Comparison of Outcomes with Triple-Regimen versus Double-Regimen Transarterial Chemoembolization

A. Smolock, Osmani Deochand, W. Rilling, P. Patel, E. Hohenwalter, S. White, M. Scheidt
{"title":"Comparison of Outcomes with Triple-Regimen versus Double-Regimen Transarterial Chemoembolization","authors":"A. Smolock, Osmani Deochand, W. Rilling, P. Patel, E. Hohenwalter, S. White, M. Scheidt","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1756460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We sought to evaluate differences in outcomes between double versus triple transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). TACEs over a 1-year period were retrospectively reviewed and divided into two groups: double and triple. Imaging response and complications were made on a per-procedure basis. Student's t -test was used to calculate differences in continuous variables, and chi-square test was used to calculate differences in categorical values.Overall tumor response was similar between the two groups, and there were no significant differences in complications between groups. Outcomes are similar between double and triple conventional TACE, suggesting that adding a third drug may only contribute to cost.","PeriodicalId":91014,"journal":{"name":"Digestive disease interventions","volume":"55 1","pages":"159 - 162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive disease interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1756460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract We sought to evaluate differences in outcomes between double versus triple transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). TACEs over a 1-year period were retrospectively reviewed and divided into two groups: double and triple. Imaging response and complications were made on a per-procedure basis. Student's t -test was used to calculate differences in continuous variables, and chi-square test was used to calculate differences in categorical values.Overall tumor response was similar between the two groups, and there were no significant differences in complications between groups. Outcomes are similar between double and triple conventional TACE, suggesting that adding a third drug may only contribute to cost.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三方案与双方案经动脉化疗栓塞的疗效比较
我们试图评估两次和三次经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)结果的差异。回顾性分析1年期间的tace,分为两组:两组和三组。影像学反应和并发症以每次手术为基础。连续变量间的差异采用学生t检验,分类值间的差异采用卡方检验。两组总体肿瘤反应相似,两组并发症无显著差异。两倍和三倍常规TACE的结果相似,这表明添加第三种药物可能只会增加成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Management of Unresectable Cholangiocarcinoma Using Modern Radiation Therapy Techniques Plug-Assisted Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration: A Modified Balloon-Occluded Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration of Gastric Varices Developing an Interventional Radiology Service Role of Interventional Radiology in the Management of Liver Transplant Complications in Children Pediatric Liver Interventions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1