Antegrade and retrograde access in the endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal chronic total occlusions

M. Donbaloğlu, S. Gürkan, O. Gur
{"title":"Antegrade and retrograde access in the endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal chronic total occlusions","authors":"M. Donbaloğlu, S. Gürkan, O. Gur","doi":"10.9739/tjvs.2023.04.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: In this study, the aim was to investigate whether antegrade or retrograde approaches are superior in the endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal chronic total occlusions (CTO). Material and Methods: A total of 437 patients who were diagnosed with CTO in the femoropopliteal region and who subsequently underwent endovascular procedures between February 2019 and April 2022 were evaluated retrospectively. The patients were grouped as antegrade access and retrograde access. All patients were classified according to the Rutherford and TASC (Transatlantic Intersociety Consensus II) classification. The patients were followed for 2 years. Above-ankle amputation and >50% stenosis in the target vessel were considered a failure. ABI, improvement in clinical symptoms, and limb salvage were evaluated in controls. Results: Antegrade approach was performed in 218 of the endovascular procedures. Antegrade recanalization was successful in 201 patients (92.2%), and failed antegrade attempt was seen in 17 because the lesion could not be crossed. Retrograde approach was used in 197 of endovascular interventions. Successful retrograde recanalization was unsuccessful in 185 patients (93.9%), and retrograde intervention was unsuccessful in 12 patients because the lesion could not be crossed. When the two-year restenosis numbers were examined, it was 61 (30.3%) in the antegrade group, while it was 49 (25.5%) in the retrograde group, and there was a significant difference between the groups. When the one-year stent occlusions between the groups were examined, it was 14 (6.9%) in the antegrade group and 8 (4.1%) in the retrograde group, and there was a statistically significant difference between the groups. Conclusion: The retrograde approach is as effective and safe as the antegrade approach in the treatment of femoropopliteal CTO. It should be noted that it can be used as an alternative method without the need for any support device, especially in cases where the antegrade approach is unsuccessful.","PeriodicalId":23982,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9739/tjvs.2023.04.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: In this study, the aim was to investigate whether antegrade or retrograde approaches are superior in the endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal chronic total occlusions (CTO). Material and Methods: A total of 437 patients who were diagnosed with CTO in the femoropopliteal region and who subsequently underwent endovascular procedures between February 2019 and April 2022 were evaluated retrospectively. The patients were grouped as antegrade access and retrograde access. All patients were classified according to the Rutherford and TASC (Transatlantic Intersociety Consensus II) classification. The patients were followed for 2 years. Above-ankle amputation and >50% stenosis in the target vessel were considered a failure. ABI, improvement in clinical symptoms, and limb salvage were evaluated in controls. Results: Antegrade approach was performed in 218 of the endovascular procedures. Antegrade recanalization was successful in 201 patients (92.2%), and failed antegrade attempt was seen in 17 because the lesion could not be crossed. Retrograde approach was used in 197 of endovascular interventions. Successful retrograde recanalization was unsuccessful in 185 patients (93.9%), and retrograde intervention was unsuccessful in 12 patients because the lesion could not be crossed. When the two-year restenosis numbers were examined, it was 61 (30.3%) in the antegrade group, while it was 49 (25.5%) in the retrograde group, and there was a significant difference between the groups. When the one-year stent occlusions between the groups were examined, it was 14 (6.9%) in the antegrade group and 8 (4.1%) in the retrograde group, and there was a statistically significant difference between the groups. Conclusion: The retrograde approach is as effective and safe as the antegrade approach in the treatment of femoropopliteal CTO. It should be noted that it can be used as an alternative method without the need for any support device, especially in cases where the antegrade approach is unsuccessful.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
股腘动脉慢性全闭塞血管内治疗的顺、逆行通路
目的:在本研究中,目的是探讨顺行或逆行入路在股腘动脉慢性全闭塞(CTO)的血管内治疗中是否优越。材料和方法:对2019年2月至2022年4月期间诊断为股腘区CTO并随后接受血管内手术的437例患者进行回顾性评估。患者分为顺行通路和逆行通路。所有患者均按照卢瑟福和TASC(跨大西洋社会共识II)分类进行分类。随访2年。踝关节以上截肢和靶血管狭窄>50%被认为是失败。对照组评估ABI、临床症状改善和肢体保留情况。结果:218例血管内手术采用顺行入路。201例(92.2%)患者行顺行再通成功,17例因病变不能穿过而行顺行再通失败。197例血管内介入手术采用逆行入路。185例(93.9%)患者逆行再通不成功,12例患者因病变不能交叉而逆行干预不成功。观察2年再狭窄数,顺行组为61例(30.3%),逆行组为49例(25.5%),两组间差异有统计学意义。两组间一年支架闭塞情况比较,顺行组为14例(6.9%),逆行组为8例(4.1%),两组间差异有统计学意义。结论:逆行入路与顺行入路治疗股腘动脉CTO一样安全有效。应该注意的是,它可以作为一种替代方法,而不需要任何支撑装置,特别是在顺行方法不成功的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Undesirable complication after transradial coronary angiography: A case report The factors influencing compliance in post-EVAR surveillance regarding the perspectives of practitioners and patients Risk factors for chronic venous insufficiency in nurses in Türkiye - NueVo TR Investigation of factors affecting reintervention after type A aortic dissection Carotid-subclavian bypass in the treatment of subclavian artery occlusion during epidermoid cyst excision: A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1