Entrepreneurship, Geography, and American Economic Growth: A Formulation of Entrepreneurship Policy

Z. Acs, C. Armington
{"title":"Entrepreneurship, Geography, and American Economic Growth: A Formulation of Entrepreneurship Policy","authors":"Z. Acs, C. Armington","doi":"10.1017/CBO9780511510816.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction As we saw in Chapter One, the latter Schumpeter (1942) had pessimistic prognoses about the future of capitalism, while the early Schumpeter (1911) did not articulate any social feedback problems. In this volume, we propose an American solution to the social feedback mechanism, one that is consistent with the work of the early Schumpeter. American capitalism differs from all other forms of industrial capitalism in its historical focus on both the creation of wealth (entrepreneurship) and the reconstitution of wealth (philanthropy). Philanthropy is part of the implicit social contract that continually nurtures and revitalizes economic prosperity (Schramm, 2005). Much of the new wealth created historically has been given back to the community to build up the great social institutions that have a positive feedback on future economic growth. This entrepreneurship-philanthropy nexus has not been fully explored by either economists or sociologists. We suggest that American philanthropists – especially those who have made their own fortunes – created foundations that, in turn, contributed to greater and more widespread economic prosperity through knowledge creation (Acs and Phillips, 2002). In traditional industrial societies, wealth creation, wealth ownership, and wealth distribution were, in great part, left up to the state or to organized religion. However, in an entrepreneurial society, individual initiative plays a vital role in propelling the economy and the society forward.","PeriodicalId":45990,"journal":{"name":"Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship","volume":"21 1","pages":"154-172"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2006-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511510816.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Introduction As we saw in Chapter One, the latter Schumpeter (1942) had pessimistic prognoses about the future of capitalism, while the early Schumpeter (1911) did not articulate any social feedback problems. In this volume, we propose an American solution to the social feedback mechanism, one that is consistent with the work of the early Schumpeter. American capitalism differs from all other forms of industrial capitalism in its historical focus on both the creation of wealth (entrepreneurship) and the reconstitution of wealth (philanthropy). Philanthropy is part of the implicit social contract that continually nurtures and revitalizes economic prosperity (Schramm, 2005). Much of the new wealth created historically has been given back to the community to build up the great social institutions that have a positive feedback on future economic growth. This entrepreneurship-philanthropy nexus has not been fully explored by either economists or sociologists. We suggest that American philanthropists – especially those who have made their own fortunes – created foundations that, in turn, contributed to greater and more widespread economic prosperity through knowledge creation (Acs and Phillips, 2002). In traditional industrial societies, wealth creation, wealth ownership, and wealth distribution were, in great part, left up to the state or to organized religion. However, in an entrepreneurial society, individual initiative plays a vital role in propelling the economy and the society forward.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创业、地理与美国经济增长:创业政策的形成
正如我们在第一章中看到的,熊彼特(1942)对资本主义的未来有悲观的预测,而早期熊彼特(1911)并没有阐明任何社会反馈问题。在本卷中,我们提出了一个美国解决方案的社会反馈机制,一个是一致的早期熊彼特的工作。美国资本主义与所有其他形式的工业资本主义的不同之处在于,它的历史重点是财富的创造(企业家精神)和财富的重构(慈善事业)。慈善事业是不断培育和振兴经济繁荣的隐性社会契约的一部分(Schramm, 2005)。历史上创造的大部分新财富都回馈给了社会,以建立伟大的社会制度,这些制度对未来的经济增长有积极的反馈。无论是经济学家还是社会学家,都没有对这种企业家与慈善事业之间的联系进行充分的探讨。我们认为,美国的慈善家——尤其是那些自己发家致富的人——建立了基金会,反过来,通过知识创造,为更大、更广泛的经济繁荣做出了贡献(Acs和Phillips, 2002)。在传统工业社会中,财富创造、财富所有权和财富分配在很大程度上是由国家或有组织的宗教决定的。然而,在一个企业家社会中,个人的主动性在推动经济和社会向前发展方面发挥着至关重要的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship publishes survey and tutorial articles in the following topics: - Nascent and start-up entrepreneurs - Opportunity recognition - New venture creation process - Business formation - Firm ownership - Market value and firm growth - Franchising - Managerial characteristics and behavior of entrepreneurs - Strategic alliances and networks - Government programs and public policy - Gender and ethnicity - New business financing - Business angels - Family-owned firms - Management structure, governance and performance - Corporate entrepreneurship - High technology - Small business and economic growth
期刊最新文献
Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Mechanisms Re-Conceptualizing Underrepresented Racial Minority Entrepreneurs Entrepreneurship in the Long-Run: Empirical Evidence and Historical Mechanisms The Impact of Constitutional Protection of Economic Rights on Entrepreneurship: A Taxonomic Survey Entrepreneurs’ Search for Sources of Knowledge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1