PG61 Breaking bad news, use of actors, immersion suite and ‘in character’ debrief to develop Emergency Nurses

C. Mather, Victoria McGloughlin
{"title":"PG61 Breaking bad news, use of actors, immersion suite and ‘in character’ debrief to develop Emergency Nurses","authors":"C. Mather, Victoria McGloughlin","doi":"10.1136/bmjstel-2020-aspihconf.109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Communicating in the Emergency department is challenging, as this is the only part of a hospital that is ‘unbounded’ with a potential unlimited number of presentations. Staff deal with up to 42 communication events per hour, with this time pressure impacting on the effectiveness of communicating with patients, families and colleagues.1 Nurses are frequently in a position to deliver ‘bad news’.2 This is never as common an occurrence as in the domain of Emergency Care. There are many reasons this interaction needs to be done well,3 consensus appears to cite Nurses as lacking confidence in performing this role.4 As part of an innovative Emergency Care module, an educational intervention was designed as follows; a cohort of 30 emergency care staff where taught by an experienced palliative care education lead in a theoretical classroom session on communication theory, with particular focus on the SPIKES model.5 Simulated scenarios then took place in an immersion suite, streamed back into the classroom. Two briefed and experienced simulated patients were used. The candidates from the group were given a ‘handover’ prior to entering the simulation setting. A facilitator was in the classroom keeping focus on observation and note taking. A second facilitator was in the immersion suite (off camera) to ensure technical/pastoral support and time keeping. Upon completion of scenarios, the candidates and actors returned to debrief the scenario with vicarious learning from the ‘audience’. The simulated patients remained in character to provide valuable ‘in role’ feedback. Before subsequently taking part in a broader debrief with the group. Candidate feedback; ‘Gained knowledge of importance of body language and now feel more comfortable handling breaking bad news/difficult conversations’. ‘Knowing models like SPIKE etc will help me structure conversations with patients more effectively and also enable constructive reflection.’ ‘It was excellent - thank you!’ Simulated patient feedback; ‘Everyone seemed invested and it felt really useful to be able to discuss ‘in role’, I felt that there was a lot of positivity. The immersion suite was a really interesting way of facilitating scenarios as it added to the reality and atmosphere for the participant, and preserved the intimacy of the interaction.’ Reference Malone M & Biese K. ( 2018) Care for the older adult in the emergency department, an issue of clinics in geriatric medicine. Elsevier. U.S.A Grudzen C, Richardson L, Johnson P, Hu M, Wang B, Ortiz J, Kistler E, Chen A and Morrison R. Emergency Department-initiated palliative care in advanced cancer: A randomised clinical trial. JAMA Oncology 2016;Vol 1;2 (5):p591598. JAMA Network.","PeriodicalId":44757,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2020-aspihconf.109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Communicating in the Emergency department is challenging, as this is the only part of a hospital that is ‘unbounded’ with a potential unlimited number of presentations. Staff deal with up to 42 communication events per hour, with this time pressure impacting on the effectiveness of communicating with patients, families and colleagues.1 Nurses are frequently in a position to deliver ‘bad news’.2 This is never as common an occurrence as in the domain of Emergency Care. There are many reasons this interaction needs to be done well,3 consensus appears to cite Nurses as lacking confidence in performing this role.4 As part of an innovative Emergency Care module, an educational intervention was designed as follows; a cohort of 30 emergency care staff where taught by an experienced palliative care education lead in a theoretical classroom session on communication theory, with particular focus on the SPIKES model.5 Simulated scenarios then took place in an immersion suite, streamed back into the classroom. Two briefed and experienced simulated patients were used. The candidates from the group were given a ‘handover’ prior to entering the simulation setting. A facilitator was in the classroom keeping focus on observation and note taking. A second facilitator was in the immersion suite (off camera) to ensure technical/pastoral support and time keeping. Upon completion of scenarios, the candidates and actors returned to debrief the scenario with vicarious learning from the ‘audience’. The simulated patients remained in character to provide valuable ‘in role’ feedback. Before subsequently taking part in a broader debrief with the group. Candidate feedback; ‘Gained knowledge of importance of body language and now feel more comfortable handling breaking bad news/difficult conversations’. ‘Knowing models like SPIKE etc will help me structure conversations with patients more effectively and also enable constructive reflection.’ ‘It was excellent - thank you!’ Simulated patient feedback; ‘Everyone seemed invested and it felt really useful to be able to discuss ‘in role’, I felt that there was a lot of positivity. The immersion suite was a really interesting way of facilitating scenarios as it added to the reality and atmosphere for the participant, and preserved the intimacy of the interaction.’ Reference Malone M & Biese K. ( 2018) Care for the older adult in the emergency department, an issue of clinics in geriatric medicine. Elsevier. U.S.A Grudzen C, Richardson L, Johnson P, Hu M, Wang B, Ortiz J, Kistler E, Chen A and Morrison R. Emergency Department-initiated palliative care in advanced cancer: A randomised clinical trial. JAMA Oncology 2016;Vol 1;2 (5):p591598. JAMA Network.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PG61突发坏消息,使用演员,沉浸式套件和“角色”汇报来开发紧急护士
在急诊科沟通是具有挑战性的,因为这是医院中唯一一个“不受限制”的部分,可能有无限数量的演示。工作人员每小时要处理多达42个沟通事件,这种时间压力影响了与患者、家属和同事沟通的有效性护士经常处于传递“坏消息”的位置这种情况在紧急护理领域从来没有发生过。这种互动需要做好的原因有很多,共识似乎是护士在扮演这一角色方面缺乏信心作为创新的紧急护理模块的一部分,设计了以下教育干预措施:一组30名急诊护理人员,由经验丰富的姑息治疗教育领导讲授沟通理论课堂课程,特别侧重于SPIKES模型然后,模拟场景在浸入式套件中进行,并传回教室。我们使用了两名经验丰富的模拟患者。这组候选人在进入模拟环境之前进行了“交接”。一个引导者在教室里专注于观察和记笔记。另一名协调员在沉浸式套件中(镜头外),以确保技术/牧师支持和时间保持。场景完成后,候选人和演员回到现场,向“观众”进行模拟学习。模拟的病人保持在角色中,以提供有价值的“角色”反馈。在随后参加更广泛的小组汇报之前。候选人的反馈;“了解了肢体语言的重要性,现在可以更自如地处理突发坏消息/棘手的对话。”“了解SPIKE等模型将帮助我更有效地组织与患者的对话,并进行建设性的反思。“太棒了——谢谢你!”模拟患者反馈;“每个人似乎都很投入,能够讨论‘在角色中’真的很有用,我觉得有很多积极的东西。”沉浸式套件是一种非常有趣的促进场景的方式,因为它为参与者增加了现实感和氛围,并保留了互动的亲近感。参考文献Malone M & Biese K.(2018)急诊科老年人的护理,老年医学诊所的问题。爱思唯尔。刘建军,刘建军,刘建军,王斌,刘建军,刘建军,刘建军,刘建军,刘建军。JAMA Oncology; 2016;Vol . 1;2 (5):p591598。《美国医学会杂志》网络。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of Simulation-based Training on Reflective Practice. Virtual tabletop simulations for primary care pandemic preparedness and response. Developing a simulation programme to train airway management during the COVID-19 pandemic in a tertiary-level hospital. Interprofessional teamwork for managing medical deterioration in pregnancy: what contributes to good clinical performance in simulated practice? Age suit simulation replicates in healthy young adults the functional challenges to balance experienced by older adults: an observational study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1