Dexmedetomidine Versus Remifentanil Monitored Anesthesia Care During Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Retrospective Study

R. Mencucci, Chiara De Vitto, Michela Cennamo, Samuela Pierucci, C. Adembri
{"title":"Dexmedetomidine Versus Remifentanil Monitored Anesthesia Care During Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Retrospective Study","authors":"R. Mencucci, Chiara De Vitto, Michela Cennamo, Samuela Pierucci, C. Adembri","doi":"10.1097/coa.0000000000000014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is usually performed under topical or locoregional anesthesia; a sedation is often required. Several drugs are administered but undesirable side effects limit the use of each medication. Dexmedetomidine (DEX), a sedative-analgesic, has minimal respiratory depressant effects, and its use in DMEK surgery has not been reported. This study compares the use of DEX versus Remifentanil (REMI) during DMEK.\n \n \n \n Retrospective, observational, single-center study. Forty-two patients received sedation with DEX or REMI. Heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation were always recorded during the procedure. The degree of sedation was evaluated using the Ramsay sedation scale; preoperative evaluation of anxiety disorders was carried out with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, while patients' and surgeon's satisfaction was evaluated using the 7-point Likert-like verbal rating scale.\n \n \n \n Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as the baseline anxiety trait were similar for the 2 groups. Patients and surgeons reported higher satisfaction scores with DEX compared to patients receiving REMI (P < 0.01; P < 0.001). The intraoperative Ramsay score was 3 in 62% of patients in Group DEX and 23% in Group REMI; conversely, it was 2 in 38% of DEX Group and 77% in REMI Group (P < 0.02). No statistical difference in the hemodynamic and respiratory parameters between the 2 groups was recorded.\n \n \n \n With similar stability of hemodynamic and respiratory parameters, Dexmedetomedine provided a deeper sedation than REMI without respiratory depression, resulting in better surgical performance in terms of the patients' and the surgeon's satisfaction, thus suggesting a possible role for sedation during DMEK surgery.\n","PeriodicalId":72708,"journal":{"name":"Cornea open","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cornea open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/coa.0000000000000014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is usually performed under topical or locoregional anesthesia; a sedation is often required. Several drugs are administered but undesirable side effects limit the use of each medication. Dexmedetomidine (DEX), a sedative-analgesic, has minimal respiratory depressant effects, and its use in DMEK surgery has not been reported. This study compares the use of DEX versus Remifentanil (REMI) during DMEK. Retrospective, observational, single-center study. Forty-two patients received sedation with DEX or REMI. Heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation were always recorded during the procedure. The degree of sedation was evaluated using the Ramsay sedation scale; preoperative evaluation of anxiety disorders was carried out with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, while patients' and surgeon's satisfaction was evaluated using the 7-point Likert-like verbal rating scale. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as the baseline anxiety trait were similar for the 2 groups. Patients and surgeons reported higher satisfaction scores with DEX compared to patients receiving REMI (P < 0.01; P < 0.001). The intraoperative Ramsay score was 3 in 62% of patients in Group DEX and 23% in Group REMI; conversely, it was 2 in 38% of DEX Group and 77% in REMI Group (P < 0.02). No statistical difference in the hemodynamic and respiratory parameters between the 2 groups was recorded. With similar stability of hemodynamic and respiratory parameters, Dexmedetomedine provided a deeper sedation than REMI without respiratory depression, resulting in better surgical performance in terms of the patients' and the surgeon's satisfaction, thus suggesting a possible role for sedation during DMEK surgery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
右美托咪定与瑞芬太尼在内皮角膜移植术中监测麻醉护理:一项回顾性研究
Descemet的膜内皮角膜移植术(DMEK)通常在局部或局部麻醉下进行;通常需要镇静。使用了几种药物,但不良的副作用限制了每种药物的使用。右美托咪定(DEX)是一种镇静镇痛药,具有最小的呼吸抑制作用,其在DMEK手术中的应用尚未见报道。本研究比较了在DMEK期间使用DEX和Remifentanil (REMI)。回顾性、观察性、单中心研究。42例患者使用DEX或REMI镇静。在手术过程中始终记录心率、血压、血氧饱和度。采用Ramsay镇静量表评价镇静程度;术前焦虑障碍评估采用医院焦虑抑郁量表,患者和外科医生满意度评估采用李克特7分口头评定量表。两组的基线人口学和临床特征以及基线焦虑特征相似。与接受REMI的患者相比,患者和外科医生报告的DEX满意度得分更高(P < 0.01;P < 0.001)。DEX组62%的患者术中Ramsay评分为3分,REMI组23%;DEX组为38%,REMI组为77%,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.02)。两组患者血流动力学及呼吸参数差异无统计学意义。右美托美定在血流动力学和呼吸参数稳定性相似的情况下,其镇静作用比REMI更深,且无呼吸抑制,手术效果更好,患者和外科医生的满意度更高,提示在DMEK手术中可能具有镇静作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Multimodal Imaging of Posterior Corneal Opacities in Multicentric Osteolysis Nodulosis and Arthropathy (MONA). Bilateral Light-Adjustable Lens Implantation in a Patient With 50-Cut Radial Keratotomy. Suture-Less and Glue-Less Amniotic Membrane Graft for Keratopathy and Early Keratinization in Drug Reaction With Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms Syndrome Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty for Late Corneal Edema Secondary to Obstetrical Forceps–Related Tears Fragmentation in Bowman Layer: An In Vivo Confocal Microscopy Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1