On the Selection of Loss Severity Distributions to Model Operational Risk

Daniel P. Hadley, H. Joe, N. Nolde
{"title":"On the Selection of Loss Severity Distributions to Model Operational Risk","authors":"Daniel P. Hadley, H. Joe, N. Nolde","doi":"10.21314/JOP.2019.229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurate modeling of operational risk is important for a bank and the finance industry as a whole to prepare for potentially catastrophic losses. One approach to modeling operational is the loss distribution approach, which requires a bank to group operational losses into risk categories and select a loss frequency and severity distribution for each category. This approach estimates the annual operational loss distribution, and a bank must set aside capital, called regulatory capital, equal to the 0.999 quantile of this estimated distribution. In practice, this approach may produce unstable regulatory capital calculations from year-to-year as selected loss severity distribution families change. This paper presents truncation probability estimates for loss severity data and a consistent quantile scoring function on annual loss data as useful severity distribution selection criteria that may lead to more stable regulatory capital. Additionally, the Sinh-arcSinh distribution is another flexible candidate family for modeling loss severities that can be easily estimated using the maximum likelihood approach. Finally, we recommend that loss frequencies below the minimum reporting threshold be collected so that loss severity data can be treated as censored data.","PeriodicalId":11689,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Commercial Banks (Topic)","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Commercial Banks (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21314/JOP.2019.229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate modeling of operational risk is important for a bank and the finance industry as a whole to prepare for potentially catastrophic losses. One approach to modeling operational is the loss distribution approach, which requires a bank to group operational losses into risk categories and select a loss frequency and severity distribution for each category. This approach estimates the annual operational loss distribution, and a bank must set aside capital, called regulatory capital, equal to the 0.999 quantile of this estimated distribution. In practice, this approach may produce unstable regulatory capital calculations from year-to-year as selected loss severity distribution families change. This paper presents truncation probability estimates for loss severity data and a consistent quantile scoring function on annual loss data as useful severity distribution selection criteria that may lead to more stable regulatory capital. Additionally, the Sinh-arcSinh distribution is another flexible candidate family for modeling loss severities that can be easily estimated using the maximum likelihood approach. Finally, we recommend that loss frequencies below the minimum reporting threshold be collected so that loss severity data can be treated as censored data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
操作风险损失严重性分布模型的选择
准确的操作风险建模对于银行和整个金融业为潜在的灾难性损失做好准备是非常重要的。对操作进行建模的一种方法是损失分布方法,该方法要求银行将操作损失分组为风险类别,并为每个类别选择损失频率和严重程度分布。这种方法估计年度经营损失分布,银行必须拨出相当于该估计分布的0.999分位数的资本,称为监管资本。实际上,随着所选损失严重程度分布家族的变化,这种方法可能会产生逐年不稳定的监管资本计算。本文提出了损失严重程度数据的截断概率估计和年度损失数据的一致分位数评分函数,作为有用的严重程度分布选择标准,可能导致更稳定的监管资本。此外,Sinh-arcSinh分布是另一个灵活的候选家族,用于建模损失严重程度,可以使用最大似然方法轻松估计。最后,我们建议收集低于最低报告阈值的损失频率,以便损失严重程度数据可以被视为审查数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Banks’ Interest Rate Setting and Transitions between Liquidity Surplus and Deficit ECB Monetary Policy and Bank Default Risk Bank Regulation and Market Discipline in the Presence of Risk-Shifting Incentives 'Negative-For-Long' Interest Rates and Customer Deposit Rate Anticipatory effects around proposed regulation: Evidence from Basel III
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1