Kepastian Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa oleh Majelis Adat Setikar Kampung dalam Sistem Peradilan Indonesia

Jurnal IUS Pub Date : 2022-11-13 DOI:10.35308/jic.v6i2.6210
Jefrie Maulana, Muharrir Muharrir, Muhammad Nahyan Zulfikar
{"title":"Kepastian Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa oleh Majelis Adat Setikar Kampung dalam Sistem Peradilan Indonesia","authors":"Jefrie Maulana, Muharrir Muharrir, Muhammad Nahyan Zulfikar","doi":"10.35308/jic.v6i2.6210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Settlement of disputes between residents in Aceh Tamiang Regency was organized by the Setikar Village Council (MDSK) as a village deliberation body, which was later better known by the community through mediation through village traditional apparatus. This study aims to find out and explain how the procedures for resolving disputes between communities by MDSK, and analyze the legal certainty of dispute resolution between communities by MDSK in the Indonesian Judicial system. The research method of this study is normative juridical research by examining aspects of legal certainty in dispute resolution by the Aceh Tamiang District MDSK in the Indonesian justice system. The legal materials used consist of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The approach taken in this research is the approach to legislation and the approach to the principle of legal certainty. The research data will be analyzed qualitatively in accordance with the legislation and conformity with the principle of legal certainty. The results of the study indicate that out-of-court dispute resolution in Aceh Tamiang District is organized by MDSK. The dispute resolution process is carried out by examining initial data related to the subject of the dispute, examining documentary evidence and adjusting it in the field, then making decisions by deliberation and consensus. Dispute resolution by MDSK has not met the principle of legal certainty. Because, MDSK does not have legality as a mediation forum and is not recognized as a mediator as regulated in Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Court. Then, there are no implementing regulations in the form of guidelines for dispute resolution through MDSK, standard rules for implementation procedures and dispute resolution procedures. ","PeriodicalId":34628,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal IUS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal IUS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35308/jic.v6i2.6210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Settlement of disputes between residents in Aceh Tamiang Regency was organized by the Setikar Village Council (MDSK) as a village deliberation body, which was later better known by the community through mediation through village traditional apparatus. This study aims to find out and explain how the procedures for resolving disputes between communities by MDSK, and analyze the legal certainty of dispute resolution between communities by MDSK in the Indonesian Judicial system. The research method of this study is normative juridical research by examining aspects of legal certainty in dispute resolution by the Aceh Tamiang District MDSK in the Indonesian justice system. The legal materials used consist of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The approach taken in this research is the approach to legislation and the approach to the principle of legal certainty. The research data will be analyzed qualitatively in accordance with the legislation and conformity with the principle of legal certainty. The results of the study indicate that out-of-court dispute resolution in Aceh Tamiang District is organized by MDSK. The dispute resolution process is carried out by examining initial data related to the subject of the dispute, examining documentary evidence and adjusting it in the field, then making decisions by deliberation and consensus. Dispute resolution by MDSK has not met the principle of legal certainty. Because, MDSK does not have legality as a mediation forum and is not recognized as a mediator as regulated in Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Court. Then, there are no implementing regulations in the form of guidelines for dispute resolution through MDSK, standard rules for implementation procedures and dispute resolution procedures. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚齐Tamiang县居民之间的争端由Setikar村委员会(MDSK)组织解决,该委员会是一个村庄审议机构,后来通过村庄传统机构进行调解,为社区所熟知。本研究旨在找出并解释MDSK如何解决社区间纠纷的程序,并分析印尼司法系统中MDSK解决社区间纠纷的法律确定性。本研究的研究方法是规范性的司法研究,通过检查印度尼西亚司法系统中亚齐塔米昂地区MDSK解决争端的法律确定性方面。所使用的法律材料包括一级、二级和三级法律材料。本研究采用的方法是立法方法和法律确定性原则的方法。研究数据将根据立法定性分析,并符合法律确定性原则。研究结果表明,亚齐Tamiang地区的庭外纠纷解决是由MDSK组织的。争议解决过程是通过审查与争议主题相关的初始数据,审查书面证据并在现场进行调整,然后通过审议和协商一致作出决定来进行的。MDSK的争议解决不符合法律确定性原则。因为,MDSK不具有作为调解论坛的合法性,也不被认可为最高法院关于法院调解程序的2016年第1号条例规定的调解员。其次,没有通过MDSK解决争议的指南、执行程序和争议解决程序的标准规则等实施细则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
ISPO Policy on Palm Oil Industry and Biodiesel Development in North Aceh Guidance Concept for Convicts in Penitentiary as Legal Means to Minimize Narcotics Abuse Maximum Limitation of Fines for Economic Crimes In Law Number 1 of 2023 The Future of Sex Robots in Indonesia: Law, Science, And Technology Pancasila's Economic Existence in Business Development: The Efforts to Realize Justice in Business Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1