Is Vagal Response During Left Atrial Ganglionated Plexi Stimulation a Normal Phenomenon?: Comparison Between Patients With and Without Atrial Fibrillation.

Kazuki Iso, Y. Okumura, I. Watanabe, Koichi Nagashima, Keiko Takahashi, M. Arai, Ryuta Watanabe, Yuji Wakamatsu, Naoto Otsuka, S. Yagyu, Sayaka Kurokawa, T. Nakai, Kimie Ohkubo, A. Hirayama
{"title":"Is Vagal Response During Left Atrial Ganglionated Plexi Stimulation a Normal Phenomenon?: Comparison Between Patients With and Without Atrial Fibrillation.","authors":"Kazuki Iso, Y. Okumura, I. Watanabe, Koichi Nagashima, Keiko Takahashi, M. Arai, Ryuta Watanabe, Yuji Wakamatsu, Naoto Otsuka, S. Yagyu, Sayaka Kurokawa, T. Nakai, Kimie Ohkubo, A. Hirayama","doi":"10.1161/CIRCEP.118.007281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nGanglionated plexi (GPs) play an important role in both the initiation and maintenance of atrial fibrillation (AF). GPs can be located by using continuous high-frequency stimulation (HFS) to elicit a vagal response, but whether the vagal response phenomenon is common to patients without AF is unknown.\n\n\nMETHODS\nHFS of the left atrial GPs was performed in 42 patients (aged 58.0±10.2 years) undergoing ablation for AF and 21 patients (aged 53.2±12.8 years) undergoing ablation for a left-sided accessory pathway. The HFS (20 Hz, 25 mA, 10-ms pulse duration) was applied for 5 seconds at 3 sites within the presumed anatomic area of each of the 5 major left atrial GPs (for a total of 15 sites per patient). We defined vagal response to HFS as prolongation of the R-R interval by >50% in comparison to the mean pre-HFS R-R interval averaged over 10 beats and active-GP areas as areas in which a vagal response was elicited.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOverall, more active-GP areas were found in the AF group patients than in the non-AF group patients, and at all 5 major GPs, the maximum R-R interval during HFS was significantly prolonged in the AF patients. After multivariate adjustment, association was established between the total number of vagal response sites and the presence of AF. Conclusions The significant increase in vagal responses elicited in patients with AF compared with responses in non-AF patients suggests that vagal responses to HFS reflect abnormally increased GP activity specific to AF substrates.","PeriodicalId":10167,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.118.007281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

BACKGROUND Ganglionated plexi (GPs) play an important role in both the initiation and maintenance of atrial fibrillation (AF). GPs can be located by using continuous high-frequency stimulation (HFS) to elicit a vagal response, but whether the vagal response phenomenon is common to patients without AF is unknown. METHODS HFS of the left atrial GPs was performed in 42 patients (aged 58.0±10.2 years) undergoing ablation for AF and 21 patients (aged 53.2±12.8 years) undergoing ablation for a left-sided accessory pathway. The HFS (20 Hz, 25 mA, 10-ms pulse duration) was applied for 5 seconds at 3 sites within the presumed anatomic area of each of the 5 major left atrial GPs (for a total of 15 sites per patient). We defined vagal response to HFS as prolongation of the R-R interval by >50% in comparison to the mean pre-HFS R-R interval averaged over 10 beats and active-GP areas as areas in which a vagal response was elicited. RESULTS Overall, more active-GP areas were found in the AF group patients than in the non-AF group patients, and at all 5 major GPs, the maximum R-R interval during HFS was significantly prolonged in the AF patients. After multivariate adjustment, association was established between the total number of vagal response sites and the presence of AF. Conclusions The significant increase in vagal responses elicited in patients with AF compared with responses in non-AF patients suggests that vagal responses to HFS reflect abnormally increased GP activity specific to AF substrates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
左心房神经节丛刺激时迷走神经反应是正常现象吗?:心房颤动患者与非心房颤动患者的比较。
背景:神经节丛(gp)在心房颤动(AF)的发生和维持中都起着重要作用。GPs可以通过使用连续高频刺激(HFS)引起迷走神经反应来定位,但迷走神经反应现象是否在非房颤患者中普遍存在尚不清楚。方法对42例房颤消融患者(年龄58.0±10.2岁)和21例左侧辅助通路消融患者(年龄53.2±12.8岁)进行左房gp shfs。HFS (20 Hz, 25 mA, 10 ms脉冲持续时间)在5个主要左心房gp的假定解剖区域内的3个位置施加5秒(每个患者总共15个位置)。我们将迷走神经对HFS的反应定义为与HFS前平均超过10拍的R-R间隔相比,R-R间隔延长了bbbb50 %,活跃gp区是迷走神经反应被激发的区域。结果总体而言,AF组患者的gp活跃区多于非AF组患者,并且在所有5个主要gp中,AF患者HFS期间的最大R-R间隔均显着延长。经多因素调整后,迷走神经反应位点总数与房颤存在之间建立了关联。结论与非房颤患者相比,房颤患者引起的迷走神经反应显著增加,表明迷走神经对HFS的反应反映了房颤底物特异性GP活性异常增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Coronary Sinus Metabolite 12,13-diHOME Is a Novel Biomarker for Left Atrial Remodeling in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Impact of Contact Force on Pulsed Field Ablation Outcomes Using Focal Point Catheter Characteristics of Right-Sided Accessory Pathways Associated With Right Cardiac Veins Prognostic Impact of Sinus Rhythm in Atrial Fibrillation Patients: Separating Rhythm Outcomes From Randomized Strategy Findings From the CABANA Trial Trends Favoring an Anatomical Approach to Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmias Originating From the Left Ventricular Summit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1