Using the radiocarbon dates of Central Africa for studying long-term demographic trends of the last 50,000 years: potential and pitfalls

IF 1.1 2区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Azania-Archaeological Research in Africa Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI:10.1080/0067270X.2023.2215649
B. Clist, J. Denbow, Raymond Lanfranchi
{"title":"Using the radiocarbon dates of Central Africa for studying long-term demographic trends of the last 50,000 years: potential and pitfalls","authors":"B. Clist, J. Denbow, Raymond Lanfranchi","doi":"10.1080/0067270X.2023.2215649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper presents the first review of biases impacting Pleistocene and Holocene radiocarbon dates from Central Africa. Based on the pooling of the research expertise of the co-authors, twenty-four biases are listed, explained and documented and their impact on any radiocarbon date corpus demonstrated. To achieve this, a new corpus has been created of 1764 radiocarbon and TL assays from 601 archaeological sites published in the literature. Each date has been checked for its context. The irregular dynamics of research in space and time seriously impact the end result of previous analyses aiming to achieve a regional understanding of past demographic fluctuations. While peaks in the number of dates from the late Holocene seem to correspond to a positive demographic trend, it is suggested that the declines identified cannot be of any such use for the time being and that today’s picture does not presently support claims of a population “crash” at a regional or local level for any time period. The numbers are obscured by overall research deficits identifiable throughout the region. The maps of the dated sites presented offer good evidence of this and illustrate the vast expanses where no archaeological research has yet been carried out. The number of radiocarbon dates in Central Africa is more an indicator of the effort archaeologists have put into understanding a settlement than it is of ancient demographics. Successive waves of incoming people since c. 3500–3000 cal. BP, the two most important ones known since the 1990s, have created a cultural mosaic of coexisting technological groups. The last 40 years of research have revealed the inner complexity of these waves, some of which avoided parts of the region for centuries, thereby creating an irregular cultural mosaic of land use that is outlined by patterning in the radiocarbon dates.","PeriodicalId":45689,"journal":{"name":"Azania-Archaeological Research in Africa","volume":"441 1","pages":"235 - 293"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Azania-Archaeological Research in Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0067270X.2023.2215649","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper presents the first review of biases impacting Pleistocene and Holocene radiocarbon dates from Central Africa. Based on the pooling of the research expertise of the co-authors, twenty-four biases are listed, explained and documented and their impact on any radiocarbon date corpus demonstrated. To achieve this, a new corpus has been created of 1764 radiocarbon and TL assays from 601 archaeological sites published in the literature. Each date has been checked for its context. The irregular dynamics of research in space and time seriously impact the end result of previous analyses aiming to achieve a regional understanding of past demographic fluctuations. While peaks in the number of dates from the late Holocene seem to correspond to a positive demographic trend, it is suggested that the declines identified cannot be of any such use for the time being and that today’s picture does not presently support claims of a population “crash” at a regional or local level for any time period. The numbers are obscured by overall research deficits identifiable throughout the region. The maps of the dated sites presented offer good evidence of this and illustrate the vast expanses where no archaeological research has yet been carried out. The number of radiocarbon dates in Central Africa is more an indicator of the effort archaeologists have put into understanding a settlement than it is of ancient demographics. Successive waves of incoming people since c. 3500–3000 cal. BP, the two most important ones known since the 1990s, have created a cultural mosaic of coexisting technological groups. The last 40 years of research have revealed the inner complexity of these waves, some of which avoided parts of the region for centuries, thereby creating an irregular cultural mosaic of land use that is outlined by patterning in the radiocarbon dates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用中非的放射性碳年代来研究过去5万年的长期人口趋势:潜力和陷阱
摘要本文首次回顾了影响中非更新世和全新世放射性碳测年的偏差。在汇集了共同作者的研究专长的基础上,列出、解释和记录了24种偏差,并证明了它们对任何放射性碳日期语料库的影响。为了实现这一目标,已经创建了一个新的语料库,其中包括来自601个考古遗址的1764个放射性碳和TL分析。已经检查了每个日期的上下文。研究在空间和时间上的不规则动态严重影响了以往旨在实现对过去人口波动的区域理解的分析的最终结果。虽然从全新世晚期开始的日期数量的峰值似乎与一个积极的人口趋势相对应,但有人认为,目前确定的下降不能有任何这样的用途,而且目前的情况并不支持在任何时期内区域或地方层面上的人口“崩溃”的说法。这些数字被整个地区可识别的总体研究赤字所掩盖。这些有年代的遗址的地图为这一点提供了很好的证据,并说明了尚未进行考古研究的广阔地区。中非放射性碳测年的数量更多地是考古学家为了解一个定居点所付出的努力的一个指标,而不是古代人口统计学的指标。自公元前3500-3000年以来,连续不断的移民潮(自20世纪90年代以来已知的最重要的两次移民潮)创造了共存的技术群体的文化马赛克。过去40年的研究揭示了这些波浪的内在复杂性,其中一些波浪几个世纪以来一直避开该地区的某些地区,从而形成了一种不规则的土地使用文化马赛克,这是通过放射性碳年代的模式来概述的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Kasongo-Tongoni: a nineteenth-century caravan town in Maniema, Democratic Republic of Congo Pleistocene archaeology and environments of the Free State, South Africa PhD Abstract Adornment deposits: a study of bead and jewellery remains from Late Antiquity tombs in the Red Sea port of Berenike Paul Sinclair (1949–2023) — In memoriam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1