Compressive Strength and Durability of Geopolymer Concrete

Haitham A. Badrawi, Hisham Y. Makahleh, Rami A. Haweileh
{"title":"Compressive Strength and Durability of Geopolymer Concrete","authors":"Haitham A. Badrawi, Hisham Y. Makahleh, Rami A. Haweileh","doi":"10.1109/ASET53988.2022.9734934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The impacts of using Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBFS) and fly ash as a replacement to Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) are evaluated. A total of 120 concrete cubic and cylindrical samples were casted and tested for four different binder compositions. Compressive strength testing conducted on cubes and cylinders at various ages revealed that incorporation of fly ash as binder reduces the compressive strength at various ages. In addition, it is also observed that geopolymer concrete provides late strength gain which is a major drawback of the usage of such concrete. Furthermore, it was noted that GGBFS- and fly ash- based concrete gain compressive strength at later ages compared to conventional concrete. This is due to the late activation process. On the other hand, durability testing of geopolymer concrete, represented by rapid chloride penetration test (RCPT), suggests that replacing OPC with GGBFS and fly ash in concrete provides massive improvements in durability at the various testing ages. In contrast, adding further fly ash reduces overall durability by increasing the water absorbed and water penetration depth. Finally, it is concluded that environment friendly materials such as GGBFS and fly ash can serve as appropriate alternatives to OPC in the binding material of concrete mixes.","PeriodicalId":6832,"journal":{"name":"2022 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET)","volume":"303 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASET53988.2022.9734934","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The impacts of using Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBFS) and fly ash as a replacement to Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) are evaluated. A total of 120 concrete cubic and cylindrical samples were casted and tested for four different binder compositions. Compressive strength testing conducted on cubes and cylinders at various ages revealed that incorporation of fly ash as binder reduces the compressive strength at various ages. In addition, it is also observed that geopolymer concrete provides late strength gain which is a major drawback of the usage of such concrete. Furthermore, it was noted that GGBFS- and fly ash- based concrete gain compressive strength at later ages compared to conventional concrete. This is due to the late activation process. On the other hand, durability testing of geopolymer concrete, represented by rapid chloride penetration test (RCPT), suggests that replacing OPC with GGBFS and fly ash in concrete provides massive improvements in durability at the various testing ages. In contrast, adding further fly ash reduces overall durability by increasing the water absorbed and water penetration depth. Finally, it is concluded that environment friendly materials such as GGBFS and fly ash can serve as appropriate alternatives to OPC in the binding material of concrete mixes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地聚合物混凝土的抗压强度和耐久性
评价了用矿渣粉和粉煤灰替代普通硅酸盐水泥的效果。共浇铸了120个混凝土立方体和圆柱形样品,并对四种不同的粘结剂成分进行了测试。不同龄期的立方体和圆柱体抗压强度试验表明,掺入粉煤灰作为粘结剂降低了不同龄期的抗压强度。此外,还观察到地聚合物混凝土提供后期强度增益,这是使用此类混凝土的主要缺点。此外,值得注意的是,与传统混凝土相比,GGBFS和粉煤灰基混凝土在较晚的龄期获得抗压强度。这是由于激活过程较晚。另一方面,以快速氯化物渗透试验(RCPT)为代表的地聚合物混凝土耐久性试验表明,在不同的试验龄期,用GGBFS和粉煤灰替代OPC可以显著提高混凝土的耐久性。相比之下,进一步添加粉煤灰会增加吸水率和水渗透深度,从而降低整体耐久性。最后,得出了GGBFS和粉煤灰等环保材料可以作为OPC的合适替代品作为混凝土配合料的结合材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Numerical computing in engineering mathematics A Model for Solar Home System Assessment in Public Housing Projects in the United Arab Emirates A hybrid photovoltaic/solar chimney seawater desalination plant Comparative Study Investigating Compressed Natural Gas, Diesel, and Gasoline as Fuel for the Transportation Sector: A Case of UAE Impact of Urbanisation on Surface Temperature using Satellite and Ground Observations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1