Noise and Occupational Medicine: Common Practice Problems.

Andrew L Phillips, Ryan Cooney, Zachary B Harris, D. Myrtil, M. Hodgson
{"title":"Noise and Occupational Medicine: Common Practice Problems.","authors":"Andrew L Phillips, Ryan Cooney, Zachary B Harris, D. Myrtil, M. Hodgson","doi":"10.1097/JOM.0000000000001728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) represents the second most common occupational disease in the US. Although the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has promulgated an occupational noise exposure standard and associated recordkeeping requirements, OSHA inspections increasingly document practices that violate both the noise standard and recordkeeping regulation. This paper describes five deviations from good clinical practices masking the true societal costs of NIHL, leading to missed prevention opportunities, and creating burdens for individuals and society. These include attributing NIHL to non-occupational sources, exculpating the workplace because of audiogram patterns without careful documentation, ignoring symptoms or physical examination findings, and simply denying work-relatedness, leading to employers inappropriately lining-out cases from the OSHA 300 log. The practices identified by OSHA suggest that many individuals are not following widely recognized and accepted practices when administering hearing conservation programs.","PeriodicalId":46545,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000001728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

: Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) represents the second most common occupational disease in the US. Although the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has promulgated an occupational noise exposure standard and associated recordkeeping requirements, OSHA inspections increasingly document practices that violate both the noise standard and recordkeeping regulation. This paper describes five deviations from good clinical practices masking the true societal costs of NIHL, leading to missed prevention opportunities, and creating burdens for individuals and society. These include attributing NIHL to non-occupational sources, exculpating the workplace because of audiogram patterns without careful documentation, ignoring symptoms or physical examination findings, and simply denying work-relatedness, leading to employers inappropriately lining-out cases from the OSHA 300 log. The practices identified by OSHA suggest that many individuals are not following widely recognized and accepted practices when administering hearing conservation programs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
噪音与职业医学:常见的实践问题。
噪音性听力损失(NIHL)是美国第二大常见的职业病。尽管职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)已经颁布了职业噪音暴露标准和相关的记录保存要求,但OSHA检查越来越多地记录了违反噪音标准和记录保存规定的做法。本文描述了五种偏离良好临床实践的情况,掩盖了NIHL的真实社会成本,导致错过预防机会,并给个人和社会带来负担。其中包括将NIHL归因于非职业原因,在没有仔细记录的情况下以听图模式为工作场所开脱,忽视症状或体检结果,以及简单地否认工作相关性,导致雇主不恰当地从OSHA 300日志中列出病例。OSHA确定的做法表明,许多人在管理听力保护计划时没有遵循广泛认可和接受的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Use of Metabolomic Tool in Assessing Environmental Exposure Fine and Ultrafine Particle Pollution Before and After a Smoking ban in the Catering Industry in Vienna Investigating the level of Safety Considerations in Radiology Centers (North of Iran): Cross –Sectional Study New Highlights. The Last Note.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1