Pharmacist’s perception of the impact of electronic prescribing on medication errors and productivity in community pharmacies

IF 2.5 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Knowledge Management & E-Learning-An International Journal Pub Date : 2021-12-30 DOI:10.34105/j.kmel.2021.13.029
{"title":"Pharmacist’s perception of the impact of electronic prescribing on medication errors and productivity in community pharmacies","authors":"","doi":"10.34105/j.kmel.2021.13.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Paper-based prescriptions have been used for several decades by many healthcare practitioners. The literature suggests that several challenges are associated with handwritten prescriptions that might impact patients’ safety and medication errors. Electronic prescribing (e-prescribing) has been developed to phase out handwritten and computer-generated prescriptions that are printed on paper or faxed directly to a dispensing pharmacy. This research aimed to examine pharmacists’ thoughts about the e-prescribing impact on their practice. We also evaluated the adoption rate of e-prescribing by assessing the proportion of electronic prescriptions (e-Rx) received in community pharmacies across the Canadian provinces. This research was conducted as a secondary analysis of the 2016 National Survey of Community-Based Pharmacists: Use of Digital Health Technology in Practice by Nielson. The survey was conducted in collaboration between Canada Health Infoway and the Canadian Pharmacy Association. The target population of the survey was Canadian pharmacists who were in community practice. The provinces included in this research were Ontario, Quebec, Saskatchewan, Alberta, and British Columbia (n = 450). The findings of this study suggest that community pharmacists in Canada were willing to embrace e-prescribing to support their practice. Most of pharmacists thought that e-prescribing was a useful tool to reduce medication errors and improve efficiency in pharmacies. However, the largest proportion of prescriptions issued by prescribers continue to be in paper form, whether handwritten or computer-generated. Further research is needed to investigate the barriers to the adoption of e-prescribing systems among primary care practitioners in Canada.","PeriodicalId":45327,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge Management & E-Learning-An International Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge Management & E-Learning-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2021.13.029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Paper-based prescriptions have been used for several decades by many healthcare practitioners. The literature suggests that several challenges are associated with handwritten prescriptions that might impact patients’ safety and medication errors. Electronic prescribing (e-prescribing) has been developed to phase out handwritten and computer-generated prescriptions that are printed on paper or faxed directly to a dispensing pharmacy. This research aimed to examine pharmacists’ thoughts about the e-prescribing impact on their practice. We also evaluated the adoption rate of e-prescribing by assessing the proportion of electronic prescriptions (e-Rx) received in community pharmacies across the Canadian provinces. This research was conducted as a secondary analysis of the 2016 National Survey of Community-Based Pharmacists: Use of Digital Health Technology in Practice by Nielson. The survey was conducted in collaboration between Canada Health Infoway and the Canadian Pharmacy Association. The target population of the survey was Canadian pharmacists who were in community practice. The provinces included in this research were Ontario, Quebec, Saskatchewan, Alberta, and British Columbia (n = 450). The findings of this study suggest that community pharmacists in Canada were willing to embrace e-prescribing to support their practice. Most of pharmacists thought that e-prescribing was a useful tool to reduce medication errors and improve efficiency in pharmacies. However, the largest proportion of prescriptions issued by prescribers continue to be in paper form, whether handwritten or computer-generated. Further research is needed to investigate the barriers to the adoption of e-prescribing systems among primary care practitioners in Canada.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药剂师对电子处方对社区药房用药错误和生产力影响的看法
纸质处方已经被许多医疗从业者使用了几十年。文献表明,与手写处方相关的几个挑战可能会影响患者的安全和用药错误。电子处方(e-prescribing)的发展是为了逐步淘汰手写和电脑生成的处方,这些处方是打印在纸上或直接传真到配药药房。本研究旨在考察药师对电子处方对其实践影响的看法。我们还通过评估加拿大各省社区药房收到的电子处方(e-Rx)的比例来评估电子处方的采用率。本研究是对尼尔森2016年全国社区药剂师调查:在实践中使用数字健康技术进行的二次分析。这项调查是在加拿大卫生信息网和加拿大药房协会的合作下进行的。调查的目标人群是社区执业的加拿大药剂师。本研究包括安大略省、魁北克省、萨斯喀彻温省、阿尔伯塔省和不列颠哥伦比亚省(n = 450)。这项研究的结果表明,加拿大的社区药剂师愿意接受电子处方来支持他们的实践。大多数药剂师认为电子处方是减少用药错误和提高药房效率的有用工具。然而,开处方者开出的最大比例的处方仍然是纸质形式,无论是手写的还是电脑生成的。需要进一步的研究来调查加拿大初级保健从业者采用电子处方系统的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
33.30%
发文量
19
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
A scoping review comparing different mapping approaches pointing to the need for standardizing concept maps in medical education: A preliminary analysis Analyzing the syntax and salience of causal links embedded within semantic links in concept maps: Implications for temporal flow and learning transfer Concept maps for formative assessment: Creation and implementation of an automatic and intelligent evaluation method Editorial: Concept mapping: Improving learning and understanding Improving learning and understanding through concept mapping
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1