Relationship Between the Nasopharyngeal Swab Sampling Method, Nasal Obstruction, and SARS-Cov-2 Positivity

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Haseki TIp Bulteni-Medical Bulletin of Haseki Pub Date : 2022-09-30 DOI:10.4274/haseki.galenos.2022.8492
D. Çakan, Zeliha Kubra Cakan, Semih Uşaklıoğlu, Y. Yılmaz, Omer Uysal, Hasan Ahmet Ozdogan
{"title":"Relationship Between the Nasopharyngeal Swab Sampling Method, Nasal Obstruction, and SARS-Cov-2 Positivity","authors":"D. Çakan, Zeliha Kubra Cakan, Semih Uşaklıoğlu, Y. Yılmaz, Omer Uysal, Hasan Ahmet Ozdogan","doi":"10.4274/haseki.galenos.2022.8492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: We think that the nasopharyngeal swab sample should be taken bilaterally to improve the sensitivity of the real-time-reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test since there may be pathologies that cause nasal obstruction, such as nasal septum deviation (NSD). In this context, we investigated the effect of the nasopharyngeal swab sampling method and the presence of nasal obstruction on the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Method(s): This prospective clinical study was conducted from March 2021 to January 2022. Forty-four hospitalized patients with NSD were included in the study group, and 44 hospitalized patients without NSD were included in the control group. The results of the RT-PCR test studied with a unilateral nasopharyngeal swab sample taken during hospitalization and the RT-PCR test studied with a bilateral nasopharyngeal swab sample taken on the 2nd day of hospitalization and the visual analog scale (VAS) scores showing the patients' pain during the first sampling were determined. Result(s): In the first test, 23 (52.3%) patients in the study group and 32 (72.7%) patients in the control group were evaluated as SARS-CoV-2 positive. The first test sensitivity was significantly higher in the control group (p=0.048). The VAS score was significantly higher in the study group (p=0.00008). In the second test, 35 (79.5%) patients in the study group and 37 (84.1%) patients in the control group were evaluated as SARS-CoV-2 positive. The sensitivity increases in the study group and in the population were statistically significant (p=0.007 and p=0.004, respectively). The consistency of the first and second test results increased in patients without NSD and in patients with low VAS scores [odds ratio (OR)=3.779;p=0.001, OR=2.572;p=0.005, respectively]. Conclusion(s): Nasopharyngeal swab sampling may be affected by nasal congestion and the sampling method. To avoid this, it may be more appropriate to take a nasopharyngeal swab sample through the bilateral nasal cavity. Copyright © 2022 by The Medical Bulletin of Istanbul Haseki Training and Research Hospital The Medical Bulletin of Haseki published by Galenos Yayinevi.","PeriodicalId":42416,"journal":{"name":"Haseki TIp Bulteni-Medical Bulletin of Haseki","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Haseki TIp Bulteni-Medical Bulletin of Haseki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/haseki.galenos.2022.8492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: We think that the nasopharyngeal swab sample should be taken bilaterally to improve the sensitivity of the real-time-reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test since there may be pathologies that cause nasal obstruction, such as nasal septum deviation (NSD). In this context, we investigated the effect of the nasopharyngeal swab sampling method and the presence of nasal obstruction on the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Method(s): This prospective clinical study was conducted from March 2021 to January 2022. Forty-four hospitalized patients with NSD were included in the study group, and 44 hospitalized patients without NSD were included in the control group. The results of the RT-PCR test studied with a unilateral nasopharyngeal swab sample taken during hospitalization and the RT-PCR test studied with a bilateral nasopharyngeal swab sample taken on the 2nd day of hospitalization and the visual analog scale (VAS) scores showing the patients' pain during the first sampling were determined. Result(s): In the first test, 23 (52.3%) patients in the study group and 32 (72.7%) patients in the control group were evaluated as SARS-CoV-2 positive. The first test sensitivity was significantly higher in the control group (p=0.048). The VAS score was significantly higher in the study group (p=0.00008). In the second test, 35 (79.5%) patients in the study group and 37 (84.1%) patients in the control group were evaluated as SARS-CoV-2 positive. The sensitivity increases in the study group and in the population were statistically significant (p=0.007 and p=0.004, respectively). The consistency of the first and second test results increased in patients without NSD and in patients with low VAS scores [odds ratio (OR)=3.779;p=0.001, OR=2.572;p=0.005, respectively]. Conclusion(s): Nasopharyngeal swab sampling may be affected by nasal congestion and the sampling method. To avoid this, it may be more appropriate to take a nasopharyngeal swab sample through the bilateral nasal cavity. Copyright © 2022 by The Medical Bulletin of Istanbul Haseki Training and Research Hospital The Medical Bulletin of Haseki published by Galenos Yayinevi.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鼻咽拭子取样方法、鼻塞与SARS-Cov-2阳性的关系
目的:我们认为实时逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测可能存在鼻中隔偏曲(鼻中隔偏曲)等病理因素,应采用双侧鼻咽拭子取样,以提高检测的灵敏度。在此背景下,我们研究了鼻咽拭子取样方法和鼻塞对检测严重急性呼吸综合征-冠状病毒-2 (SARS-CoV-2)的影响。方法:本前瞻性临床研究于2021年3月至2022年1月进行。44例住院NSD患者纳入研究组,44例未住院NSD患者纳入对照组。采用住院期间单侧鼻咽拭子样本进行RT-PCR检测,采用住院第2天双侧鼻咽拭子样本进行RT-PCR检测,测定第一次取样时患者疼痛的视觉模拟评分(VAS)。结果:在第一次检测中,研究组23例(52.3%)患者和对照组32例(72.7%)患者被评估为SARS-CoV-2阳性。对照组第一次检测的敏感性显著高于对照组(p=0.048)。研究组VAS评分显著高于对照组(p=0.00008)。在第二次检测中,研究组35例(79.5%)和对照组37例(84.1%)被评估为SARS-CoV-2阳性。研究组和人群的敏感性增加有统计学意义(分别为p=0.007和p=0.004)。无NSD患者和VAS评分较低患者的第一次和第二次检测结果的一致性增加[优势比(OR)=3.779;p=0.001, OR=2.572;p=0.005]。结论:鼻咽拭子取样可能受到鼻塞和取样方法的影响。为了避免这种情况,可能更合适的方法是通过双侧鼻腔采集鼻咽拭子样本。伊斯坦布尔Haseki培训和研究医院医学公报版权所有©2022。Galenos Yayinevi出版的Haseki医学公报。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Haseki TIp Bulteni-Medical Bulletin of Haseki
Haseki TIp Bulteni-Medical Bulletin of Haseki MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Medial Open Reduction via Anteromedial Approach in Developmental Hip Dysplasia: Long-term Clinical and Radiological Outcomes Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Physicians Spiritual Well-Being Scale The Diagnostic Rate and Clinical Implications of Neuron-Specific Enolase in Neuroendocrine Tumors and Small Cell Lung Cancer: Data from the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Turkey Comparison of Treatment Options for Enthesitis-Related Arthritis with the Juvenile Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Index Comprehensive Analysis of Prognostic Factors Affecting Postoperative Mortality in Adult Patients Undergoing Lower Extremity Amputation due to Diabetic Foot Ulcer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1