Machine learning detection of dust impact signals observed by the Solar Orbiter

IF 1.7 4区 地球科学 Q3 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS Annales Geophysicae Pub Date : 2023-01-24 DOI:10.5194/angeo-41-69-2023
A. Kvammen, Kristoffer Wickstrøm, S. Kočiščák, J. Vaverka, L. Nouzák, A. Zaslavsky, Kristina Rackovic, Amalie Gjelsvik, D. Píša, J. Souček, I. Mann
{"title":"Machine learning detection of dust impact signals observed by the Solar Orbiter","authors":"A. Kvammen, Kristoffer Wickstrøm, S. Kočiščák, J. Vaverka, L. Nouzák, A. Zaslavsky, Kristina Rackovic, Amalie Gjelsvik, D. Píša, J. Souček, I. Mann","doi":"10.5194/angeo-41-69-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. This article presents the results of automatic detection of dust impact signals observed by the Solar Orbiter – Radio and Plasma Waves instrument. A sharp and characteristic electric field signal is observed by the Radio and Plasma Waves instrument when a dust particle impacts the spacecraft at high velocity. In this way, ∼ 5–20 dust impacts are daily detected as the Solar Orbiter travels through the interplanetary medium. The dust distribution in the inner solar system is largely uncharted and statistical studies of the detected dust impacts will enhance our understanding of the role of dust in the solar system. It is however challenging to automatically detect and separate dust signals from the plural of other signal shapes for two main reasons. Firstly, since the spacecraft charging causes variable shapes of the impact signals, and secondly because electromagnetic waves (such as solitary waves) may induce resembling electric field signals. In this article, we propose a novel machine learning-based framework for detection of dust impacts. We consider two different supervised machine learning approaches: the support vector machine classifier and the convolutional neural network classifier. Furthermore, we compare the performance of the machine learning classifiers to the currently used on-board classification algorithm and analyze 2 years of Radio and Plasma Waves instrument data. Overall, we conclude that detection of dust impact signals is a suitable task for supervised machine learning techniques. The convolutional neural network achieves the highest performance with 96 % ± 1 % overall classification accuracy and 94 % ± 2 % dust detection precision, a significant improvement to the currently used on-board classifier with 85 % overall classification accuracy and 75 % dust detection precision. In addition, both the support vector machine and the convolutional neural network classifiers detect more dust particles (on average) than the on-board classification algorithm, with 16 % ± 1 % and 18 % ± 8 % detection enhancement, respectively. The proposed convolutional neural network classifier (or similar tools) should therefore be considered for post-processing of the electric field signals observed by the Solar Orbiter.\n","PeriodicalId":50777,"journal":{"name":"Annales Geophysicae","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales Geophysicae","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-69-2023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract. This article presents the results of automatic detection of dust impact signals observed by the Solar Orbiter – Radio and Plasma Waves instrument. A sharp and characteristic electric field signal is observed by the Radio and Plasma Waves instrument when a dust particle impacts the spacecraft at high velocity. In this way, ∼ 5–20 dust impacts are daily detected as the Solar Orbiter travels through the interplanetary medium. The dust distribution in the inner solar system is largely uncharted and statistical studies of the detected dust impacts will enhance our understanding of the role of dust in the solar system. It is however challenging to automatically detect and separate dust signals from the plural of other signal shapes for two main reasons. Firstly, since the spacecraft charging causes variable shapes of the impact signals, and secondly because electromagnetic waves (such as solitary waves) may induce resembling electric field signals. In this article, we propose a novel machine learning-based framework for detection of dust impacts. We consider two different supervised machine learning approaches: the support vector machine classifier and the convolutional neural network classifier. Furthermore, we compare the performance of the machine learning classifiers to the currently used on-board classification algorithm and analyze 2 years of Radio and Plasma Waves instrument data. Overall, we conclude that detection of dust impact signals is a suitable task for supervised machine learning techniques. The convolutional neural network achieves the highest performance with 96 % ± 1 % overall classification accuracy and 94 % ± 2 % dust detection precision, a significant improvement to the currently used on-board classifier with 85 % overall classification accuracy and 75 % dust detection precision. In addition, both the support vector machine and the convolutional neural network classifiers detect more dust particles (on average) than the on-board classification algorithm, with 16 % ± 1 % and 18 % ± 8 % detection enhancement, respectively. The proposed convolutional neural network classifier (or similar tools) should therefore be considered for post-processing of the electric field signals observed by the Solar Orbiter.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
太阳轨道飞行器观测到的尘埃撞击信号的机器学习检测
摘要本文介绍了太阳轨道器-射电和等离子体波仪器对尘埃撞击信号自动检测的结果。当尘埃粒子以高速撞击航天器时,无线电和等离子体波仪器会观测到一个尖锐的特征电场信号。通过这种方式,当太阳轨道器在行星际介质中运行时,每天检测到约5-20次尘埃撞击。太阳系内部的尘埃分布在很大程度上是未知的,对探测到的尘埃影响的统计研究将增强我们对尘埃在太阳系中的作用的理解。然而,由于两个主要原因,自动检测和分离灰尘信号与其他信号形状的复数是具有挑战性的。首先,因为航天器的充电会引起不同形状的撞击信号,其次,因为电磁波(如孤波)可能会产生类似电场的信号。在本文中,我们提出了一种新的基于机器学习的检测粉尘影响的框架。我们考虑了两种不同的监督机器学习方法:支持向量机分类器和卷积神经网络分类器。此外,我们将机器学习分类器的性能与当前使用的车载分类算法进行了比较,并分析了2年的无线电和等离子体波仪器数据。总的来说,我们得出结论,粉尘撞击信号的检测是监督机器学习技术的合适任务。卷积神经网络达到了最高的性能,总体分类精度为96%±1%,粉尘检测精度为94%±2%,比目前使用的总体分类精度为85%,粉尘检测精度为75%的车载分类器有了显着提高。此外,支持向量机和卷积神经网络分类器比机载分类算法检测到更多的灰尘颗粒(平均),检测增强率分别为16%±1%和18%±8%。因此,应考虑使用卷积神经网络分类器(或类似工具)对太阳轨道飞行器观测到的电场信号进行后处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annales Geophysicae
Annales Geophysicae 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Annales Geophysicae (ANGEO) is a not-for-profit international multi- and inter-disciplinary scientific open-access journal in the field of solar–terrestrial and planetary sciences. ANGEO publishes original articles and short communications (letters) on research of the Sun–Earth system, including the science of space weather, solar–terrestrial plasma physics, the Earth''s ionosphere and atmosphere, the magnetosphere, and the study of planets and planetary systems, the interaction between the different spheres of a planet, and the interaction across the planetary system. Topics range from space weathering, planetary magnetic field, and planetary interior and surface dynamics to the formation and evolution of planetary systems.
期刊最新文献
Ionospheric upwelling and the level of associated noise at solar minimum Sensitivity analysis of a Martian atmospheric column model with data from the Mars Science Laboratory Low-frequency solar radio type II bursts and their association with space weather events during the ascending phase of solar cycle 25 The investigation of June 21 and 25, 2015 CMEs using EUHFORIA Observations of ionospheric disturbances associated with the 2020 Beirut explosion by Defense Meteorological Satellite Program and ground-based ionosondes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1