Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: Medical Therapy With or Without Revascularization

DeckerMed Medicine Pub Date : 2019-08-26 DOI:10.2310/im.1488
A. Sarraju, D. Maron
{"title":"Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: Medical Therapy With or Without Revascularization","authors":"A. Sarraju, D. Maron","doi":"10.2310/im.1488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Coronary artery disease (CAD) poses a significant global public health burden. Patients with CAD who do not present with acute coronary syndromes are considered to have stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD). Options for the management of SIHD are medical therapy including pharmacologic therapy and lifestyle modification and revascularization with either percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Guideline-directed medical therapy is recommended for all patients with SIHD. Aside from severe stenosis in an unprotected left main coronary artery, the role of routine revascularization in the management of SIHD is unclear. Early CABG trials from the 1970s and 1980s demonstrated prognostic benefit with CABG versus medical therapy, but these results have limited applicability in the setting of modern medical therapy, including the widespread use of statins and aspirin and intensive lifestyle interventions. Contemporary strategy trials examining PCI plus medical therapy versus medical therapy alone have not demonstrated prognostic benefit with the addition of PCI. The addition of revascularization offers consistent symptom and quality-of-life benefit compared with medical therapy alone based on trial data, though this benefit may be time limited with PCI. Thus, there is a state of equipoise regarding the addition of revascularization to guideline-directed medical therapy in the management of SIHD. Therefore, shared decision-making is key when determining the best management strategy for a patient with SIHD and should include discussion of expected risks and benefits based on high-quality evidence, costs, and patient preferences.\nThis review contains 6 figures, 8 tables, and 55 references. \nKey Words: angina, antianginal therapy, coronary artery disease, coronary artery bypass grafting, guideline-directed medical therapy, ischemia, optimal medical therapy, percutaneous coronary intervention, revascularization","PeriodicalId":11220,"journal":{"name":"DeckerMed Medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DeckerMed Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2310/im.1488","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coronary artery disease (CAD) poses a significant global public health burden. Patients with CAD who do not present with acute coronary syndromes are considered to have stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD). Options for the management of SIHD are medical therapy including pharmacologic therapy and lifestyle modification and revascularization with either percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Guideline-directed medical therapy is recommended for all patients with SIHD. Aside from severe stenosis in an unprotected left main coronary artery, the role of routine revascularization in the management of SIHD is unclear. Early CABG trials from the 1970s and 1980s demonstrated prognostic benefit with CABG versus medical therapy, but these results have limited applicability in the setting of modern medical therapy, including the widespread use of statins and aspirin and intensive lifestyle interventions. Contemporary strategy trials examining PCI plus medical therapy versus medical therapy alone have not demonstrated prognostic benefit with the addition of PCI. The addition of revascularization offers consistent symptom and quality-of-life benefit compared with medical therapy alone based on trial data, though this benefit may be time limited with PCI. Thus, there is a state of equipoise regarding the addition of revascularization to guideline-directed medical therapy in the management of SIHD. Therefore, shared decision-making is key when determining the best management strategy for a patient with SIHD and should include discussion of expected risks and benefits based on high-quality evidence, costs, and patient preferences. This review contains 6 figures, 8 tables, and 55 references.  Key Words: angina, antianginal therapy, coronary artery disease, coronary artery bypass grafting, guideline-directed medical therapy, ischemia, optimal medical therapy, percutaneous coronary intervention, revascularization
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
稳定性缺血性心脏病:伴或不伴血运重建的药物治疗
冠状动脉疾病(CAD)是一个重大的全球公共卫生负担。没有出现急性冠状动脉综合征的冠心病患者被认为患有稳定型缺血性心脏病(SIHD)。SIHD的治疗选择包括药物治疗、生活方式改变和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)或冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的血运重建。建议所有SIHD患者采用指南指导的药物治疗。除了无保护的左冠状动脉主干严重狭窄外,常规血运重建术在SIHD治疗中的作用尚不清楚。20世纪70年代和80年代的早期CABG试验显示CABG与药物治疗相比具有预后益处,但这些结果在现代医学治疗背景下的适用性有限,包括他汀类药物和阿司匹林的广泛使用以及强化生活方式干预。检验PCI加药物治疗与单独药物治疗的当代策略试验尚未证明PCI加药物治疗对预后有好处。根据试验数据,与单纯药物治疗相比,增加血运重建术提供了一致的症状和生活质量益处,尽管这种益处在PCI治疗中可能有时间限制。因此,在SIHD的治疗中,在指导医学治疗中加入血运重建术是一种平衡状态。因此,在确定SIHD患者的最佳管理策略时,共同决策是关键,应该包括基于高质量证据、成本和患者偏好的预期风险和收益的讨论。本综述包含6个图,8个表,55篇参考文献。关键词:心绞痛,抗心绞痛治疗,冠状动脉疾病,冠状动脉搭桥术,有指导的药物治疗,缺血,最佳药物治疗,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗,血运重建术
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic Imaging Techniques Vaccines and Vaccination Allergic Rhinitis, Conjunctivitis, and Sinusitis Lung Cancer - Part I Management of Poisoning and Drug Overdose
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1