SymExec: Efficient Symbolic Execution in CPAchecker
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1