Northern Ireland

Kerry O'Halloran
{"title":"Northern Ireland","authors":"Kerry O'Halloran","doi":"10.1177/03085759211025659a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ings that the children’s welfare was best served by them remaining in K’s care but subject to care orders. There does not seem to have been any doubt that K could not be approved as a foster carer (it was not one of those cases where the court could ask the local authority to support the carer to allow them to be approved) and so the local authority could only lawfully make a placement with him under the ‘Placement with P’ chapter (Part 4, Chapter 1) of the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (England) Regulations 2010. P is defined as (a) a parent, (b) someone with parental responsibility or (c) a person named as someone with whom the child is to live in a child arrangements order, in force immediately before the making of the care order. In the circumstances of this case there was no other way of K acquiring PR. He was not the children’s biological or legal father and was no longer their stepfather, having been divorced from their mother. It might have been possible to make a child arrangements order within the proceedings to allow K to fall within the definition of ‘P’. However, this might have been even more convoluted than the making of an SGO immediately followed by a care order to allow the SGO to be treated as preexisting; and the parental responsibility this acquired would not have survived the making of the care order. There has been significant discussion about the making of SGOs combined with supervision orders, with a logical difficulty in most cases of granting the carer overriding parental responsibility but at the same time requiring the local authority to supervise the child’s welfare. The President’s Guidance (2020) suggests that the combination of those orders should be a ‘red flag’, suggesting a lack of confidence in the SGO and that there will only be a very small number of cases where an SGO and supervision order together will be appropriate. There has been no similar discussion about the making of a care order and SGO at the same time because it does not seem to have been considered as an option before (or at least not in reported cases). It may be time to start that discussion.","PeriodicalId":92743,"journal":{"name":"Adoption & fostering","volume":"4 1","pages":"218 - 222"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adoption & fostering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03085759211025659a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ings that the children’s welfare was best served by them remaining in K’s care but subject to care orders. There does not seem to have been any doubt that K could not be approved as a foster carer (it was not one of those cases where the court could ask the local authority to support the carer to allow them to be approved) and so the local authority could only lawfully make a placement with him under the ‘Placement with P’ chapter (Part 4, Chapter 1) of the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (England) Regulations 2010. P is defined as (a) a parent, (b) someone with parental responsibility or (c) a person named as someone with whom the child is to live in a child arrangements order, in force immediately before the making of the care order. In the circumstances of this case there was no other way of K acquiring PR. He was not the children’s biological or legal father and was no longer their stepfather, having been divorced from their mother. It might have been possible to make a child arrangements order within the proceedings to allow K to fall within the definition of ‘P’. However, this might have been even more convoluted than the making of an SGO immediately followed by a care order to allow the SGO to be treated as preexisting; and the parental responsibility this acquired would not have survived the making of the care order. There has been significant discussion about the making of SGOs combined with supervision orders, with a logical difficulty in most cases of granting the carer overriding parental responsibility but at the same time requiring the local authority to supervise the child’s welfare. The President’s Guidance (2020) suggests that the combination of those orders should be a ‘red flag’, suggesting a lack of confidence in the SGO and that there will only be a very small number of cases where an SGO and supervision order together will be appropriate. There has been no similar discussion about the making of a care order and SGO at the same time because it does not seem to have been considered as an option before (or at least not in reported cases). It may be time to start that discussion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
北爱尔兰
认为儿童的福利最好由K继续照顾,但须遵守照顾令。似乎没有任何疑问,K不能被批准为寄养照顾者(这不是法院可以要求地方当局支持照顾者允许他们被批准的那些案件之一),因此地方当局只能根据2010年护理计划,安置和案件审查(英格兰)条例的“安置P”章节(第4部分,第1章)合法地安置他。P被定义为(a)父母、(b)负有父母责任的人或(c)在紧接该照顾令作出前生效的儿童安排令中指定与该儿童同住的人。在这种情况下,K没有其他途径获得永久居留权。他不是孩子们的生父或法定父亲,也不再是他们的继父,因为他已经和他们的母亲离婚了。本可以在诉讼程序中作出儿童安排令,使K符合“P”的定义。然而,这可能比立即制作SGO然后发出护理令以允许SGO被视为既存的情况更复杂;这种获得的父母责任在看护令下达后就不复存在了。关于将社会福利组织与监督令相结合的做法,人们进行了大量的讨论,在大多数情况下,逻辑上存在困难,即赋予照顾者高于父母的责任,但同时要求地方当局监督儿童的福利。《总统指导意见(2020年)》表明,这些命令的组合应该是一个“危险信号”,表明对SGO缺乏信心,并且只有极少数情况下SGO和监督命令一起是合适的。关于同时制定护理令和SGO没有类似的讨论,因为以前似乎没有将其视为一种选择(或至少在报告的病例中没有)。也许是时候开始讨论这个问题了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A heavy weight, yet empowering: Grandparent Special Guardians’ lived experiences of the role and family dynamics - An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) When people adopted from severely depriving institutions become parents: The experiences of young adult mothers from the ERA study and their adoptive parents Interrupting a cycle of placement instability with short-term residential care: Trauma-informed family-like relational practice in one specialist unit Deinstitutionalisation: A global effort to improve developmental outcomes for children A Compassion-Focused Therapy group for young people who live in foster, adoptive or kinship care: Initial development, reflections, and ways forward
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1