Endothelial Cell Loss After 3.5 mm Temporal Clear Corneal Incision and 3.5 mm Superior Scleral Tunnel Incision

M. Amon, R. Menapace, C. Vass, U. Radax
{"title":"Endothelial Cell Loss After 3.5 mm Temporal Clear Corneal Incision and 3.5 mm Superior Scleral Tunnel Incision","authors":"M. Amon,&nbsp;R. Menapace,&nbsp;C. Vass,&nbsp;U. Radax","doi":"10.1016/S0955-3681(13)80040-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>OBJECTIVE: To undertake a comparative study of endothelial cell loss after 3.5 mm temporal clear corneal incisions (tCCI) and 3.5 mm superior scleral tunnel incisions (sSTI). STUDY DESIGN: Besides the site and preparation of the incision all 59 eyes were operated with the same surgical technique and implantation of a flexible silicone intraocular lens (IOL) through a 3.5 mm incision. In group 1 a temporal clear corneal incision and in group 2 a superior scleral tunnel incision were prepared. Endothelial cell density was measured preoperatively and 6 months after surgery with a contact specular microscope (Konan®). The results were compared and statistically analysed. RESULTS: Mean endothelial cell loss was 8.1% in group 1 and 3.0% in group 2. Even though relevant differences were found between the 2 groups, in statistical analysis the significance was ‘borderline’ (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0964). CONCLUSIONS: Even though CCI is a promising surgical technique with high beneficial influence on surgery and postoperative outcome, an increased central endothelial cell loss may be expected after surgery. Because of this fact, in the opinion of the authors, this technique should be avoided in cases with very hard cataracts and/or in cases with low preoperative endothelial cell density. As shown in the literature, when performing a CCI it is advisable to create the incision at the temporal site and not at the superior site which is close to the central corneal region.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100500,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Implant and Refractive Surgery","volume":"7 4","pages":"Pages 229-231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0955-3681(13)80040-8","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Implant and Refractive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955368113800408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To undertake a comparative study of endothelial cell loss after 3.5 mm temporal clear corneal incisions (tCCI) and 3.5 mm superior scleral tunnel incisions (sSTI). STUDY DESIGN: Besides the site and preparation of the incision all 59 eyes were operated with the same surgical technique and implantation of a flexible silicone intraocular lens (IOL) through a 3.5 mm incision. In group 1 a temporal clear corneal incision and in group 2 a superior scleral tunnel incision were prepared. Endothelial cell density was measured preoperatively and 6 months after surgery with a contact specular microscope (Konan®). The results were compared and statistically analysed. RESULTS: Mean endothelial cell loss was 8.1% in group 1 and 3.0% in group 2. Even though relevant differences were found between the 2 groups, in statistical analysis the significance was ‘borderline’ (P < 0.0964). CONCLUSIONS: Even though CCI is a promising surgical technique with high beneficial influence on surgery and postoperative outcome, an increased central endothelial cell loss may be expected after surgery. Because of this fact, in the opinion of the authors, this technique should be avoided in cases with very hard cataracts and/or in cases with low preoperative endothelial cell density. As shown in the literature, when performing a CCI it is advisable to create the incision at the temporal site and not at the superior site which is close to the central corneal region.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
3.5 mm颞透明角膜切口和3.5 mm巩膜上隧道切口后内皮细胞的损失
目的:对3.5 mm颞透明角膜切口(tCCI)和3.5 mm巩膜上隧道切口(sSTI)后内皮细胞损失进行比较研究。研究设计:除了切口的位置和准备外,所有59只眼睛均采用相同的手术技术,并通过3.5 mm切口植入柔性硅胶人工晶状体(IOL)。组1为颞部角膜透明切口,组2为巩膜上隧道切口。术前和术后6个月用接触式镜面显微镜(Konan®)测量内皮细胞密度。对结果进行比较和统计分析。结果:1组平均内皮细胞损失8.1%,2组平均内皮细胞损失3.0%。尽管两组之间存在相关差异,但在统计学分析中,其显著性为“边缘性”(P <0.0964)。结论:尽管CCI是一种很有前景的手术技术,对手术和术后预后有很大的有益影响,但术后可能会增加中枢内皮细胞的损失。因此,作者认为,对于非常硬的白内障和/或术前内皮细胞密度低的患者,应避免使用该技术。如文献所示,在进行CCI时,建议在颞部切口,而不是在靠近角膜中央的上位切口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Subject Index Author Index Editorial Scleral Fixation Re-examined by Ultrasound Biomicroscopy Corneal Topography using a New Moiré Image-based System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1