Percutaneous Transcatheter Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale in Patients With Paradoxical Embolism

F. Martín, P. Sánchez, E. Doherty, P. Colon-Hernandez, G. Delgado, I. Inglessis, N. Scott, J. Hung, M. E. King, F. Buonanno, Z. Demirjian, M. D. de Moor, I. Palacios
{"title":"Percutaneous Transcatheter Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale in Patients With Paradoxical Embolism","authors":"F. Martín, P. Sánchez, E. Doherty, P. Colon-Hernandez, G. Delgado, I. Inglessis, N. Scott, J. Hung, M. E. King, F. Buonanno, Z. Demirjian, M. D. de Moor, I. Palacios","doi":"10.1161/01.CIR.0000027819.19722.EE","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background—Percutaneous transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) is used as an alternative to surgery or long-term anticoagulation for the treatment of patients with paradoxical embolism and PFO. Methods and Results—We report the immediate and long-term clinical and echocardiographic outcome of 110 consecutive patients (58 males, mean age 47±14 years) who underwent transcatheter closure of PFO because of paradoxical embolism between 1995 and 2001. Procedural success, defined as successful deployment of the device and effective occlusion (no, or trivial, shunt after device placement), was achieved in all (100%) patients. There was no in-hospital mortality, 1 device migration requiring surgical intervention (0.9%), and 1 episode of cardiac tamponade (0.9%) requiring pericardiocentesis. A progressive increment in full occlusion was observed (44%, 51%, 66%, and 71% at 1 day, 6 months, and 1 and 2 years, respectively, after device placement). At a mean follow-up of 2.3 years, 2 patients experienced recurrent neurological events (1 fatal stroke and 1 transient ischemic attack), representing an annual risk of recurrence of 0.9%. In addition, 4 (3.6%) of the patients required reintervention for device malalignment or significant shunt. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a freedom from recurrent embolic events and reintervention of 96% and 90% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. Conclusions—Transcatheter closure of PFO is a safe and effective therapy for patients with paradoxical embolism and PFO. It is associated with a high success rate, low incidence of hospital complications, and low frequency of recurrent systemic embolic events.","PeriodicalId":10194,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":"199 1","pages":"1121-1126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"330","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000027819.19722.EE","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 330

Abstract

Background—Percutaneous transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) is used as an alternative to surgery or long-term anticoagulation for the treatment of patients with paradoxical embolism and PFO. Methods and Results—We report the immediate and long-term clinical and echocardiographic outcome of 110 consecutive patients (58 males, mean age 47±14 years) who underwent transcatheter closure of PFO because of paradoxical embolism between 1995 and 2001. Procedural success, defined as successful deployment of the device and effective occlusion (no, or trivial, shunt after device placement), was achieved in all (100%) patients. There was no in-hospital mortality, 1 device migration requiring surgical intervention (0.9%), and 1 episode of cardiac tamponade (0.9%) requiring pericardiocentesis. A progressive increment in full occlusion was observed (44%, 51%, 66%, and 71% at 1 day, 6 months, and 1 and 2 years, respectively, after device placement). At a mean follow-up of 2.3 years, 2 patients experienced recurrent neurological events (1 fatal stroke and 1 transient ischemic attack), representing an annual risk of recurrence of 0.9%. In addition, 4 (3.6%) of the patients required reintervention for device malalignment or significant shunt. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a freedom from recurrent embolic events and reintervention of 96% and 90% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. Conclusions—Transcatheter closure of PFO is a safe and effective therapy for patients with paradoxical embolism and PFO. It is associated with a high success rate, low incidence of hospital complications, and low frequency of recurrent systemic embolic events.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经皮经导管封堵异位栓塞患者卵圆孔未闭
背景:经皮经导管闭合卵圆孔未闭(PFO)被用作治疗悖论性栓塞和PFO患者的替代手术或长期抗凝治疗。方法和结果:我们报告了1995年至2001年间110例连续患者(男性58例,平均年龄47±14岁)的近期和长期临床和超声心动图结果,这些患者因矛盾栓塞而接受经导管关闭PFO。手术成功,定义为器械的成功部署和有效的闭塞(器械放置后无分流或轻微分流),在所有(100%)患者中实现。无院内死亡,1例器械移位需要手术干预(0.9%),1例心包填塞(0.9%)需要心包穿刺。在器械放置后1天、6个月、1年和2年,观察到完全咬合的进行性增加(分别为44%、51%、66%和71%)。在平均2.3年的随访中,2例患者出现复发性神经事件(1例致死性卒中和1例短暂性脑缺血发作),年复发风险为0.9%。此外,4例(3.6%)患者因器械不对准或明显分流而需要再次介入治疗。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,1年和5年的再干预率分别为96%和90%。结论:经导管封堵PFO是治疗矛盾栓塞合并PFO的一种安全有效的治疗方法。它具有高成功率、低医院并发症发生率和低复发性全身栓塞事件的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abstracts 4th Scientific Forum on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research in Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke Heat Shock Protein 72 Enhances Manganese Superoxide Dismutase Activity During Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury, Associated With Mitochondrial Protection and Apoptosis Reduction Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling After Surgical Therapy for Aortic Stenosis: Correlation to Renin-Angiotensin System Gene Expression Circulatory Assistance With a Permanent Implantable IABP: Initial Human Experience Keratinocyte Growth Factor Enhances Post-Pneumonectomy Lung Growth by Alveolar Proliferation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1