Comparison of Average Absorbed Dose Distributions of Organs in SPECT-CT Imaging Using Monte Carlo Simulation

Q3 Health Professions Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies Pub Date : 2022-12-31 DOI:10.18502/fbt.v10i1.11513
Shamim Bagheri, H. Rajabi, A. Bitarafan-rajabi
{"title":"Comparison of Average Absorbed Dose Distributions of Organs in SPECT-CT Imaging Using Monte Carlo Simulation","authors":"Shamim Bagheri, H. Rajabi, A. Bitarafan-rajabi","doi":"10.18502/fbt.v10i1.11513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The use of ionizing radiation in medical research, treatment, and diagnosis is inevitable and expanding day by day. Meanwhile, in two modes of Computed Tomography (CT) and Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) imaging, the dose received by the organs is featured with limitations and problems, which are often referred to as the CT Dose Index volume (CTDIvol.) and the Dose Length Product (DLP). This study aimed to estimate the average dose of organs and compare them in each of these two modalities. \nMaterials and Methods: Using the GATE code to simulate the SPECT-CT system and the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) voxelized phantom as the patient was investigated. The mean dose distribution in three groups of children, adults, and obese people with different body thicknesses was estimated. The dose received by each of the two systems was evaluated separately and results were discussed and analyzed comparatively. \nResults: In the kidney, bladder, intestine, colon, liver, and gallbladder, the dose received in CT is at least 10% more than nuclear medicine. For example, the ratio of the dose received in CT to the dose received in nuclear medicine in the lung was about 1.08 and in the esophagus was about 1.24. Subsequently, the ratio increased to 0.25 in the bladder and 0.19 in the colon and intestine. Moreover, the major organs that received the maximum dose, result in CT at least 10% more than nuclear medicine. \nConclusion: The dose received in organs such as the esophagus, breast, and lung during CT imaging protocol and also maximum dose were at least ten percent more than nuclear medicine.","PeriodicalId":34203,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies","volume":"176 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/fbt.v10i1.11513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The use of ionizing radiation in medical research, treatment, and diagnosis is inevitable and expanding day by day. Meanwhile, in two modes of Computed Tomography (CT) and Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) imaging, the dose received by the organs is featured with limitations and problems, which are often referred to as the CT Dose Index volume (CTDIvol.) and the Dose Length Product (DLP). This study aimed to estimate the average dose of organs and compare them in each of these two modalities. Materials and Methods: Using the GATE code to simulate the SPECT-CT system and the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) voxelized phantom as the patient was investigated. The mean dose distribution in three groups of children, adults, and obese people with different body thicknesses was estimated. The dose received by each of the two systems was evaluated separately and results were discussed and analyzed comparatively. Results: In the kidney, bladder, intestine, colon, liver, and gallbladder, the dose received in CT is at least 10% more than nuclear medicine. For example, the ratio of the dose received in CT to the dose received in nuclear medicine in the lung was about 1.08 and in the esophagus was about 1.24. Subsequently, the ratio increased to 0.25 in the bladder and 0.19 in the colon and intestine. Moreover, the major organs that received the maximum dose, result in CT at least 10% more than nuclear medicine. Conclusion: The dose received in organs such as the esophagus, breast, and lung during CT imaging protocol and also maximum dose were at least ten percent more than nuclear medicine.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
蒙特卡罗模拟SPECT-CT成像中器官平均吸收剂量分布的比较
目的:电离辐射在医学研究、治疗和诊断中的应用是不可避免的,并且日益扩大。同时,在计算机断层扫描(CT)和单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)两种成像方式中,器官所接受的剂量存在局限性和问题,通常称为CT剂量指数体积(CTDIvol)和剂量长度积(DLP)。本研究旨在估计器官的平均剂量,并在这两种模式下进行比较。材料和方法:在对患者进行调查时,使用GATE代码模拟SPECT-CT系统和国际放射防护委员会(ICRP)体素化幻象。估计了三组不同体重的儿童、成人和肥胖者的平均剂量分布。分别对两种体系所接受的剂量进行了评价,并对结果进行了比较讨论和分析。结果:在肾、膀胱、肠、结肠、肝、胆囊,CT上接受的剂量比核医学至少高出10%。例如,CT所接受的剂量与核医学所接受的剂量在肺部的比值约为1.08,在食道的比值约为1.24。随后,该比例在膀胱中增加到0.25,在结肠和肠道中增加到0.19。此外,接受最大剂量的主要器官的CT结果至少比核医学多10%。结论:CT成像过程中食道、乳腺、肺等脏器所受剂量及最大剂量均比核医学高10%以上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies
Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
AI in Nuclear Medical Applications: Challenges and Opportunities Evaluation of Eye-Blinking Dynamics in Human Emotion Recognition Using Weighted Visibility Graph Assessment of SPECT Image Reconstruction in Liver Scanning Using 99mTc/ EDDA/ HYNIC-TOCAssessment of SPECT Image Reconstruction in Liver Scanning Using 99mTc/ EDDA/ HYNIC-TOC Analysis of the Prevalence of Lumbar Annular Tears in Adult Patients Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data Grading the Dominant Pathological Indices in Liver Diseases from Pathological Images Using Radiomics Methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1