A Case Study of LWD and Wireline Formation Pressure Tester on Depleted Reservoir of Offshore Development Sequential Wells, Kutai Basin, East Kalimantan, Indonesia

V. Manurung, G. R. Himawan, Laila Warkhaida, Ahmad Zulharman, Novri Citajaya, Setiadi Laksono
{"title":"A Case Study of LWD and Wireline Formation Pressure Tester on Depleted Reservoir of Offshore Development Sequential Wells, Kutai Basin, East Kalimantan, Indonesia","authors":"V. Manurung, G. R. Himawan, Laila Warkhaida, Ahmad Zulharman, Novri Citajaya, Setiadi Laksono","doi":"10.4043/31637-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The Kutai Basin, has been under production for more than 40 years and many wells have been drilled to develop the area. This has resulted in reservoir-induced drilling problems, like kicks and lost circulation due to depletion, while some high-pressure zones still exist. This complexity makes pore-pressure and stress analysis difficult. To address this problem, a comprehensive reservoir-evaluation program was developed by adding formation pressure testing to the planned quad-combo logging-while-drilling (LWD) program. Pressure measurements in this development stage were planned to aid the operator's understanding of the field's current hydraulic communication pathways, to relate reservoir characterization to the geological model. Emphasis was on the insight of static reservoir pressures, which are important for confirming fluid contacts and fluid density gradients.\n Methods of formation pressure testing have evolved over many years. Through this paper's case study, recent LWD and wireline pressure-testing technology are elaborated in depth, in relation to two sequential wells drilled offshore in the Kutai Basin. LWD pressure-testing operations were conducted in well XX-5 in a dedicated run after completion of drilling the section. The wireline test was conducted in well XX-4 as an open-hole logging run, along with the acquisition of fluid analysis data.\n Both systems were successfully utilized in the 6-inch hole sections of the subject wells, in a depleted reservoir, with the pressure overbalance expected to reach around 3100 psi in the pre-job planning stage. The average mobility was low in both sets of pressure test results, as also align with the reservoir's current depletion state. Challenges related to tight tests and lost seals in this mature field were experienced with both systems. The drilling environment and the formation's exposure conditions may have presented varying challenges; nevertheless, the same relatable quality has been achieved with both types of testing (LWD and wireline).\n This paper describes in detail the planning, design, and performance of pressure testing using LWD and wireline in the Kutai Basin. Comparisons between results are displayed to highlight the current character of the subject offshore field. This study aims to enhance future drilling and logging operations, by reviewing solutions from formation pressure testing technologies and to add value to mature and depleted field planning.\n Technical Categories: Geotechnical, Geoscience & Geophysics; Drilling Technology","PeriodicalId":11011,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, March 24, 2022","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, March 24, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/31637-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Kutai Basin, has been under production for more than 40 years and many wells have been drilled to develop the area. This has resulted in reservoir-induced drilling problems, like kicks and lost circulation due to depletion, while some high-pressure zones still exist. This complexity makes pore-pressure and stress analysis difficult. To address this problem, a comprehensive reservoir-evaluation program was developed by adding formation pressure testing to the planned quad-combo logging-while-drilling (LWD) program. Pressure measurements in this development stage were planned to aid the operator's understanding of the field's current hydraulic communication pathways, to relate reservoir characterization to the geological model. Emphasis was on the insight of static reservoir pressures, which are important for confirming fluid contacts and fluid density gradients. Methods of formation pressure testing have evolved over many years. Through this paper's case study, recent LWD and wireline pressure-testing technology are elaborated in depth, in relation to two sequential wells drilled offshore in the Kutai Basin. LWD pressure-testing operations were conducted in well XX-5 in a dedicated run after completion of drilling the section. The wireline test was conducted in well XX-4 as an open-hole logging run, along with the acquisition of fluid analysis data. Both systems were successfully utilized in the 6-inch hole sections of the subject wells, in a depleted reservoir, with the pressure overbalance expected to reach around 3100 psi in the pre-job planning stage. The average mobility was low in both sets of pressure test results, as also align with the reservoir's current depletion state. Challenges related to tight tests and lost seals in this mature field were experienced with both systems. The drilling environment and the formation's exposure conditions may have presented varying challenges; nevertheless, the same relatable quality has been achieved with both types of testing (LWD and wireline). This paper describes in detail the planning, design, and performance of pressure testing using LWD and wireline in the Kutai Basin. Comparisons between results are displayed to highlight the current character of the subject offshore field. This study aims to enhance future drilling and logging operations, by reviewing solutions from formation pressure testing technologies and to add value to mature and depleted field planning. Technical Categories: Geotechnical, Geoscience & Geophysics; Drilling Technology
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印尼东加里曼丹Kutai盆地海上开发序井衰竭油藏LWD和电缆地层压力测试案例研究
库台盆地已经生产了40多年,已经钻了许多井来开发该地区。这导致了油藏引起的钻井问题,如由于枯竭而产生的井涌和漏失,而一些高压层仍然存在。这种复杂性使得孔隙压力和应力分析变得困难。为了解决这一问题,开发了一套全面的储层评估方案,在计划中的四联随钻测井(LWD)方案中加入了地层压力测试。该开发阶段的压力测量旨在帮助作业者了解油田当前的水力通信路径,并将储层特征与地质模型联系起来。重点是了解静态油藏压力,这对于确定流体接触和流体密度梯度非常重要。地层压力测试方法已经发展了很多年。通过本文的案例研究,深入阐述了最近的随钻测井和电缆压力测试技术,并与Kutai盆地海上连续钻探的两口井有关。XX-5井在完成该段钻井后进行了LWD压力测试。该电缆测试在XX-4井进行,作为裸眼测井,同时采集了流体分析数据。这两种系统都成功地应用于某枯竭油藏的6英寸井段,在作业前规划阶段,压力过平衡预计将达到3100 psi左右。在两组压力测试结果中,平均流动性都很低,这也与储层目前的枯竭状态相一致。在该成熟油田,这两种系统都经历了与紧密测试和漏失密封相关的挑战。钻井环境和地层暴露条件可能会带来不同的挑战;然而,两种类型的测试(随钻测井和电缆)都达到了相同的相关质量。本文详细介绍了在库台盆地使用随钻测井和电缆进行压力测试的规划、设计和性能。显示结果之间的比较,以突出显示主题海上油田的当前特征。该研究旨在通过回顾地层压力测试技术的解决方案,提高未来的钻井和测井作业,并为成熟和枯竭油田的规划增加价值。技术类别:岩土工程、地球科学与地球物理;钻探技术
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Integrated Advance Petrophysical Evaluation for Heterolithic Clastics Reservoir Characterization Optimization in Malay Basin The Transformation Journey and Key Critical Success Factors of Turbomachinery Digital Remote Monitoring Biggest Wells Plug and Abandonment Campaign – Effective Management & Best Practices Implementation Zawtika Deferment Management Enhancement: A Systematic Way to Unlock Gas Potential for Optimized Operations Breakthrough Integration of 3-1/2? Tubing in 8-1/2? Hole Cemented Monobore for Successful Tubing Stem Test TST
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1