The effect of thickness and cement shade on the color match of different CAD-CAM glass-ceramic materials

IF 0.2 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of International Clinical Dental Research Organization Pub Date : 2022-12-31 DOI:10.5577/intdentres.457
Tuba Yılmaz Savaş
{"title":"The effect of thickness and cement shade on the color match of different CAD-CAM glass-ceramic materials","authors":"Tuba Yılmaz Savaş","doi":"10.5577/intdentres.457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study aimed to assess the impact of the type and thickness of the ceramic and cement color on the targeted shade of glass-ceramics with various chemical compositions.\nMethodology: Thirty ceramic specimens were prepared from leucite-reinforced (GC Initial LRF, GC Group) and lithium-disilicate (IPS e.max CAD, EM Group) materials in three different thicknesses (0.5 mm, 0.7 mm, and 1 mm). Four 4-mm-thick substrates were then made from A3-shaded composite resin material to mimic tooth structure and be utilized for cement application. Four shades (Variolink II: transparent, white, yellow, and bleach) of 0.2-mm-thick resin cement were polymerized over these substrates. Next, the specimens were placed over these substrates, and color measurements were applied with a spectrophotometer (VITA Easyshade V) leading to 24 group combinations (n=5). The color difference (∆E) readings were obtained in the spectrophotometer's reference shade verification mode by selecting the A2 shade standard. Three-way mixed ANOVA, Tukey HSD, and Bonferroni tests were used for statistical analysis (α=0.05).\nResults: The main effects of material, cement, and thickness were found to be statistically significant (p < 0.05), as were the interactions of cement×material, cement×thickness, and material×thickness (p < 0.05). However, the material×cement×thickness interaction was not found to be statistically significant (p = 0.568). Regardless of thickness or cement shade, the GC group had a lower mean ∆E value than that of the EM group (p < 0.05). Lower ∆E values were achieved in both materials with a thickness of 1 mm and bleach-shaded cement (p < 0.05). The materials with the greatest mean ∆E values were those with the thickness of 0.5 mm and the transparent shade cement combination (p < 0.05).\nConclusion: The thickness and shade of the cement used influenced the final color of the glass-ceramic materials with the same shade and translucency but diverse chemical compositions. When compared to the lithium disilicate glass-ceramic material, the leucite-reinforced feldspathic glass-ceramic material displayed lower color difference values and a better color match with the targeted shade.\n \nHow to cite this article: \nYılmaz Savaş T. The effect of thickness and cement shade on the color match of different CAD-CAM glass-ceramic materials. Int Dent Res 2022;12(Suppl.1):108-13. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.457\n \nLinguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.\n ","PeriodicalId":31322,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Clinical Dental Research Organization","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Clinical Dental Research Organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to assess the impact of the type and thickness of the ceramic and cement color on the targeted shade of glass-ceramics with various chemical compositions. Methodology: Thirty ceramic specimens were prepared from leucite-reinforced (GC Initial LRF, GC Group) and lithium-disilicate (IPS e.max CAD, EM Group) materials in three different thicknesses (0.5 mm, 0.7 mm, and 1 mm). Four 4-mm-thick substrates were then made from A3-shaded composite resin material to mimic tooth structure and be utilized for cement application. Four shades (Variolink II: transparent, white, yellow, and bleach) of 0.2-mm-thick resin cement were polymerized over these substrates. Next, the specimens were placed over these substrates, and color measurements were applied with a spectrophotometer (VITA Easyshade V) leading to 24 group combinations (n=5). The color difference (∆E) readings were obtained in the spectrophotometer's reference shade verification mode by selecting the A2 shade standard. Three-way mixed ANOVA, Tukey HSD, and Bonferroni tests were used for statistical analysis (α=0.05). Results: The main effects of material, cement, and thickness were found to be statistically significant (p < 0.05), as were the interactions of cement×material, cement×thickness, and material×thickness (p < 0.05). However, the material×cement×thickness interaction was not found to be statistically significant (p = 0.568). Regardless of thickness or cement shade, the GC group had a lower mean ∆E value than that of the EM group (p < 0.05). Lower ∆E values were achieved in both materials with a thickness of 1 mm and bleach-shaded cement (p < 0.05). The materials with the greatest mean ∆E values were those with the thickness of 0.5 mm and the transparent shade cement combination (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The thickness and shade of the cement used influenced the final color of the glass-ceramic materials with the same shade and translucency but diverse chemical compositions. When compared to the lithium disilicate glass-ceramic material, the leucite-reinforced feldspathic glass-ceramic material displayed lower color difference values and a better color match with the targeted shade.   How to cite this article: Yılmaz Savaş T. The effect of thickness and cement shade on the color match of different CAD-CAM glass-ceramic materials. Int Dent Res 2022;12(Suppl.1):108-13. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.457   Linguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
厚度和水泥色度对不同CAD-CAM玻璃陶瓷材料配色的影响
目的:本研究旨在评估不同化学成分的微晶玻璃的类型、厚度和水泥颜色对其目标色度的影响。方法:采用白晶石增强(GC Initial LRF, GC Group)和二硅酸锂(IPS e.max CAD, EM Group)三种不同厚度(0.5 mm, 0.7 mm和1mm)材料制备30个陶瓷样品。然后用a3阴影复合树脂材料制作4个4mm厚的基板来模拟牙齿结构,并用于水泥应用。四种颜色(Variolink II:透明、白色、黄色和漂白)的0.2 mm厚的树脂水泥在这些基质上聚合。接下来,将样品放置在这些底物上,并使用分光光度计(VITA easysshade V)进行颜色测量,导致24组组合(n=5)。色差(∆E)读数在分光光度计的参考色度验证模式下通过选择A2色度标准得到。采用三向混合方差分析、Tukey HSD检验和Bonferroni检验进行统计学分析(α=0.05)。结果:材料、水泥和厚度的主要影响有统计学意义(p < 0.05), cement×material、cement×thickness和material×thickness的相互作用也有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。然而,material×cement×thickness交互作用没有发现统计学意义(p = 0.568)。无论厚度或水泥阴影,GC组的平均∆E值均低于EM组(p < 0.05)。厚度为1 mm的两种材料和漂白剂遮蔽水泥的∆E值均较低(p < 0.05)。平均∆E值最大的材料是厚度为0.5 mm的材料和透明遮光水泥组合材料(p < 0.05)。结论:所使用的水泥的厚度和色度影响着相同色度和半透明但化学成分不同的玻璃陶瓷材料的最终颜色。与二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷材料相比,白晶石增强长石玻璃陶瓷材料的色差值更低,与目标色度的颜色匹配更好。本文引用方式:Yılmaz savavat T.厚度和水泥色度对不同CAD-CAM玻璃陶瓷材料配色的影响。国际医学杂志,2022;12(增刊1):108-13。https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.457语言修改:本手稿中的英语已由至少两名专业编辑检查,他们都是英语母语者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the accuracy of intraoral scanners used in single-unit implant prosthesis construction Evaluation of the buccal bone thickness in the anterior maxillary region using cone-beam computed tomography Evaluation of the alveolar bone and lingual concavity in the posterior mandibular region based on cone-beam computed tomography data Evaluation of the effect of class II fixed orthodontic treatment on the periradicular bone structure of endodontically treated mandibular molar teeth using fractal dimension analysis Analyzing biomimetic dentistry YouTube videos' quality and content
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1