Digitalization of Intimacy: Search for Optics for Digital Parenting

IF 0.4 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Laboratorium-Russian Review of Social Research Pub Date : 2020-12-26 DOI:10.25285/2078-1938-2020-12-3-178-195
E. Laktyukhina
{"title":"Digitalization of Intimacy: Search for Optics for Digital Parenting","authors":"E. Laktyukhina","doi":"10.25285/2078-1938-2020-12-3-178-195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This review article provides a theoretical analysis of the development of digital parenting research. Scholarship in digital parenting may be divided into two corpora of texts: those dealing with the problem of child safety in the digital space and with the problem of ensuring child safety with digital surveillance in everyday life. Analyzing modern concepts of digital parenthood, I mostly focus on the second problem. The essay analyzes the issues of theoretical sources and continuity in the conceptualization of the phenomenon of digital parenting. Proceeding from the thesis that the new sociology of childhood, which is the main engine for the development of parenting research, is methodologically connected with the sociology of everyday life, I address the main concepts of the sociology of everyday life—the structuralist constructivism of Pierre Bourdieu and the frame analysis of Erving Goffman. The purpose of the review essay is to analyze Bourdieu’s and Goffman’s basic sociology concepts as methodological resources for the conceptualization of digital parenting. Turning to Bourdieusian optics, I use the following concepts: social agents, social relations, resources, social practices, and physical space. Establishing links among them allows to observe most of the problems in the field of digital parenting that have appeared in recent years. In particular, one of the most common interpretations becomes clear: digital monitoring of children by parents is defined as a manifestation of a relationship of domination, an asymmetric distribution of power resources between groups of agents—children and parents. In the theoretical framework proposed by Goffman, technological devices that parents use in relation to their children are considered as things that frame these interactions. Conceptualization in the logic of frame analysis is based on the understanding that observation is the process of constituting the daily practices of children and parents.\nText in Russian\nDOI: 10.25285/2078-1938-2020-12-3-178-195","PeriodicalId":42805,"journal":{"name":"Laboratorium-Russian Review of Social Research","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratorium-Russian Review of Social Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25285/2078-1938-2020-12-3-178-195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This review article provides a theoretical analysis of the development of digital parenting research. Scholarship in digital parenting may be divided into two corpora of texts: those dealing with the problem of child safety in the digital space and with the problem of ensuring child safety with digital surveillance in everyday life. Analyzing modern concepts of digital parenthood, I mostly focus on the second problem. The essay analyzes the issues of theoretical sources and continuity in the conceptualization of the phenomenon of digital parenting. Proceeding from the thesis that the new sociology of childhood, which is the main engine for the development of parenting research, is methodologically connected with the sociology of everyday life, I address the main concepts of the sociology of everyday life—the structuralist constructivism of Pierre Bourdieu and the frame analysis of Erving Goffman. The purpose of the review essay is to analyze Bourdieu’s and Goffman’s basic sociology concepts as methodological resources for the conceptualization of digital parenting. Turning to Bourdieusian optics, I use the following concepts: social agents, social relations, resources, social practices, and physical space. Establishing links among them allows to observe most of the problems in the field of digital parenting that have appeared in recent years. In particular, one of the most common interpretations becomes clear: digital monitoring of children by parents is defined as a manifestation of a relationship of domination, an asymmetric distribution of power resources between groups of agents—children and parents. In the theoretical framework proposed by Goffman, technological devices that parents use in relation to their children are considered as things that frame these interactions. Conceptualization in the logic of frame analysis is based on the understanding that observation is the process of constituting the daily practices of children and parents. Text in Russian DOI: 10.25285/2078-1938-2020-12-3-178-195
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亲密关系的数字化:寻找数字化育儿的光学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Laboratorium-Russian Review of Social Research
Laboratorium-Russian Review of Social Research SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Polly Jones. Revolution Rekindled: The Writers and Readers of Late Soviet Biography. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019 John R. Wagner and Jerry K. Jacka, eds. Island Rivers: Fresh Water and Place in Oceania. Acton, Australia: ANU Press, 2018 Anna Sokolova. Novomu cheloveku — novaia smert'? Pohoronnaia kul'tura rannego SSSR. M.: NLO, 2021 Ekaterina Boltunova i Galina Egorova. Territoriia i istoriia: pozdnesovetskie proekty «Goroda-geroi» i «Zolotoe kol'tso». M.: Kuchkovo pole, 2022 Knight at the Crossroads: Russian Memory Studies from 2010s to 2020s
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1