Early outcomes using a 'kinematic retaining' total knee replacement - A multicentre prospective study at two years follow-up.

A. Harvey, I. Barlow, C. Carulli, M. Innocenti, James Oliver Smith
{"title":"Early outcomes using a 'kinematic retaining' total knee replacement - A multicentre prospective study at two years follow-up.","authors":"A. Harvey, I. Barlow, C. Carulli, M. Innocenti, James Oliver Smith","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4135377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nAlthough predictable implant longevity in total knee replacement (TKR) is now established, work continues to satisfy the demands of patients who seek full restoration of the painless function of the native knee following TKR. This prospective study examines the early clinical outcomes of 156 patients implanted with a novel 'kinematic-retaining' (KR) implant.\n\n\nMETHODS\n156 Physica KR TKRs were implanted for primary osteoarthritis at three European centres. Patients were reviewed up to two years using radiographic, clinical and functional evaluations.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOf the 137 patients retained at two years' follow up, none had been revised. Within 6 post-operative months, 51.7% and 79.9% had excellent clinical and functional KSS values respectively, increasing to 81.8% and 88.3% beyond two years. Mean KSS improvement was 34.8 (from 48.6 to 83.4). All KOOS sub-scores improved significantly with total KOOS improving from a mean of 35.5 (SD ±13.0) to 86.5 (±13.7) at two years post-operatively. Pain and sports KOOS sub-scores improved rapidly during the early post-operative periods, with sustained improvements beyond this. Mean OKS improved by 44.1 (±5.1) at two years. VAS satisfaction scores improved significantly at all time points beyond six weeks. Mean FJS-12 was 75.7 at two years, with no significant effects of age or gender. No progressive adverse radiographic features were noted.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nEarly clinical and radiographic outcomes of this kinematic-retaining knee prosthesis are promising, with improvements in clinical parameters similar to, or exceeding those published in other contemporary TKR designs.\n\n\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\nII, Multicentre Prospective cohort study.","PeriodicalId":22205,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of knee surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of knee surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4135377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

BACKGROUND Although predictable implant longevity in total knee replacement (TKR) is now established, work continues to satisfy the demands of patients who seek full restoration of the painless function of the native knee following TKR. This prospective study examines the early clinical outcomes of 156 patients implanted with a novel 'kinematic-retaining' (KR) implant. METHODS 156 Physica KR TKRs were implanted for primary osteoarthritis at three European centres. Patients were reviewed up to two years using radiographic, clinical and functional evaluations. RESULTS Of the 137 patients retained at two years' follow up, none had been revised. Within 6 post-operative months, 51.7% and 79.9% had excellent clinical and functional KSS values respectively, increasing to 81.8% and 88.3% beyond two years. Mean KSS improvement was 34.8 (from 48.6 to 83.4). All KOOS sub-scores improved significantly with total KOOS improving from a mean of 35.5 (SD ±13.0) to 86.5 (±13.7) at two years post-operatively. Pain and sports KOOS sub-scores improved rapidly during the early post-operative periods, with sustained improvements beyond this. Mean OKS improved by 44.1 (±5.1) at two years. VAS satisfaction scores improved significantly at all time points beyond six weeks. Mean FJS-12 was 75.7 at two years, with no significant effects of age or gender. No progressive adverse radiographic features were noted. CONCLUSIONS Early clinical and radiographic outcomes of this kinematic-retaining knee prosthesis are promising, with improvements in clinical parameters similar to, or exceeding those published in other contemporary TKR designs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II, Multicentre Prospective cohort study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用“运动学保留”全膝关节置换术的早期结果-一项为期两年随访的多中心前瞻性研究。
背景:虽然全膝关节置换术(TKR)中可预测的植入物寿命现已确立,但仍需继续满足患者在全膝关节置换术后寻求完全恢复膝关节无痛功能的需求。这项前瞻性研究检查了156例植入新型“运动学保留”(KR)植入物的患者的早期临床结果。方法在欧洲3个中心植入physia KR tkr治疗原发性骨关节炎。对患者进行为期两年的影像学、临床和功能评估。结果随访2年的137例患者中,没有一例患者进行过修改。术后6个月内,51.7%和79.9%的患者临床和功能KSS评分为优,2年后分别上升至81.8%和88.3%。平均KSS改善34.8(从48.6到83.4)。所有KOOS分项评分均显著改善,术后2年总KOOS从平均35.5 (SD±13.0)改善至86.5(±13.7)。疼痛和运动KOOS分值在术后早期迅速改善,此后持续改善。两年后的平均OKS提高了44.1(±5.1)。VAS满意度评分在6周后的所有时间点均有显著提高。两年时FJS-12平均为75.7分,年龄和性别无显著影响。未发现进行性不良影像学特征。结论:该运动学保留膝关节假体的早期临床和影像学结果是有希望的,其临床参数的改善与其他当代TKR设计相似或超过。证据水平:多中心前瞻性队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Kinematic comparison between the knee after bicruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty and the native knee: A cadaveric study. Is cement mantle thickness a primary cause of aseptic tibial loosening following primary total knee arthroplasty? A new look at quadriceps tendon - Is it really composed of three layers? An analysis of the incidence, risk factors, and timing of development of cyclops lesions after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Immunohistochemical analysis of the quadriceps femoris muscle before and after total knee arthroplasty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1