Work and Family Policy Framing and Gender Equality in South Korea: Focusing on the Roh Moo-Huyn and Lee Myung-Bak Administrations *

K. Ma, Seung-kyung Kim, Jae Kyung Lee
{"title":"Work and Family Policy Framing and Gender Equality in South Korea: Focusing on the Roh Moo-Huyn and Lee Myung-Bak Administrations *","authors":"K. Ma, Seung-kyung Kim, Jae Kyung Lee","doi":"10.21588/dns.2016.45.3.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to identify the possibilities and limitations in realizing a feminist agenda through the state. To this end, we conduct a critical policy frame analysis of public speeches by top-level decision makers in relation to the work and family policy of two politically contrasting governments: The administrations of President Roh Moo-hyun (2003 to 2007) and Lee Myung-bak (2008 to 2012). The results demonstrate that despite some differences, the commonality between the two governments was that the work and family policy was based on an ‘instrumentalist women’s employment’ frame, influenced by a discourse of ‘developmentalism’ that originated from the developmental state experience of Korea in the 1960-1970s. This paper then sets out how this ‘instrumentalist women’s employment’ frame has consistently functioned to prohibit the work and family balance agenda from becoming a radical and reformative means to change unequal gender relations. In conclusion, we emphasize the importance of the feminist ideas outside the state based on the redistributive frame for the caring as citizens’ rights, since the Korean developmental state has fundamental limitations in realizing a feminist agenda.","PeriodicalId":84572,"journal":{"name":"Development and society (Soul Taehakkyo. Institute for Social Devdelopment and Policy Research)","volume":"7 1","pages":"619-652"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development and society (Soul Taehakkyo. Institute for Social Devdelopment and Policy Research)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21588/dns.2016.45.3.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This research aims to identify the possibilities and limitations in realizing a feminist agenda through the state. To this end, we conduct a critical policy frame analysis of public speeches by top-level decision makers in relation to the work and family policy of two politically contrasting governments: The administrations of President Roh Moo-hyun (2003 to 2007) and Lee Myung-bak (2008 to 2012). The results demonstrate that despite some differences, the commonality between the two governments was that the work and family policy was based on an ‘instrumentalist women’s employment’ frame, influenced by a discourse of ‘developmentalism’ that originated from the developmental state experience of Korea in the 1960-1970s. This paper then sets out how this ‘instrumentalist women’s employment’ frame has consistently functioned to prohibit the work and family balance agenda from becoming a radical and reformative means to change unequal gender relations. In conclusion, we emphasize the importance of the feminist ideas outside the state based on the redistributive frame for the caring as citizens’ rights, since the Korean developmental state has fundamental limitations in realizing a feminist agenda.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国的工作和家庭政策框架与性别平等:以卢武铉和李明博政府为中心*
本研究旨在厘清透过国家实现女权主义议程的可能性与局限。为此,我们对两个政治上截然不同的政府——卢武铉总统(2003年至2007年)和李明博政府(2008年至2012年)——的高层决策者的公开演讲进行了关键的政策框架分析。结果表明,尽管存在一些差异,但两国政府之间的共同点是,工作和家庭政策基于“工具主义妇女就业”框架,受到源于20世纪60年代至70年代韩国发展国家经验的“发展主义”话语的影响。然后,本文阐述了这种“工具主义妇女就业”框架如何始终发挥作用,以禁止工作和家庭平衡议程成为改变不平等性别关系的激进和改革手段。综上所述,我们强调基于作为公民权利的关怀的再分配框架的国家之外的女权主义思想的重要性,因为韩国的发展国家在实现女权主义议程方面存在根本性的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Explaining South Korea’s Diaspora Engagement Policies A Comparative Study on Two Ways of Community Building with Different Commons Ownership Modes: Focusing on the cases of Gasi-ri and Seonheul 1-ri Synergistic Interactions between Social Policy and SSEs in Developing Countries: Interfaces in Discourse and Practice * Labour protection policy in a third world economy: The case of Indonesia Arguments on Information Secrecy Made by Public Agencies in Indonesia: A Case Study in the Disputes over Access to Information, 2010-2016
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1