Social Validity of Paediatric Feeding Treatment across Goals, Processes, and Outcomes

IF 0.4 4区 心理学 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES Child & Family Behavior Therapy Pub Date : 2022-05-09 DOI:10.1080/07317107.2022.2068780
Tessa Taylor, S. Taylor
{"title":"Social Validity of Paediatric Feeding Treatment across Goals, Processes, and Outcomes","authors":"Tessa Taylor, S. Taylor","doi":"10.1080/07317107.2022.2068780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Social validity of treatment for paediatric feeding disorders can be defined as the extent to which caregivers find treatment goals and procedures acceptable, and the level of satisfaction with the outcomes of treatment. However, there are few studies which examine social validity data, or that evaluate social validity against key treatment variables. The aim of this report was to compare caregiver ratings of treatment acceptability and satisfaction against treatment variables. Social validity measures were obtained from the caregivers of all children consecutively admitted to a home-based behaviour-analytic treatment programme for paediatric feeding disorders (N = 32) in Australia. All children (M = 6 years, range 2–13 y) had severe feeding problems and most had mealtime skill deficits and autism and developmental delays or intellectual disabilities. Social validity measures included treatment acceptability and satisfaction surveys. In a retrospective analysis, social validity scores were compared against variables including participant characteristics and goals, treatment procedures, and treatment outcome. The retrospective analysis identified no significant correlations. In this sample, caregiver social validity ratings were very high, and data-based treatment outcomes for all children showed high levels of clinical significance including consumption, food variety, and feeding skill development. This report is the first to examine social validity in a data-based manner. With the exception of duration of treatment, no further relations were identified. Whilst the findings may be impacted by little variability/ceiling effects, this further communicates that the empirically-supported treatment for a paediatric feeding disorders is highly effective, and highly valued by caregivers of children. It is recommended that further data-based research continue to examine further measures and determinants of social validity.","PeriodicalId":46418,"journal":{"name":"Child & Family Behavior Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child & Family Behavior Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07317107.2022.2068780","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Social validity of treatment for paediatric feeding disorders can be defined as the extent to which caregivers find treatment goals and procedures acceptable, and the level of satisfaction with the outcomes of treatment. However, there are few studies which examine social validity data, or that evaluate social validity against key treatment variables. The aim of this report was to compare caregiver ratings of treatment acceptability and satisfaction against treatment variables. Social validity measures were obtained from the caregivers of all children consecutively admitted to a home-based behaviour-analytic treatment programme for paediatric feeding disorders (N = 32) in Australia. All children (M = 6 years, range 2–13 y) had severe feeding problems and most had mealtime skill deficits and autism and developmental delays or intellectual disabilities. Social validity measures included treatment acceptability and satisfaction surveys. In a retrospective analysis, social validity scores were compared against variables including participant characteristics and goals, treatment procedures, and treatment outcome. The retrospective analysis identified no significant correlations. In this sample, caregiver social validity ratings were very high, and data-based treatment outcomes for all children showed high levels of clinical significance including consumption, food variety, and feeding skill development. This report is the first to examine social validity in a data-based manner. With the exception of duration of treatment, no further relations were identified. Whilst the findings may be impacted by little variability/ceiling effects, this further communicates that the empirically-supported treatment for a paediatric feeding disorders is highly effective, and highly valued by caregivers of children. It is recommended that further data-based research continue to examine further measures and determinants of social validity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿科喂养治疗的目标、过程和结果的社会有效性
儿科喂养障碍治疗的社会效度可以定义为照顾者发现治疗目标和程序可接受的程度,以及对治疗结果的满意程度。然而,很少有研究检验社会效度数据,或根据关键治疗变量评估社会效度。本报告的目的是比较护理人员对治疗可接受性和治疗变量满意度的评分。社会效度测量是从澳大利亚所有儿童的照顾者那里获得的,这些儿童连续接受了以家庭为基础的儿童喂养障碍行为分析治疗方案(N = 32)。所有儿童(M = 6岁,范围2-13岁)都有严重的喂养问题,大多数有用餐时间技能缺陷、自闭症、发育迟缓或智力残疾。社会效度测量包括治疗可接受性和满意度调查。在回顾性分析中,社会效度得分与包括参与者特征和目标、治疗程序和治疗结果在内的变量进行了比较。回顾性分析未发现显著相关性。在这个样本中,照顾者的社会效度评分非常高,所有儿童的基于数据的治疗结果显示出高水平的临床意义,包括消费、食物种类和喂养技能发展。该报告是第一个以数据为基础的方式研究社会有效性的报告。除治疗时间外,未发现进一步的关系。虽然研究结果可能受到小变异性/上限效应的影响,但这进一步表明,经验支持的儿科喂养障碍治疗非常有效,受到儿童照顾者的高度重视。建议进一步以数据为基础的研究继续检查社会有效性的进一步措施和决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Family Engagement in Mental Health Interventions for Young Children Effectiveness of Integrative Structural Family Therapy and Double ABCX Model on Marital Adjustment and Parenting Stress Among Parents of Children with Autism: Randomized Controlled Trial Parent-Child Interaction Therapy with an Autistic Child and Autistic Father: A Case Study Effectiveness of Filial Therapy on Preschool Children’s Internalization and Externalization Symptoms with an Insecure Attachment Style During Coronavirus Disease 19 in Tehran District 10 Newborn Handbook for New Dads: Expert Advice on How to Navigate Baby’s First Three Months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1