Using Machine Learning Methods to Identify Reservoir Compartmentalization in Mature Oilfields from Legacy Production Data

Kamlesh Ramcharitar, A. Ramdhanie
{"title":"Using Machine Learning Methods to Identify Reservoir Compartmentalization in Mature Oilfields from Legacy Production Data","authors":"Kamlesh Ramcharitar, A. Ramdhanie","doi":"10.2118/200979-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Despite long production histories, operators of mature oilfields sometimes struggle to account for reservoir compartmentalization. Geological-led workflows do not adequately honor legacy production data since inherent bias is introduced into the process of allocating production by interpreted flow units. This paper details the application of machine learning methods to identify possible reservoir compartments based on legacy production data recorded from individual well completions. We propose an experimental data-driven workflow to rapidly generate multiple scenarios of connected volumes in the subsurface. The workflow is premised upon the logic that well completions draining the same connected reservoir space can exhibit similar production characteristics (rate declines, GOR trends and pressures). We show how the specific challenges of digitized legacy data are solved using outlier detection for error checking and Kalman smoothing imputation for missing data in the structural time series model. Finally, we compare the subsurface grouping of completions obtained by applying unsupervised pattern recognition with Hierarchal clustering. Application of this workflow results in multiple possible scenarios for defining reservoir compartments based on production data trends only. The method is powerful in that, it provides interpretations that are independent of subsurface scenarios generated by more traditional workflows. We demonstrate the potential to integrate interpretations generated from more conventional workflows to increase the robustness of the overall subsurface model. We have leveraged the power of machine learning methods to classify more than forty (40) well completions into discrete reservoir compartments using production characteristics only. This effort would be extremely difficult, or otherwise unreliable given the inherent limitations of human spatial, temporal, and cognitive abilities.","PeriodicalId":11075,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, June 28, 2021","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, June 28, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/200979-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite long production histories, operators of mature oilfields sometimes struggle to account for reservoir compartmentalization. Geological-led workflows do not adequately honor legacy production data since inherent bias is introduced into the process of allocating production by interpreted flow units. This paper details the application of machine learning methods to identify possible reservoir compartments based on legacy production data recorded from individual well completions. We propose an experimental data-driven workflow to rapidly generate multiple scenarios of connected volumes in the subsurface. The workflow is premised upon the logic that well completions draining the same connected reservoir space can exhibit similar production characteristics (rate declines, GOR trends and pressures). We show how the specific challenges of digitized legacy data are solved using outlier detection for error checking and Kalman smoothing imputation for missing data in the structural time series model. Finally, we compare the subsurface grouping of completions obtained by applying unsupervised pattern recognition with Hierarchal clustering. Application of this workflow results in multiple possible scenarios for defining reservoir compartments based on production data trends only. The method is powerful in that, it provides interpretations that are independent of subsurface scenarios generated by more traditional workflows. We demonstrate the potential to integrate interpretations generated from more conventional workflows to increase the robustness of the overall subsurface model. We have leveraged the power of machine learning methods to classify more than forty (40) well completions into discrete reservoir compartments using production characteristics only. This effort would be extremely difficult, or otherwise unreliable given the inherent limitations of human spatial, temporal, and cognitive abilities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用机器学习方法从传统生产数据中识别成熟油田的储层划分
尽管有悠久的生产历史,但成熟油田的作业者有时仍难以解释油藏的区隔性。地质导向的工作流程不能充分尊重传统的生产数据,因为通过解释的流程单元将固有的偏见引入到分配生产的过程中。本文详细介绍了机器学习方法的应用,该方法基于单井完井记录的遗留生产数据来识别可能的储层。我们提出了一种实验性数据驱动的工作流程,以快速生成地下连接体的多个场景。该工作流程的前提是,在相同的连通储层空间,完井可以表现出相似的生产特征(速率下降、GOR趋势和压力)。我们展示了如何使用离群值检测进行错误检查和卡尔曼平滑插入来解决结构时间序列模型中缺失数据的数字化遗留数据的特定挑战。最后,比较了应用无监督模式识别和层次聚类所得到的补全的地下分组。该工作流程的应用产生了多种可能的场景,仅根据生产数据趋势来定义储层隔室。该方法的强大之处在于,它提供了独立于传统工作流程生成的地下场景的解释。我们展示了整合来自更传统工作流程的解释的潜力,以增加整个地下模型的稳健性。我们利用机器学习方法的力量,仅根据生产特征将40多口完井划分为离散的储层。考虑到人类空间、时间和认知能力的固有限制,这种努力将极其困难,或者不可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prediction of Energy Consumption by Ships at the port using Deep Learning A Review on future challenges and concerns associated with an Internet of Things based automatic health monitoring system Energy Efficient Data Mining Approach for Estimating the Diabetes Comparative Analysis of Modelling for Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting Solutions SDN Controller and Blockchain to Secure Information Transaction in a Cluster Structure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1