A Core Outcome Set for Exercise and Physical Activity Interventions for Musculoskeletal Disorders

Thompson Alexander, Mallett Ross, Potia Tanzila, Harrop Deb, Kirk Matthew, McLean Sionnadh
{"title":"A Core Outcome Set for Exercise and Physical Activity Interventions for Musculoskeletal Disorders","authors":"Thompson Alexander, Mallett Ross, Potia Tanzila, Harrop Deb, Kirk Matthew, McLean Sionnadh","doi":"10.23937/2572-3243.1510119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSKD) create a significant burden on individuals and society. Physical activity is an effective way of self-managing MSKD. Global health policy routinely recommends the instigation of management approaches to support people with MSKD to engage in physical activity. However, there is considerable heterogeneity in outcome measurement and establishing whether interventions are effective or not. A way of addressing this is to develop a core outcome set (COS). This study aims to identify a COS for exercise and physical activity interventions for people with MSKD. Methods: Guidance from the COMET initiative was followed. The study had two phases. 1) A systematic search of effectiveness studies investigating interventions that aim to increase physical activity levels in people with MSKD was conducted. All outcome concepts evaluated were extracted from the included studies. 2) Patients with MSKD and expert stakeholders then participated in an online and workshop-based consensus process. In accordance with other COS development studies, 70% agreement was required for a concept to be included in the final COS. Results: Phase 1: 25 studies were identified from the systematic searches and 50 conceptually different outcomes were extracted. Phase 2: 14 group members were recruited to the consensus phase. Function, Patient satisfaction, Physical activity, Quality of Life, Pain, Cost-effectiveness, Self-efficacy, Knowledge to plan future exercise, Utilisation of health services were the concepts that reached the 70% threshold for inclusion in the final COS. Conclusions: This study provides a COS that could provide an outcome measurement strategy in interventions that aim to increase exercise and physical activity in people with MSKD.","PeriodicalId":16374,"journal":{"name":"Journal of musculoskeletal disorders and treatment","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of musculoskeletal disorders and treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2572-3243.1510119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSKD) create a significant burden on individuals and society. Physical activity is an effective way of self-managing MSKD. Global health policy routinely recommends the instigation of management approaches to support people with MSKD to engage in physical activity. However, there is considerable heterogeneity in outcome measurement and establishing whether interventions are effective or not. A way of addressing this is to develop a core outcome set (COS). This study aims to identify a COS for exercise and physical activity interventions for people with MSKD. Methods: Guidance from the COMET initiative was followed. The study had two phases. 1) A systematic search of effectiveness studies investigating interventions that aim to increase physical activity levels in people with MSKD was conducted. All outcome concepts evaluated were extracted from the included studies. 2) Patients with MSKD and expert stakeholders then participated in an online and workshop-based consensus process. In accordance with other COS development studies, 70% agreement was required for a concept to be included in the final COS. Results: Phase 1: 25 studies were identified from the systematic searches and 50 conceptually different outcomes were extracted. Phase 2: 14 group members were recruited to the consensus phase. Function, Patient satisfaction, Physical activity, Quality of Life, Pain, Cost-effectiveness, Self-efficacy, Knowledge to plan future exercise, Utilisation of health services were the concepts that reached the 70% threshold for inclusion in the final COS. Conclusions: This study provides a COS that could provide an outcome measurement strategy in interventions that aim to increase exercise and physical activity in people with MSKD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肌肉骨骼疾病的运动和身体活动干预的核心结果集
背景:肌肉骨骼疾病(MSKD)给个人和社会造成了巨大的负担。体育活动是自我管理MSKD的有效途径。全球卫生政策通常建议采取管理办法,支持MSKD患者从事身体活动。然而,在结果测量和确定干预措施是否有效方面存在相当大的异质性。解决这个问题的一个方法是开发一个核心结果集(COS)。本研究旨在确定MSKD患者运动和身体活动干预的COS。方法:遵循COMET倡议的指导。这项研究分为两个阶段。1)对旨在提高MSKD患者身体活动水平的干预措施的有效性研究进行了系统的搜索。评估的所有结局概念均来自纳入的研究。2) MSKD患者和专家利益相关者随后参与了在线和基于研讨会的共识过程。根据其他COS发展研究,一个概念必须得到70%的同意才能列入最后COS。结果:第一阶段:从系统搜索中确定了25项研究,并提取了50个概念上不同的结果。第二阶段:招募14名小组成员进入共识阶段。功能、患者满意度、身体活动、生活质量、疼痛、成本效益、自我效能、计划未来运动的知识、卫生服务的利用等概念达到了最终COS的70%门槛。结论:本研究提供了一个COS,可以为旨在增加MSKD患者的锻炼和身体活动的干预措施提供结果测量策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Estrogen on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Structure and Function: A Systematic Review The Effect of Estrogen on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Structure and Function: A Systematic Review Neglected Radiocarpal Dislocations: Descriptive Note on Five Cases in Black Africa An Intervention Program Based on Motor Coordination Principles Improves Knee Alignment in Pre-Professional Ballet Dancers Non-Invasive Biomechanical Intervention Leads to Low Rates of Total Knee Replacement and Reduced Utilization of Healthcare Resources among Older Adults with Chronic Knee Pain: A 5-Year Follow-Up Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1