Correlation of neutrophil to lymphocyte with acute exacerbation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at tertiary care hospital in North West Rajasthan

Ritumbhara, Gunjan M. Soni, Ravi Gaur, J. Khatri, K. Soni
{"title":"Correlation of neutrophil to lymphocyte with acute exacerbation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at tertiary care hospital in North West Rajasthan","authors":"Ritumbhara, Gunjan M. Soni, Ravi Gaur, J. Khatri, K. Soni","doi":"10.18231/j.ijirm.2022.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD), is one of the most common disease in patients with infections, having frequent hospitalization. The aim of this study is to evaluate the potential for NLR to be used as a biomarker of COPD exacerbation. The hospital based case control Study is was conduct on hospitalized 100 patient with primary and final diagnosis of AECOPD and 100 patient of stable period of COPD. Socio-demographic variable in both groups were comparable. BMI was significantly lower in AECOPD patients. The mean PACK/YR in AECOPD group was 29.52±3.70 and in Stable COPD was 23.50±2.05. FEV1was significantly lower in AECOPD patients. Mean admission per year was significantly higher in AECOPD patients. Mean neutrophil count was significantly higher in AECOPD patients (11.49±2.32) as compare to stable COPD patients (6.47±2.01). Mean lymphyocyte count was significantly higher in AECOPD patients (2.07±0.05) as compare to stable COPD patients (1.71±0.07). Mean NLR was significantly higher in AECOPD patients (5.54±2.12) as compare to stable COPD patients (3.77±0.22). The difference in both groups was found statically significant. 5.00% hospital mortality in AECOPD patients. Mean neutrophil count was significantly higher in death as compare to survived patients. Mean NLR was significantly higher in death as compare to survived patients. NLR is readily available (Available at PHC) and simple parameter, could also be used as a cost-effective marker of inflammation in AECOPD. We have concluded that the neutrophil lymphocyte ratio on the day of presenting the illness was significantly higher in AECOPD as compare to stable COPD. Those patients who had a high NLR during admission were associated with poor survival.","PeriodicalId":14503,"journal":{"name":"IP Indian Journal of Immunology and Respiratory Medicine","volume":"195 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IP Indian Journal of Immunology and Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijirm.2022.027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD), is one of the most common disease in patients with infections, having frequent hospitalization. The aim of this study is to evaluate the potential for NLR to be used as a biomarker of COPD exacerbation. The hospital based case control Study is was conduct on hospitalized 100 patient with primary and final diagnosis of AECOPD and 100 patient of stable period of COPD. Socio-demographic variable in both groups were comparable. BMI was significantly lower in AECOPD patients. The mean PACK/YR in AECOPD group was 29.52±3.70 and in Stable COPD was 23.50±2.05. FEV1was significantly lower in AECOPD patients. Mean admission per year was significantly higher in AECOPD patients. Mean neutrophil count was significantly higher in AECOPD patients (11.49±2.32) as compare to stable COPD patients (6.47±2.01). Mean lymphyocyte count was significantly higher in AECOPD patients (2.07±0.05) as compare to stable COPD patients (1.71±0.07). Mean NLR was significantly higher in AECOPD patients (5.54±2.12) as compare to stable COPD patients (3.77±0.22). The difference in both groups was found statically significant. 5.00% hospital mortality in AECOPD patients. Mean neutrophil count was significantly higher in death as compare to survived patients. Mean NLR was significantly higher in death as compare to survived patients. NLR is readily available (Available at PHC) and simple parameter, could also be used as a cost-effective marker of inflammation in AECOPD. We have concluded that the neutrophil lymphocyte ratio on the day of presenting the illness was significantly higher in AECOPD as compare to stable COPD. Those patients who had a high NLR during admission were associated with poor survival.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中性粒细胞和淋巴细胞与拉贾斯坦邦西北部三级医院慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重的相关性
慢性阻塞性肺病急性加重(AECOPD)是感染患者中最常见的疾病之一,经常住院治疗。本研究的目的是评估NLR作为COPD恶化的生物标志物的潜力。以医院为基础的病例对照研究对100例初、终诊断为AECOPD的住院患者和100例稳定期COPD患者进行了研究。两组的社会人口统计学变量具有可比性。AECOPD患者的BMI显著降低。AECOPD组平均PACK/YR为29.52±3.70,稳定期组平均PACK/YR为23.50±2.05。AECOPD患者fev1显著降低。AECOPD患者的年平均住院率明显高于AECOPD患者。AECOPD患者的平均中性粒细胞计数(11.49±2.32)明显高于稳定期COPD患者(6.47±2.01)。AECOPD患者的平均淋巴细胞计数(2.07±0.05)明显高于稳定期COPD患者(1.71±0.07)。AECOPD患者的平均NLR(5.54±2.12)明显高于稳定期COPD患者(3.77±0.22)。两组的差异具有统计学意义。AECOPD患者住院死亡率5.00%。死亡患者的平均中性粒细胞计数明显高于存活患者。平均NLR死亡率明显高于存活患者。NLR很容易获得(PHC可用),参数简单,也可以作为AECOPD炎症的经济有效的标志物。我们的结论是,与稳定型COPD相比,AECOPD患者在发病当天的中性粒细胞淋巴细胞比率显著高于稳定型COPD。入院时NLR高的患者生存率较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence in tuberculosis diagnosis: Revolutionizing detection and treatment A closer look -Asymptomatic cysticercosis unveiled during COPD exacerbation: A case report Think beyond TB lymphadenitis - Kikuchi fujimoto lymphadenitis Psychological manifestations in patients with tuberculosis: prevalence and contributing factors Evaluation of impact of adherence to inhaled therapy and critical mistakes in inhalation technique on clinical outcomes in patients with obstructive airway diseases in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1