Safety and efficiency of the port-catheter for intensive intravenous chemotherapy in patients with multi-drug resistant tuberculosis and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis

S. Cherenko, N. Lytvynenko, O. Reva, O. Khmel, R. A. Veremeenenko, M. Pogrebna, Yu.A. Senko
{"title":"Safety and efficiency of the port-catheter for intensive intravenous chemotherapy in patients with multi-drug resistant tuberculosis and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis","authors":"S. Cherenko, N. Lytvynenko, O. Reva, O. Khmel, R. A. Veremeenenko, M. Pogrebna, Yu.A. Senko","doi":"10.32902/2663-0338-2018-18-1-19-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE. To study the efficacy and tolerability of the port catheter for continuous intravenous infusion in patients with MDR-TB and XDR-TB. \nMATERIALS AND METHODS. In a controlled study examined the effectiveness of the port catheter during an intensive 7-component anti-TB treatment with intravenous application of 3 anti-TB drugs (moxifloxacin, PAS, linezolid) in 16 patients with MDR-TB and XDR-TB. In the comparison group, which is formed by a pair of matching according to the drug resistance profile of MTB, the same intensive chemotherapy regimens in which the infusion of these drugs was carried out by daily injections of veins. In each group dominated patients with retreatment cases – 14 (87.5 %) patients. The planned duration of intravenous therapy was 2–4 months. \nRESULTS. Port-catheter for continuous infusion of combination of anti-tuberculosis drugs in comparison to their administration in the usual way ensures high efficiency and safety. In any case, was not observed phlebitis, no complaints of pain at the injection site, only 12.5 % cases were hematoma after setting the port in comparison to 100.0 % of patients with daily venous injections. In the study group was not a single case of interruption of intravenous infusion. In the control group, 56.2 % of patients discontinued intravenous treatment due to inability to penetrate the vein, patient’s complaints pain or phlebitis. At the end of the intensive phase of chemotherapy sputum conversion and disappearance of clinical symptoms were observed in 15 (3.7 %) patients of the study group, that was 26.7 % higher, than in control group (p>0,05). We found significant difference in terms of sputum conversion, which occurred in the study group through (2,2±0,1) months vs (3,7±0,3) months (<0,05) in control group. \nCONCLUSIONS. Port-catheter for long-term daily infusions of combination of anti-TB drugs compared with their usual daily injections is safe and effective method of intravenous therapy. It is not accompanied by subjective complaints of patients and the development of phlebitis, which leads to early sputum conversion. With daily injections of veins 56.2 % of patients prematurely discontinued treatment through intensive local complications or phlebitis. Application of intensive treatment with the introduction of anti-TB drugs allows for faster time to achieve sputum conversion.","PeriodicalId":13681,"journal":{"name":"Infusion & Chemotherapy","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infusion & Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32902/2663-0338-2018-18-1-19-24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE. To study the efficacy and tolerability of the port catheter for continuous intravenous infusion in patients with MDR-TB and XDR-TB. MATERIALS AND METHODS. In a controlled study examined the effectiveness of the port catheter during an intensive 7-component anti-TB treatment with intravenous application of 3 anti-TB drugs (moxifloxacin, PAS, linezolid) in 16 patients with MDR-TB and XDR-TB. In the comparison group, which is formed by a pair of matching according to the drug resistance profile of MTB, the same intensive chemotherapy regimens in which the infusion of these drugs was carried out by daily injections of veins. In each group dominated patients with retreatment cases – 14 (87.5 %) patients. The planned duration of intravenous therapy was 2–4 months. RESULTS. Port-catheter for continuous infusion of combination of anti-tuberculosis drugs in comparison to their administration in the usual way ensures high efficiency and safety. In any case, was not observed phlebitis, no complaints of pain at the injection site, only 12.5 % cases were hematoma after setting the port in comparison to 100.0 % of patients with daily venous injections. In the study group was not a single case of interruption of intravenous infusion. In the control group, 56.2 % of patients discontinued intravenous treatment due to inability to penetrate the vein, patient’s complaints pain or phlebitis. At the end of the intensive phase of chemotherapy sputum conversion and disappearance of clinical symptoms were observed in 15 (3.7 %) patients of the study group, that was 26.7 % higher, than in control group (p>0,05). We found significant difference in terms of sputum conversion, which occurred in the study group through (2,2±0,1) months vs (3,7±0,3) months (<0,05) in control group. CONCLUSIONS. Port-catheter for long-term daily infusions of combination of anti-TB drugs compared with their usual daily injections is safe and effective method of intravenous therapy. It is not accompanied by subjective complaints of patients and the development of phlebitis, which leads to early sputum conversion. With daily injections of veins 56.2 % of patients prematurely discontinued treatment through intensive local complications or phlebitis. Application of intensive treatment with the introduction of anti-TB drugs allows for faster time to achieve sputum conversion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多重耐药结核病和广泛耐药结核病患者静脉强化化疗的安全性和有效性
目的。目的:探讨port导管在耐多药和广泛耐药结核病患者持续静脉输注中的疗效和耐受性。材料和方法。在一项对照研究中,对16例耐多药结核病和广泛耐药结核病患者进行静脉应用3种抗结核药物(莫西沙星、PAS、利奈唑胺)的7组分强化抗结核治疗期间,检查了端口导管的有效性。对照组根据结核分枝杆菌耐药情况进行配对,采用相同的强化化疗方案,每日静脉注射这些药物。两组以再治疗为主,共14例(87.5%)。静脉治疗计划疗程2-4个月。结果。联合抗结核药物通过Port-catheter连续输注,与常规给药方式相比,具有更高的效率和安全性。在任何情况下,没有观察到静脉炎,注射部位没有疼痛的主诉,只有12.5%的病例在设置端口后出现血肿,而每日静脉注射的患者为100.0%。在研究组中没有一例静脉输注中断。在对照组中,56.2%的患者因无法穿透静脉、患者主诉疼痛或静脉炎而停止静脉治疗。在化疗强化期结束时,研究组15例(3.7%)患者痰转阴,临床症状消失,比对照组高26.7% (p < 0.05)。我们发现研究组的痰转化时间为(2,2±0,1)个月,对照组为(3,7±0,3)个月,差异有统计学意义(< 0.05)。结论。静脉导管长期每日输注联合抗结核药物与常规每日注射相比是一种安全有效的静脉治疗方法。不伴有患者主观主诉,发展为静脉炎,导致痰转早。每日静脉注射56.2%的患者因严重的局部并发症或静脉炎而过早停止治疗。通过引入抗结核药物进行强化治疗,可以更快地实现痰转化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the effectiveness of immunomodulator BI-V in the complex therapy of children and adolescents with multiple drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis Features of the course of pulmonary tuberculosis against the background of coronavirus infection according to computed tomography of the chest organs Risks of recurrence in people with pulmonary tuberculosis New and little-known possibilities of edaravone in the treatment of cerebral stroke and extracranial pathology Severe community-acquired pneumonia: principles of diagnostics and intensive therapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1