Organ Shortage, Will People's Knowledge be a Path to the Solution?

C. Félix
{"title":"Organ Shortage, Will People's Knowledge be a Path to the Solution?","authors":"C. Félix","doi":"10.33805/2573.3877.137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organ shortage transforming death into life, which is what organ transplants symbolize, needs the end of somebody life, a scientific miracle of our times, but as well a social problem. Prejudices or ignorance inhibits to offering life to another human being. The consequence of this conflicting situation is that patients waiting for transplantation, “unfairly” die every day. States and Social Security should be involved in this problem. Programming efficient education will be important for change social conduct towards organ donation. As well, several studies emphasize the persistence of an insufficient university medical teams training in transplantation. Organ shortage and waiting lists patient’s mortality is a failure of social communication on organ donation and transplantation. Proposals to review social and university education in current organ shortage crisis might be an ethical duty for states health and education officials. Solidarity is a positive people’s feeling, nevertheless faced with death of a loved one; it does not seem to be an enough reason to justify authorization to donate. For many people, organ donation represents a perverse and unjustified action of mutilation. Considering the negative reactions that often can occur in the moment in which the alternative of deciding the donation of organs of a loved one is presented; we have proposed the inclusion in the social education plans the following concepts: • Organ shortage is a health emergency. • Throughout our lives, we might need organ or tissue transplantation. • Our body after death is a unique source of health to be shared. • Organ donation meant to” share life” more than “to gift life”. • Organ donation should be a social agreement. • People should know the social risks involved in establishing economic incentives for donation. This analysis is made to provide a basic knowledge of a vital medical crisis, and to suggest to decision makers of educational programs useful suggestions for this serious problem. In addition, and very particularly this work is directed to the Society, the main protagonist of this problem, requiring to receiving a correct and detailed information on the dilemma of the lack of organs, in quest that the donation decision will be an act of full awareness. A french philosopher, Jean Rostand has said \"To dream you have to know\".","PeriodicalId":79520,"journal":{"name":"Nursing and health care perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing and health care perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33805/2573.3877.137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Organ shortage transforming death into life, which is what organ transplants symbolize, needs the end of somebody life, a scientific miracle of our times, but as well a social problem. Prejudices or ignorance inhibits to offering life to another human being. The consequence of this conflicting situation is that patients waiting for transplantation, “unfairly” die every day. States and Social Security should be involved in this problem. Programming efficient education will be important for change social conduct towards organ donation. As well, several studies emphasize the persistence of an insufficient university medical teams training in transplantation. Organ shortage and waiting lists patient’s mortality is a failure of social communication on organ donation and transplantation. Proposals to review social and university education in current organ shortage crisis might be an ethical duty for states health and education officials. Solidarity is a positive people’s feeling, nevertheless faced with death of a loved one; it does not seem to be an enough reason to justify authorization to donate. For many people, organ donation represents a perverse and unjustified action of mutilation. Considering the negative reactions that often can occur in the moment in which the alternative of deciding the donation of organs of a loved one is presented; we have proposed the inclusion in the social education plans the following concepts: • Organ shortage is a health emergency. • Throughout our lives, we might need organ or tissue transplantation. • Our body after death is a unique source of health to be shared. • Organ donation meant to” share life” more than “to gift life”. • Organ donation should be a social agreement. • People should know the social risks involved in establishing economic incentives for donation. This analysis is made to provide a basic knowledge of a vital medical crisis, and to suggest to decision makers of educational programs useful suggestions for this serious problem. In addition, and very particularly this work is directed to the Society, the main protagonist of this problem, requiring to receiving a correct and detailed information on the dilemma of the lack of organs, in quest that the donation decision will be an act of full awareness. A french philosopher, Jean Rostand has said "To dream you have to know".
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
器官短缺,人们的知识会是解决问题的途径吗?
器官短缺将死亡转化为生命,这是器官移植的象征,需要结束一个人的生命,这是我们这个时代的科学奇迹,但也是一个社会问题。偏见或无知使人无法给予他人生命。这种矛盾局面的后果是,每天都有等待移植的患者“不公平地”死亡。国家和社会保障部门应该参与到这个问题中来。规划有效的教育对于改变对器官捐赠的社会行为非常重要。此外,一些研究强调,大学医疗团队在移植方面的培训一直不足。器官短缺和等待病人死亡是器官捐献和移植社会沟通的失败。在当前器官短缺危机中,对社会和大学教育进行审查的建议可能是各州卫生和教育官员的一项道德责任。团结是一种积极的人的感觉,尽管面对亲人的死亡;这似乎不足以成为授权捐赠的理由。对许多人来说,器官捐献是一种不正当的肢解行为。考虑到在决定捐赠亲人器官的选择出现时经常会出现的负面反应;我们建议在社会教育计划中纳入以下概念:•器官短缺是一种健康紧急情况。•在我们的一生中,我们可能需要器官或组织移植。•我们死后的身体是共享健康的独特来源。•器官捐赠意味着“分享生命”,而不是“赠送生命”。•器官捐赠应该是一项社会协议。•人们应该知道建立捐赠经济激励机制所涉及的社会风险。这种分析是为了提供一个重要的医疗危机的基本知识,并建议教育方案的决策者对这个严重的问题有用的建议。此外,这项工作特别针对这个问题的主角协会,要求获得关于器官缺乏困境的正确和详细的信息,以寻求捐赠决定将是一个充分认识的行为。法国哲学家Jean Rostand曾说过:“要梦想,你必须知道。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the Three Main Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) Equations in a Black African Population: A Cross-Sectional Study among Type 2 Diabetes Patients in Ghana Combating Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Nurses by Improving Sleep The Changed Role of Face Mask A Few Words about Sperm Donation Evidence-Based Practices in Mental Health and Psychiatric Nursing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1