{"title":"ANALISIS HUKUM TERHADAP PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA HUTANG PIUTANG MELALUI AKTA PERDAMAIAN (Studi Putusan Nomor: 1/Pdt.G.S/2017/PN. Blg)","authors":"M. Sh.","doi":"10.30743/jhk.v18i3.1206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Analysis of settlement of debt receivables disputes between PT. Bank Perkreditan Rakyat NBP 5 and Lisbon Manurung, defendant I, and Tetty Herawati, the defendant II. The settlement is carried out based on Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2015 concerning Procedures for Completion of Simple Lawsuits because the value of the material claim does not exceed 200,000,000.00 Rupiahs (two hundred million rupiahs). The dispute ended with the ruling of the peace deed because of the good intentions of the parties who ended the dispute by means of peace. In the study of the decision, the author applied legal research in a normative juridical manner. The result of this study indicates that the legal analysis of debt settlement through agreements / deeds of peace has legal consequences for the parties, namely closed appeal and cassation legal efforts, which have permanent legal force, and executive power. Keywords: Debt and Receivables, Peace, Settlement.","PeriodicalId":32023,"journal":{"name":"Humani Jurnal Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humani Jurnal Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30743/jhk.v18i3.1206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Analysis of settlement of debt receivables disputes between PT. Bank Perkreditan Rakyat NBP 5 and Lisbon Manurung, defendant I, and Tetty Herawati, the defendant II. The settlement is carried out based on Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2015 concerning Procedures for Completion of Simple Lawsuits because the value of the material claim does not exceed 200,000,000.00 Rupiahs (two hundred million rupiahs). The dispute ended with the ruling of the peace deed because of the good intentions of the parties who ended the dispute by means of peace. In the study of the decision, the author applied legal research in a normative juridical manner. The result of this study indicates that the legal analysis of debt settlement through agreements / deeds of peace has legal consequences for the parties, namely closed appeal and cassation legal efforts, which have permanent legal force, and executive power. Keywords: Debt and Receivables, Peace, Settlement.