THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TYPES OF ADMISSION SELECTION AND ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT IN THE FIRST-YEAR STUDENTS DURING THE TRANSITION TO DISTANCE LEARNING DUE TO COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Nikla Sekar Salsabila, Kurnia Wahyudi, Y. Pratiwi, E. Ariyanto, A. Achadiyani
{"title":"THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TYPES OF ADMISSION SELECTION AND ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT IN THE FIRST-YEAR STUDENTS DURING THE TRANSITION TO DISTANCE LEARNING DUE TO COVID-19 PANDEMIC","authors":"Nikla Sekar Salsabila, Kurnia Wahyudi, Y. Pratiwi, E. Ariyanto, A. Achadiyani","doi":"10.22146/jpki.64464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In 2019, there were three admission pathways in the Faculty of Medicine Universitas Padjadjaran (FMUP), which were SNMPTN (Seleksi Nasional Masuk Perguruan Tinggi Negeri), SBMPTN (Seleksi Bersama Masuk Perguruan Tinggi Negeri), and Seleksi Mandiri Universitas Padjadjaran (SMUP). SNMPTN was based on previous academic achievements in senior high school. SBMPTN was held through a highly competitive national examination, while SMUP was conducted through the test held by Universitas Padjadjaran. In their first year, batch 2019 students had to adapt to college life, and also to the transition into distance learning due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to know whether types of student admission selection contribute to academic achievements of the first-year students in the Hemato-immunology system (HIS), where the learning process was held during the transition into distance learning.Methods: This study compared the academic achievement of first-year students (batch 2019) on the second semester’s second half, using their HIS Multidisciplinary Examination (MDE) scores, for three selection methods. The data were 256 MDE scores of those students. Statistical analysis was performed using One Way ANOVA test, followed by Post-hoc Tukey test.Results: There was a statistically significant difference of HIS MDE scores for each selection method. The highest mean was by SNMPTN group (68.29+10.44), followed by SBMPTN group (64.90+11.29) and SMUP group (63.25+9.95).Conclusion: Students of SNMPTN group, who were selected based on previous academic achievements in senior high school, had higher HIS MDE scores than the other groups. ","PeriodicalId":17805,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education","volume":"138 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.64464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: In 2019, there were three admission pathways in the Faculty of Medicine Universitas Padjadjaran (FMUP), which were SNMPTN (Seleksi Nasional Masuk Perguruan Tinggi Negeri), SBMPTN (Seleksi Bersama Masuk Perguruan Tinggi Negeri), and Seleksi Mandiri Universitas Padjadjaran (SMUP). SNMPTN was based on previous academic achievements in senior high school. SBMPTN was held through a highly competitive national examination, while SMUP was conducted through the test held by Universitas Padjadjaran. In their first year, batch 2019 students had to adapt to college life, and also to the transition into distance learning due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to know whether types of student admission selection contribute to academic achievements of the first-year students in the Hemato-immunology system (HIS), where the learning process was held during the transition into distance learning.Methods: This study compared the academic achievement of first-year students (batch 2019) on the second semester’s second half, using their HIS Multidisciplinary Examination (MDE) scores, for three selection methods. The data were 256 MDE scores of those students. Statistical analysis was performed using One Way ANOVA test, followed by Post-hoc Tukey test.Results: There was a statistically significant difference of HIS MDE scores for each selection method. The highest mean was by SNMPTN group (68.29+10.44), followed by SBMPTN group (64.90+11.29) and SMUP group (63.25+9.95).Conclusion: Students of SNMPTN group, who were selected based on previous academic achievements in senior high school, had higher HIS MDE scores than the other groups. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎大流行导致的一年级学生远程学习转学过程中录取类型与学业成绩的关系
背景:2019年,Padjadjaran大学医学院(FMUP)有三个入学途径,分别是SNMPTN (Seleksi Nasional Masuk Perguruan Tinggi Negeri)、SBMPTN (Seleksi Bersama Masuk Perguruan Tinggi Negeri)和Seleksi Mandiri Universitas Padjadjaran (SMUP)。SNMPTN是基于以前的高中学业成绩。SBMPTN是通过竞争激烈的国家考试进行的,而SMUP是通过Padjadjaran大学举行的考试进行的。在第一年,2019届学生必须适应大学生活,也要适应因新冠肺炎大流行而过渡到远程学习。本研究旨在了解学生入学选择类型是否有助于血液免疫学系统(HIS)一年级学生的学业成绩,在向远程学习过渡的过程中,学习过程是进行的。方法:本研究采用三种选择方法,比较2019届一年级学生在第二学期下半年的学业成绩,采用HIS多学科考试(MDE)成绩。数据为这些学生的256个MDE分数。统计学分析采用单因素方差分析(One - Way ANOVA),再进行Post-hoc Tukey检验。结果:各选择方法的HIS MDE评分差异均有统计学意义。平均评分最高的是SNMPTN组(68.29+10.44),其次是SBMPTN组(64.90+11.29)和SMUP组(63.25+9.95)。结论:基于高中学业成绩选拔的SNMPTN组学生HIS MDE得分高于其他组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Inquiry Learning Methods to Increase Student Motivation and Learning Outcomes The Noteworthiness of Constructive Feedback and Student-Reflection to Approach Competence-Based Curriculum: An Explanatory Study of Medical Schools in Indonesia The Relationship Between Anatomy Identification Test Scores and The Suitability in V/A/R/K Modality Usage Between Study Habit and Learning Style COMPARISON OF HISTOLOGY PRACTICUM EXAM RESULTS BASED ON THE LEARNING STYLE OF MEDICAL STUDENTS Description of The Professional Identity of First-Level Clinical Medical Students and The Various Factors That Facilitate Its Formation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1